Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Text of Dick Cheney's National Security Speech at AEI

Text of Dick Cheney's National Security Speech at AEI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comsecurity
30 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Tim Craig

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    And I think that 9/11 is the entire issue.

    I thought your whole issue was setting up the great christian theocracy in the US?

    "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

    I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
    ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Tim Craig wrote:

    I thought your whole issue was setting up the great christian theocracy in the US?

    No, its actually avoiding a secular theocracy.

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    O T 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Captain See Sharp

      Chris Austin wrote:

      Looks like he kept himself to only 24 "9/11"s. That has got to be a new low for that administration.

      Now you are counting "9/11s"? You need to go to the hospital, perhaps there is a tranquilizer for your obsessive compulsive schizoid personality disorder.

      ENDGAME[^]

      S Offline
      S Offline
      soap brain
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      Intel 4004 wrote:

      obsessive compulsive schizoid personality disorder

      :confused:

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Austin

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        Its a two way street.

        I don't disagree.

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        Its a vicious circle that simply cannot be undone by any other means than unwinding it all back to the beginning.

        Now that I would like to see. I believe our system is a near failure at this point. I love the federalist ideals of our country's origins but we are far from them now and short of rebooting the system I don't see a way back.

        Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stan Shannon
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        Chris Austin wrote:

        Now that I would like to see. I believe our system is a near failure at this point. I love the federalist ideals of our country's origins but we are far from them now and short of rebooting the system I don't see a way back.

        I actually do not accept that. I think American federalism is the elephant in the room that everyone is doing their best to ignore. It has never actually gone any where. We've painted it, wall papered it, covered in with cute little frilly doilys, but the concept itself was so well crafted originally that there is simply no way to remove it without bringing the entire house down.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Stan Shannon

          Tim Craig wrote:

          I thought your whole issue was setting up the great christian theocracy in the US?

          No, its actually avoiding a secular theocracy.

          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          Stan Shannon wrote:

          No, its actually avoiding a secular theocracy.

          Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Wiccan - it doesn't matter, just so long as people are forced to pray loudly, eh?

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O Oakman

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            No, its actually avoiding a secular theocracy.

            Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Wiccan - it doesn't matter, just so long as people are forced to pray loudly, eh?

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            Oakman wrote:

            Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Wiccan - it doesn't matter, just so long as people are forced to pray loudly, eh?

            No, just as long as those who do pray are not declared radical extremists not allowed to participate.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            O 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stan Shannon

              Oakman wrote:

              Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Wiccan - it doesn't matter, just so long as people are forced to pray loudly, eh?

              No, just as long as those who do pray are not declared radical extremists not allowed to participate.

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              No, just as long as those who do pray are not declared radical extremists not allowed to participate.

              Although that sentence is gramatically confusing (I'm assuming a missing "and" following "extremists"), you seem to be expressing a very libertarian concept. By the way, is there a move afoot to deny the vote to those who attend religious services? I must have missed it. . .

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Tim Craig wrote:

                I thought your whole issue was setting up the great christian theocracy in the US?

                No, its actually avoiding a secular theocracy.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tim Craig
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                No, its actually avoiding a secular theocracy.

                By setting up a christian theocracy.

                "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Tim Craig

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  No, its actually avoiding a secular theocracy.

                  By setting up a christian theocracy.

                  "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                  I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                  ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Tim Craig wrote:

                  By setting up a christian theocracy.

                  No more so than we were ever a christian theocracy. Of the two moral principles, christianity has a much better record of respecting the restraints of the constitution than does that of the secular humanists.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Tim Craig wrote:

                    By setting up a christian theocracy.

                    No more so than we were ever a christian theocracy. Of the two moral principles, christianity has a much better record of respecting the restraints of the constitution than does that of the secular humanists.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    Tim Craig
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    Of the two moral principles, christianity has a much better record of respecting the restraints of the constitution than does that of the secular humanists.

                    Tell that to the christian fundies who will be running things. They'll check your past and you'll be in the gulag, too.

                    "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                    I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                    ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Tim Craig

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      Of the two moral principles, christianity has a much better record of respecting the restraints of the constitution than does that of the secular humanists.

                      Tell that to the christian fundies who will be running things. They'll check your past and you'll be in the gulag, too.

                      "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                      I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                      ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      Tim Craig wrote:

                      Tell that to the christian fundies who will be running things.

                      Who, for example? And where would they be running things from? If we returned the authority to define social norms back to local government where they once were, there would be no center of power for anyone to be running anything from aside form mostly defending the borders and delivering mail. That is precisely why our system of government was originally designed the way it was.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        Tim Craig wrote:

                        Tell that to the christian fundies who will be running things.

                        Who, for example? And where would they be running things from? If we returned the authority to define social norms back to local government where they once were, there would be no center of power for anyone to be running anything from aside form mostly defending the borders and delivering mail. That is precisely why our system of government was originally designed the way it was.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Tim Craig
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        If we returned the authority to define social norms back to local government where they once were

                        Social norms. :laugh: And if I wear the wrong color shirt, I get sent to Stan's reeducation camp?

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        there would be no center of power

                        No, just people like you running around peeking in bedroom windows and persecuting anyone who was thought to have a sense of humor or be enjoying themselves.

                        "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                        I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                        ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups