Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. safe-cast serialization

safe-cast serialization

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
13 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U User 2601640

    Is there a way in C++ to serialize objects into a char buffer without using reinterpret_cast or c-style casting (and backwards on the other end)? I also don't want to use C++ streams. I don't care how difficult it is. Thanks

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Joe Woodbury
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    memcpy

    Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Joe Woodbury

      memcpy

      Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

      G Offline
      G Offline
      grassrootkit
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      memcpy Thought about this one but that would require us to cast to void*. He's saying we cannot use c-style casts too.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G grassrootkit

        memcpy Thought about this one but that would require us to cast to void*. He's saying we cannot use c-style casts too.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Joe Woodbury
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Ah, yes, he wants the MagicalSerialization() function.

        Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U User 2601640

          Is there a way in C++ to serialize objects into a char buffer without using reinterpret_cast or c-style casting (and backwards on the other end)? I also don't want to use C++ streams. I don't care how difficult it is. Thanks

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stuart Dootson
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          No casts, C++ streams not necessary[^]

          Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

          U 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Joe Woodbury

            Ah, yes, he wants the MagicalSerialization() function.

            Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

            C Offline
            C Offline
            CPallini
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Joe Woodbury wrote:

            Ah, yes, he wants the MagicalSerialization() function.

            That's exactly the point. :)

            If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
            This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
            [My articles]

            U 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stuart Dootson

              No casts, C++ streams not necessary[^]

              Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

              U Offline
              U Offline
              User 2601640
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Thanks for the info. I'll take a look at the Boost serialization code to see how it is written.

              S C 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C CPallini

                IMHO your requirements are not wise (why do you want to avoid cast?). :)

                If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                [My articles]

                U Offline
                U Offline
                User 2601640
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                c-style cast is dangerous and hard to find in code. reinterpret_cast is not portable and just as dangerous as c-style. i want a typed way to serialize/deserialize.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C CPallini

                  Joe Woodbury wrote:

                  Ah, yes, he wants the MagicalSerialization() function.

                  That's exactly the point. :)

                  If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                  This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                  [My articles]

                  U Offline
                  U Offline
                  User 2601640
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  If the answer is "It's impossible" that's fine. That's why I'm asking, because I don't know if a solution exists that satisfies my parameters.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U User 2601640

                    Thanks for the info. I'll take a look at the Boost serialization code to see how it is written.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stuart Dootson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Member 2603772 wrote:

                    I'll take a look at the Boost serialization code to see how it is written

                    You can try :-) It's not the simplest of code! Boost code can often be difficult to follow...but it is usually good quality in terms of defect escape.

                    Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U User 2601640

                      c-style cast is dangerous and hard to find in code. reinterpret_cast is not portable and just as dangerous as c-style. i want a typed way to serialize/deserialize.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      CPallini
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Member 2603772 wrote:

                      c-style cast is dangerous and hard to find in code.

                      I don't think so. In your case, moreover, the cast is well scoped. :)

                      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                      This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                      [My articles]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U User 2601640

                        Thanks for the info. I'll take a look at the Boost serialization code to see how it is written.

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CPallini
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Member 2603772 wrote:

                        Boost serialization code to see how it is written.

                        Possibly you'll find a cast, somewhere. :)

                        If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                        This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                        [My articles]

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups