USA: Push for a VAT in addition to our Income Tax
-
I'm not surprised. http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=5397098&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/[^] It's a great way to tax the poor. And of course, it'll really help the economy recover as folks are given another reason not to buy things.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
It's a great way to tax the poor. And of course, it'll really help the economy recover as folks are given another reason not to buy things.
In all seriousness my thoughts were along the lines of "Well, I'll just have start building and growing more stuff on my own or, tap the black market."
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
Chris Austin wrote:
at the Island of Sodor
Isn't that next door to Mordor? Give me a ring when you get there. . .
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
Isn't that next door to Mordor?
Nah, it just my 3 year old's favorite place.[^]
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
That is the last straw, I am moving to the Isle of Man or if they wont take me, at the Island of Sodor.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
Oakman wrote:
Isn't that next door to Mordor?
Nah, it just my 3 year old's favorite place.[^]
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
Oh, well in that case, I'm heading for Barsoom. Tars Tarkus will loan me a couple of thoats and I'll ride over to Gathol and see if Llana still remembers me. . .
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
I'm not surprised. http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=5397098&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/[^] It's a great way to tax the poor. And of course, it'll really help the economy recover as folks are given another reason not to buy things.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
I was viewing online videos last night about how to butcher a hog, a deer, a goose for food, how to plant a "victory garden", then I read the VAT article... Well anyway, never hurts to get acclimated or at least mildly versed in these issues... just in case. (puts tin hat on...) :~
-
If we get away from those who reflexively oppose any proposal for a new tax, conservatives tend to favour taxes on consumption in preference to taxes on income, both because of its "flat rate" aspect and because savings are not taxed. And, yes, I know that the "plan" is to have both taxes on consumption and taxes on income, but the effect of a VAT is to allow lower rates of income tax than would otherwise exist. Australia's VAT (called the GST --- Goods and Services Tax) was introduced by the conservative (in Australian terms) Howard Government and used, in part, to fund cuts in income tax rates. http://www.australianpolitics.com/news/2000/00-06-29a.shtml[^]
John Carson
-
Sodor? I don't really know but I bet I could get a great job working on the rail road. The Isle of Man has what seems to be a reasonable tax code. I don't know if their goverment is operating at a deficit but it seems that much of their GDP is due to finicial services their economy could be a complete basket case for all I know.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
If we get away from those who reflexively oppose any proposal for a new tax, conservatives tend to favour taxes on consumption in preference to taxes on income, both because of its "flat rate" aspect and because savings are not taxed. And, yes, I know that the "plan" is to have both taxes on consumption and taxes on income, but the effect of a VAT is to allow lower rates of income tax than would otherwise exist. Australia's VAT (called the GST --- Goods and Services Tax) was introduced by the conservative (in Australian terms) Howard Government and used, in part, to fund cuts in income tax rates. http://www.australianpolitics.com/news/2000/00-06-29a.shtml[^]
John Carson
I'd be on board if I thought we'd see a near term reduction in income tax. But, given the current deficit I don't see that as being a viable option unless it was a pretty high tax.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
If we get away from those who reflexively oppose any proposal for a new tax, conservatives tend to favour taxes on consumption in preference to taxes on income, both because of its "flat rate" aspect and because savings are not taxed. And, yes, I know that the "plan" is to have both taxes on consumption and taxes on income, but the effect of a VAT is to allow lower rates of income tax than would otherwise exist. Australia's VAT (called the GST --- Goods and Services Tax) was introduced by the conservative (in Australian terms) Howard Government and used, in part, to fund cuts in income tax rates. http://www.australianpolitics.com/news/2000/00-06-29a.shtml[^]
John Carson
John Carson wrote:
both because of its "flat rate" aspect and because savings are not taxed.
I'd argue that well-off conservatives favor it because a tax on consumption allows much of what they do with their money to be defined by their accountants as not consumption. A truly flat tax doesn't have loopholes.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
John Carson wrote:
both because of its "flat rate" aspect and because savings are not taxed.
I'd argue that well-off conservatives favor it because a tax on consumption allows much of what they do with their money to be defined by their accountants as not consumption. A truly flat tax doesn't have loopholes.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
I'd argue that well-off conservatives favor it because a tax on consumption allows much of what they do with their money to be defined by their accountants as not consumption. A truly flat tax doesn't have loopholes.
In Australia (and, I think, most European countries), you pay the tax when you buy things, with very few exemptions (purchases for a business purpose still attract the tax, though tax paid on inputs is credited as an offset against tax liabilities on sales). Accountants don't get much say. I think it is easier for accountants to hide income than to hide consumption.
John Carson
-
If we get away from those who reflexively oppose any proposal for a new tax, conservatives tend to favour taxes on consumption in preference to taxes on income, both because of its "flat rate" aspect and because savings are not taxed. And, yes, I know that the "plan" is to have both taxes on consumption and taxes on income, but the effect of a VAT is to allow lower rates of income tax than would otherwise exist. Australia's VAT (called the GST --- Goods and Services Tax) was introduced by the conservative (in Australian terms) Howard Government and used, in part, to fund cuts in income tax rates. http://www.australianpolitics.com/news/2000/00-06-29a.shtml[^]
John Carson
John, out of curiosity what effect would you speculate a 10% VAT would have on the sales of goods and services? Would you predict a short term contraction followed by growth if the VAT tax is coupled with a decrease in income taxes?
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
Oakman wrote:
I'd argue that well-off conservatives favor it because a tax on consumption allows much of what they do with their money to be defined by their accountants as not consumption. A truly flat tax doesn't have loopholes.
In Australia (and, I think, most European countries), you pay the tax when you buy things, with very few exemptions (purchases for a business purpose still attract the tax, though tax paid on inputs is credited as an offset against tax liabilities on sales). Accountants don't get much say. I think it is easier for accountants to hide income than to hide consumption.
John Carson
Yes John, VAT is a tax on the purchase of goods and services. For a business, this is both an input tax (things you buy) and an output tax (things you sell) with the difference being paid/refunded from the the government's Revenue and Customs & Excise service. One of the attractive bits of VAT legislation is that for government, collection of taxes is cheaper as immediate processing of VAT is done by businesses who are acting as unpaid tax collectors.
-
Oakman wrote:
I'd argue that well-off conservatives favor it because a tax on consumption allows much of what they do with their money to be defined by their accountants as not consumption. A truly flat tax doesn't have loopholes.
In Australia (and, I think, most European countries), you pay the tax when you buy things, with very few exemptions (purchases for a business purpose still attract the tax, though tax paid on inputs is credited as an offset against tax liabilities on sales). Accountants don't get much say. I think it is easier for accountants to hide income than to hide consumption.
John Carson
John Carson wrote:
Accountants don't get much say
Really? And if I set up a nature conservancy and gift it with a million dollars to buy up the land around my home (garnering a nice tax-break) thus guaranteeing that I am the only one with access to the lake, or forests near my house, how much am I taxed? How much do I pay my accountant (and lawyer) who set up this dummy non-profit that happens to be headed by my nephew (who really likes fishing in that lake)? Is there the standard (in this country) exemption from tax for this non-profit when it buys goods, even if those goods are ultimately used by others? If, so, I'd say my accountant and lawyer deserve a bonus - and maybe my p.r. guy does too for having convinced people that a sales tax is a flat tax. By the way, V.A.T. is not the same as sales tax. 'Twould be interesting to see which was instituted.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
John, out of curiosity what effect would you speculate a 10% VAT would have on the sales of goods and services? Would you predict a short term contraction followed by growth if the VAT tax is coupled with a decrease in income taxes?
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
Chris Austin wrote:
John, out of curiosity what effect would you speculate a 10% VAT would have on the sales of goods and services? Would you predict a short term contraction followed by growth if the VAT tax is coupled with a decrease in income taxes?
It would depend on a number of things, but yes, there would be a tendency for a short term depressive effect. If memory serves, there was a minor one when Australia introduced its GST. Things picked up subsequently.
John Carson
-
John Carson wrote:
Accountants don't get much say
Really? And if I set up a nature conservancy and gift it with a million dollars to buy up the land around my home (garnering a nice tax-break) thus guaranteeing that I am the only one with access to the lake, or forests near my house, how much am I taxed? How much do I pay my accountant (and lawyer) who set up this dummy non-profit that happens to be headed by my nephew (who really likes fishing in that lake)? Is there the standard (in this country) exemption from tax for this non-profit when it buys goods, even if those goods are ultimately used by others? If, so, I'd say my accountant and lawyer deserve a bonus - and maybe my p.r. guy does too for having convinced people that a sales tax is a flat tax. By the way, V.A.T. is not the same as sales tax. 'Twould be interesting to see which was instituted.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
Really? And if I set up a nature conservancy and gift it with a million dollars to buy up the land around my home (garnering a nice tax-break) thus guaranteeing that I am the only one with access to the lake, or forests near my house, how much am I taxed? How much do I pay my accountant (and lawyer) who set up this dummy non-profit that happens to be headed by my nephew (who really likes fishing in that lake)? Is there the standard (in this country) exemption from tax for this non-profit when it buys goods, even if those goods are ultimately used by others?
No, non-profits pay GST on their puchases, the same as everyone else.
Oakman wrote:
By the way, V.A.T. is not the same as sales tax.
Australia's "Goods and Services Tax" is a VAT, not a sales tax.
John Carson
-
Oakman wrote:
Really? And if I set up a nature conservancy and gift it with a million dollars to buy up the land around my home (garnering a nice tax-break) thus guaranteeing that I am the only one with access to the lake, or forests near my house, how much am I taxed? How much do I pay my accountant (and lawyer) who set up this dummy non-profit that happens to be headed by my nephew (who really likes fishing in that lake)? Is there the standard (in this country) exemption from tax for this non-profit when it buys goods, even if those goods are ultimately used by others?
No, non-profits pay GST on their puchases, the same as everyone else.
Oakman wrote:
By the way, V.A.T. is not the same as sales tax.
Australia's "Goods and Services Tax" is a VAT, not a sales tax.
John Carson
John Carson wrote:
No, non-profits pay GST on their puchases, the same as everyone else.
In Australia, perhaps. However, I'd tend to bet that in the U.S. 501-C-3's would be exempt from this tax as much as any other. I suppose that would be an argument in favor of a VAT where the government repeatedly taxes the same product or process as opposed to a sales tax which is levied only on the final consumer. Tell me, do each of your territories also tax each sale? In the U.S. the government might go for a VAT that was not levied on the final transaction simply because both cities and states have already imposed a salestax, amounting to anything from 3% to 10% of the price depending on location. (There are probably a couple of states at 0%, too.) anecdotal: A few years ago South Carolina raised its sales tax from 5% to 6% but realising that this placed an additional burden on senior citizens living on a fixed income, they provided that only 5% would be charged - if the purchaser was 85 years old. Something tells me that most folks 85 don't go shopping for themselves - I wonder if the legislature took that into consideration when they decided to be generous.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Chris Austin wrote:
John, out of curiosity what effect would you speculate a 10% VAT would have on the sales of goods and services? Would you predict a short term contraction followed by growth if the VAT tax is coupled with a decrease in income taxes?
It would depend on a number of things, but yes, there would be a tendency for a short term depressive effect. If memory serves, there was a minor one when Australia introduced its GST. Things picked up subsequently.
John Carson
John Carson wrote:
Things picked up subsequently.
As they might have anyway. Any economic theories with math about the effects of VAT?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
John Carson wrote:
No, non-profits pay GST on their puchases, the same as everyone else.
In Australia, perhaps. However, I'd tend to bet that in the U.S. 501-C-3's would be exempt from this tax as much as any other. I suppose that would be an argument in favor of a VAT where the government repeatedly taxes the same product or process as opposed to a sales tax which is levied only on the final consumer. Tell me, do each of your territories also tax each sale? In the U.S. the government might go for a VAT that was not levied on the final transaction simply because both cities and states have already imposed a salestax, amounting to anything from 3% to 10% of the price depending on location. (There are probably a couple of states at 0%, too.) anecdotal: A few years ago South Carolina raised its sales tax from 5% to 6% but realising that this placed an additional burden on senior citizens living on a fixed income, they provided that only 5% would be charged - if the purchaser was 85 years old. Something tells me that most folks 85 don't go shopping for themselves - I wonder if the legislature took that into consideration when they decided to be generous.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
Tell me, do each of your territories also tax each sale?
No. There is no state sales tax.
John Carson
-
John Carson wrote:
Things picked up subsequently.
As they might have anyway. Any economic theories with math about the effects of VAT?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Oakman wrote:
As they might have anyway.
Sure.
Oakman wrote:
Any economic theories with math about the effects of VAT?
Libararies full of the stuff.
John Carson
-
John Carson wrote:
Things picked up subsequently.
As they might have anyway. Any economic theories with math about the effects of VAT?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
Jon, VAT - you may find some of these interesting to read ... Small Business Resource - What is VAT[^] VAT & Inflation[^] VAT Missing Trader Fraud[^] A Tax-Based Test for Nominal Rigidities[^] HM Revenue and Customs & Excise[^]