Vtable for derived calss

[Cpp_Com]

Hi All suppose i ve a class class BAse {public: virtual void f(); }; class derive: public Base { public: void myFunc(); }; in this case vtable ll be created for derive class or not? Thank you all in advance.

[CPallini]

kanungosudhansu wrote:

in this case vtable ll be created for derive class or not?

In this case you get compiler errors... :rolleyes: Rearranging to make it compile

#include <stdio.h>
class Base
{
public:
virtual void f(){printf("hi\n");};
};

class Derived: public Base
{
public:
void myFunc(){printf("people\n");};
};

void main()
{
Derived d;
d.f();
}

You may verify that the virtual table is, of course, created. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]

[Anish C V]

Of course it will create, if one parent class has atleast one virtual function. Anish C.V

http://www.iedetech.com

[Stuart Dootson]

It'll have a vtable, but it may be the same vtable as the base class, as no virtual methods are overridden in the derived class.

Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p