Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Append BStr

Append BStr

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
performancealgorithmsdebugginghelpannouncement
27 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CPalliniC CPallini

    It looks like the problem is in your bad mixing of char and wchar calls: with the following line

    BSTR st3 = ::SysAllocStringByteLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen);

    you're allocating (destLen + srcLen + 1) bytes. while in the following calls

    wcscpy(st3, dest);
    wcscat(st3, src);

    you need, (destLen + srcLen + 2) bytes. :)

    If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
    This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
    [My articles]

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mogaambo
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Thanks working great now . i don't know the +2 funda , actually i am c# developer but my firm wants me to develop project in c++. ::SysFreeString(dest); can i free this in StringAppend function itself or after my function returns.

    “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

    CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mogaambo

      Thanks working great now . i don't know the +2 funda , actually i am c# developer but my firm wants me to develop project in c++. ::SysFreeString(dest); can i free this in StringAppend function itself or after my function returns.

      “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

      CPalliniC Offline
      CPalliniC Offline
      CPallini
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Technically you can do it inside. However you probably should revise your design, for instance using a prototype like the following for your function:

      HRESULT StringAppend( BSTR * pdst, const BSTR src);

      or, better, using, as suggested, the handy _bstr_t wrapper. :)

      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
      This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
      [My articles]

      In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • CPalliniC CPallini

        Technically you can do it inside. However you probably should revise your design, for instance using a prototype like the following for your function:

        HRESULT StringAppend( BSTR * pdst, const BSTR src);

        or, better, using, as suggested, the handy _bstr_t wrapper. :)

        If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
        This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
        [My articles]

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mogaambo
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        1. BSTR * pdst why pointer here. BSTR is itself a pointer. 2. What code you have write for StringAppend function ? I want to take some idea from you.It would be very helpful for me.It's a humble request from a programmer to a professional.

        “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

        CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mogaambo

          1. BSTR * pdst why pointer here. BSTR is itself a pointer. 2. What code you have write for StringAppend function ? I want to take some idea from you.It would be very helpful for me.It's a humble request from a programmer to a professional.

          “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

          CPalliniC Offline
          CPalliniC Offline
          CPallini
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          Mogaambo wrote:

          1. BSTR * pdst why pointer here. BSTR is itself a pointer.

          Because the function will internally change the value of the original pointer, i.e. pdst is a INOUT parameter (this way you state clearly that the function may alter the original dst string).

          Mogaambo wrote:

          2. What code you have write for StringAppend function ?

          Something like

          HRESULT StringAppend(BSTR * pdest, const BSTR src)
          {
          if (pdest == NULL) return E_FAIL;
          long destLen=::SysStringLen(*pdest);
          long srcLen=::SysStringLen(src);

          BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen);
          if( tmp == NULL) return E_FAIL;
          wcscpy(tmp, *pdest);
          wcscat(tmp, src);
          ::SysFreeString(*pdest);

          pdest = &tmp;
          *pdest = tmp;
          return S_OK;
          }

          Beware: I didn't check this code (moreover I've used just the very basic E_FAIL failure return value, a good function should be more informative on failure.

          If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
          This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
          [My articles]

          modified on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 8:02 AM

          In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • CPalliniC CPallini

            Mogaambo wrote:

            1. BSTR * pdst why pointer here. BSTR is itself a pointer.

            Because the function will internally change the value of the original pointer, i.e. pdst is a INOUT parameter (this way you state clearly that the function may alter the original dst string).

            Mogaambo wrote:

            2. What code you have write for StringAppend function ?

            Something like

            HRESULT StringAppend(BSTR * pdest, const BSTR src)
            {
            if (pdest == NULL) return E_FAIL;
            long destLen=::SysStringLen(*pdest);
            long srcLen=::SysStringLen(src);

            BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen);
            if( tmp == NULL) return E_FAIL;
            wcscpy(tmp, *pdest);
            wcscat(tmp, src);
            ::SysFreeString(*pdest);

            pdest = &tmp;
            *pdest = tmp;
            return S_OK;
            }

            Beware: I didn't check this code (moreover I've used just the very basic E_FAIL failure return value, a good function should be more informative on failure.

            If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
            This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
            [My articles]

            modified on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 8:02 AM

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mogaambo
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen); dude you haven't added +2 bytes, it is crashing as that of mine, but when i added +2 it is running fine, so whenever i want allocate BSTR do i have 2 add + bytes. BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen+2);

            “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

            CPalliniC 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • K KarstenK

              this is very lame code. You better make at first the output string with CString (or otherwise) and at last ::SysAllocString() :rolleyes:

              Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mogaambo
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              What code you have written if you have to append the BSTR. It's a humble request from programmer to professional.

              “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mogaambo

                BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen); dude you haven't added +2 bytes, it is crashing as that of mine, but when i added +2 it is running fine, so whenever i want allocate BSTR do i have 2 add + bytes. BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen+2);

                “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

                CPalliniC Offline
                CPalliniC Offline
                CPallini
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Mogaambo wrote:

                dude you haven't added +2 bytes

                I know, I don't need to (I'm using SysAllocStringLen, not SysAllocStringByteLen).

                Mogaambo wrote:

                it is crashing as that of mine, but when i added +2 it is running fine

                This is very strange.

                Mogaambo wrote:

                so whenever i want allocate BSTR do i have 2 add + bytes

                Nope. Even if your point about the crash is true (and is true, I know) this is a wrong conclusion. :)

                If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                [My articles]

                In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Mogaambo

                  What code you have written if you have to append the BSTR. It's a humble request from programmer to professional.

                  “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  KarstenK
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  I would first make a complete string in a CString or TCHAR-array and at last create a BSTR.

                  Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mogaambo

                    BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen); dude you haven't added +2 bytes, it is crashing as that of mine, but when i added +2 it is running fine, so whenever i want allocate BSTR do i have 2 add + bytes. BSTR tmp = ::SysAllocStringLen(NULL,destLen+srcLen+2);

                    “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

                    CPalliniC Offline
                    CPalliniC Offline
                    CPallini
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    I made a silly error in my code, now fixed (please see again the posted snippet). It should be OK now, the following test runs fine:

                    BSTR dest = SysAllocString(L"Hi ");
                    BSTR s1,s2,s3,s4;
                    s1 = SysAllocString(L"People, ");
                    s2 = SysAllocString(L"How do ");
                    s3 = SysAllocString(L"you ");
                    s4 = SysAllocString(L"do?");
                    HRESULT hr;
                    hr = StringAppend(&dest, s1);
                    hr = StringAppend(&dest, s2);
                    hr = StringAppend(&dest, s3);
                    hr = StringAppend(&dest, s4);

                    MessageBoxW(dest, L"Info");

                    SysFreeString(s1);
                    SysFreeString(s2);
                    SysFreeString(s3);
                    SysFreeString(s4);
                    SysFreeString(dest);

                    :)

                    If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                    This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                    [My articles]

                    In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • CPalliniC CPallini

                      I made a silly error in my code, now fixed (please see again the posted snippet). It should be OK now, the following test runs fine:

                      BSTR dest = SysAllocString(L"Hi ");
                      BSTR s1,s2,s3,s4;
                      s1 = SysAllocString(L"People, ");
                      s2 = SysAllocString(L"How do ");
                      s3 = SysAllocString(L"you ");
                      s4 = SysAllocString(L"do?");
                      HRESULT hr;
                      hr = StringAppend(&dest, s1);
                      hr = StringAppend(&dest, s2);
                      hr = StringAppend(&dest, s3);
                      hr = StringAppend(&dest, s4);

                      MessageBoxW(dest, L"Info");

                      SysFreeString(s1);
                      SysFreeString(s2);
                      SysFreeString(s3);
                      SysFreeString(s4);
                      SysFreeString(dest);

                      :)

                      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                      This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                      [My articles]

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mogaambo
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      If you run your code in debug mode , it crashes at line where you freeing the variable, but runs in release mode.

                      “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

                      CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Mogaambo

                        If you run your code in debug mode , it crashes at line where you freeing the variable, but runs in release mode.

                        “You will never be a leader unless you first learn to follow and be led.” –Tiorio "Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." Henry Ford

                        CPalliniC Offline
                        CPalliniC Offline
                        CPallini
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        My test works fine in DEBUG mode on my machine. What inputs are you providing? :)

                        If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                        This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
                        [My articles]

                        In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups