Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Cooling the planet

Cooling the planet

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcom
9 Posts 5 Posters 6 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    John Carson
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    This comes from an organization with a reputation as climate change sceptics. Nevertheless, it advances some interesting ideas. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/12/AR2009061203453.html[^]

    John Carson

    I C S 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J John Carson

      This comes from an organization with a reputation as climate change sceptics. Nevertheless, it advances some interesting ideas. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/12/AR2009061203453.html[^]

      John Carson

      I Offline
      I Offline
      Ilion
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      But what do *you* think about it? ;)

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Ilion

        But what do *you* think about it? ;)

        J Offline
        J Offline
        John Carson
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Ilíon wrote:

        But what do *you* think about it?

        I think "it advances some interesting ideas". I have no more fully formed opinion than that.

        John Carson

        O I 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • J John Carson

          Ilíon wrote:

          But what do *you* think about it?

          I think "it advances some interesting ideas". I have no more fully formed opinion than that.

          John Carson

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          John Carson wrote:

          I think "it advances some interesting ideas".

          At least you have demonstrated the ability to think logically and without being forcefed your opinions like a goose being fattened up as pate, unlike some. coughilioncough

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J John Carson

            Ilíon wrote:

            But what do *you* think about it?

            I think "it advances some interesting ideas". I have no more fully formed opinion than that.

            John Carson

            I Offline
            I Offline
            Ilion
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            John Carson wrote:

            I think "it advances some interesting ideas". I have no more fully formed opinion than that.

            So, somehow, that's good enough when you are the linker, but not when I am? Interesting.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J John Carson

              This comes from an organization with a reputation as climate change sceptics. Nevertheless, it advances some interesting ideas. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/12/AR2009061203453.html[^]

              John Carson

              C Offline
              C Offline
              CaptainSeeSharp
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              If we (or the governments) decide its time to limit, halt, tax, and enforce carbon dioxide emissions then we are doomed to live in an ever increasing tyranny filled with panic and fear stricken delusional humans.

              Obloga Obama Blog[^] Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age to produce the sort of character and sort of beliefs that authorities consider desirable. Any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J John Carson

                This comes from an organization with a reputation as climate change sceptics. Nevertheless, it advances some interesting ideas. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/12/AR2009061203453.html[^]

                John Carson

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stan Shannon
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I actually thought this [^]one was more interesting... we're nearing the point where there's not enough carbon dioxide left to regulate temperatures following the same procedures Well, damn, thank God for the combustion engine than, eh?

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J John Carson

                  This comes from an organization with a reputation as climate change sceptics. Nevertheless, it advances some interesting ideas. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/12/AR2009061203453.html[^]

                  John Carson

                  I Offline
                  I Offline
                  Ilion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Robert Tracinski and Tom Minchin: Intellectual Climate Change: Could Australia ‘Blow Apart the Great Global Warming Scare’?[^]

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Ilion

                    Robert Tracinski and Tom Minchin: Intellectual Climate Change: Could Australia ‘Blow Apart the Great Global Warming Scare’?[^]

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    John Carson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Largely fantasy. Plimer has been campaigning against belief in anthropogenic global warming for years. His book has barely registered here in public debate, notwithstanding that the usual suspects have been excited by it. It is true that the government is having something of a struggle to get its legislation through the Senate. That is nothing new and is simply a reflection of the political makeup of the Senate and of the politics being played. The true position is that the governing Labor Party believes in anthropogenic global warming without qualification and the opposition party has moved from outright scepticism to a position where it basically accepts anthropogenic global warming but is against Australia getting ahead of the rest of the world in its policies due to concern about the economic consequences of doing so.

                    John Carson

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups