Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Credit where credit is due

Credit where credit is due

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
23 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S soap brain

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    So what is it exactly that is getting deformed?

    Spacetime.

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    And what about the lonely graviton?

    It's a hypothetical particle.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

    Spacetime.

    Which is what?

    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

    It's a hypothetical particle.

    Which is rather important for the entire quantum model.

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

      Spacetime.

      Which is what?

      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

      It's a hypothetical particle.

      Which is rather important for the entire quantum model.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      S Offline
      S Offline
      soap brain
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      Which is what?

      I think you're expecting a simple answer for something that is intrinsically difficult to understand. It is a 4-dimensional, smooth, connected Lorentzian manifold.

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      Which is rather important for the entire quantum model.

      The 'quantum model' does not pretend to be perfect, and in fact everyone knows that it is doomed to eventual secession.

      O S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S soap brain

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        Which is what?

        I think you're expecting a simple answer for something that is intrinsically difficult to understand. It is a 4-dimensional, smooth, connected Lorentzian manifold.

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        Which is rather important for the entire quantum model.

        The 'quantum model' does not pretend to be perfect, and in fact everyone knows that it is doomed to eventual secession.

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

        The 'quantum model' does not pretend to be perfect, and in fact everyone knows that it is doomed to eventual secession

        Will my Confederate money be good then?

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

          The 'quantum model' does not pretend to be perfect, and in fact everyone knows that it is doomed to eventual secession

          Will my Confederate money be good then?

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          S Offline
          S Offline
          soap brain
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          Oakman wrote:

          Will my Confederate money be good then?

          You're going to have to explain what that means.

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S soap brain

            Oakman wrote:

            Will my Confederate money be good then?

            You're going to have to explain what that means.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

            You're going to have to explain what that means.

            In 1861, the Southron States seceded from the Union and set up the Confederate States of America. After their defeat by the North, many southerners remained hostile to the Washington, D.C. government which they regarded as occupiers. For almost 100 years, the saying, "Save your Confederate money, the South shall rise again!" remained current. As those who were alive during the Reconstruction, passed on, it was heard less and less. I hope you took notes, there will be a test later. Tomorrow's lesson will be on Cromwell's Commonwealth.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

              You're going to have to explain what that means.

              In 1861, the Southron States seceded from the Union and set up the Confederate States of America. After their defeat by the North, many southerners remained hostile to the Washington, D.C. government which they regarded as occupiers. For almost 100 years, the saying, "Save your Confederate money, the South shall rise again!" remained current. As those who were alive during the Reconstruction, passed on, it was heard less and less. I hope you took notes, there will be a test later. Tomorrow's lesson will be on Cromwell's Commonwealth.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              S Offline
              S Offline
              soap brain
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Ah, OK. See, we don't learn much US history in Australia. Actually, I don't think we learn any.

              Oakman wrote:

              I hope you took notes, there will be a test later.

              That reminds me of Tom Lehrer's The Elements. He sings the names of the chemical elements really fast and says "I hope you're all taking notes because there's gonna be a short quiz next period." It's really funny. :)

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S soap brain

                Ah, OK. See, we don't learn much US history in Australia. Actually, I don't think we learn any.

                Oakman wrote:

                I hope you took notes, there will be a test later.

                That reminds me of Tom Lehrer's The Elements. He sings the names of the chemical elements really fast and says "I hope you're all taking notes because there's gonna be a short quiz next period." It's really funny. :)

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                Ah, OK. See, we don't learn much US history in Australia.

                I've noticed.

                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                It's really funny

                Yes, he was the funniest math professor that ever came down the pike.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                  Ah, OK. See, we don't learn much US history in Australia.

                  I've noticed.

                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                  It's really funny

                  Yes, he was the funniest math professor that ever came down the pike.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  soap brain
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Oakman wrote:

                  I've noticed.

                  Well, it's pretty useless.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Yes, he was the funniest math professor that ever came down the pike.

                  I love his stuff! I mean, I don't get some of his references, but he's always funny. I want to get the sheet music to some of his songs - they're probably all way too hard, because I haven't been playing for very long, but I still want to try. Particularly The Elements, Fight Fiercely, Harvard; Poisoning Pigeons in the Park, and The Vatican Rag. :-D

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S soap brain

                    Oakman wrote:

                    I've noticed.

                    Well, it's pretty useless.

                    Oakman wrote:

                    Yes, he was the funniest math professor that ever came down the pike.

                    I love his stuff! I mean, I don't get some of his references, but he's always funny. I want to get the sheet music to some of his songs - they're probably all way too hard, because I haven't been playing for very long, but I still want to try. Particularly The Elements, Fight Fiercely, Harvard; Poisoning Pigeons in the Park, and The Vatican Rag. :-D

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                    Well, it's pretty useless.

                    Those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them. It appears to me that folks in your country and in mine fit that category - and therefore have elected leaders who think that history is pretty useless, too.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S soap brain

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      Which is what?

                      I think you're expecting a simple answer for something that is intrinsically difficult to understand. It is a 4-dimensional, smooth, connected Lorentzian manifold.

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      Which is rather important for the entire quantum model.

                      The 'quantum model' does not pretend to be perfect, and in fact everyone knows that it is doomed to eventual secession.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Synaptrik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      And where in High School did you learn so much of this stuff that you can debate it so? Or do you just google everything and cut and paste? I still posit that The authors Ravel and Joyce inspired your moniker and you are in no way a 15 year old kid.

                      This statement is false

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups