Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. IT & Infrastructure
  4. WiX - Are you kidding?

WiX - Are you kidding?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT & Infrastructure
designquestion
3 Posts 3 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    GreenChili
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I'm an interaction designer who recently has been asked to review and recommend changes for the install process for an app. The developer is using Wix. From a visual design perspective this is the ugliest thing imaginable. I've designed some visually appealing installers before using background images but have no idea how they were implemented. I am so sick of putty as my color of no choice. Putty behind checkboxes brilliant! What do you mean we can't have a link? What are other options for creating installers? I know they are out there. I just want a background image, and for simple form controls to not have putty background colors. And a link would be nice too. thank you.

    M U 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • G GreenChili

      I'm an interaction designer who recently has been asked to review and recommend changes for the install process for an app. The developer is using Wix. From a visual design perspective this is the ugliest thing imaginable. I've designed some visually appealing installers before using background images but have no idea how they were implemented. I am so sick of putty as my color of no choice. Putty behind checkboxes brilliant! What do you mean we can't have a link? What are other options for creating installers? I know they are out there. I just want a background image, and for simple form controls to not have putty background colors. And a link would be nice too. thank you.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Michael Dunn
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I've had less then stellar luck finding docs on the Wix XML format. What I usually end up doing is taking one of their samples, binging one of the tag names plus "wix" and hoping for the best. This[^] is the project's page in case you don't already know about it.

      --Mike-- Dunder-Mifflin, this is Pam.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G GreenChili

        I'm an interaction designer who recently has been asked to review and recommend changes for the install process for an app. The developer is using Wix. From a visual design perspective this is the ugliest thing imaginable. I've designed some visually appealing installers before using background images but have no idea how they were implemented. I am so sick of putty as my color of no choice. Putty behind checkboxes brilliant! What do you mean we can't have a link? What are other options for creating installers? I know they are out there. I just want a background image, and for simple form controls to not have putty background colors. And a link would be nice too. thank you.

        U Offline
        U Offline
        User 3677987
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        For a programmer, the installer is necessarily an afterthought compared to the product itself. If the programmer is goal-driven, he probably won't want or need anything too elaborate, just to make an installer. WiX does a good job of getting out of the programmer's way, and it's thus a very natural approach for a programmer. But if your employer has decided they want one of those slick installers with its own design language, theme music, etc., I don't think WiX is the answer. Such things can be written in a general-purpose language like C or C#. Or, maybe some of the custom InstallShield-type programs offer this sort of thing now. They probably do, but they're also expensive and not, in my opinion, any easier to deal with than plain old C or C#. Incidentally, what you're describing sounds like a bit of a quagmire. There has probably already been some back-and-forth between management and the developers about their "ugly" installer. No doubt the developers feel they've provided what's necessary, and management must be perplexed by their inability to make simple, cosmetic changes. You'll be jumping right into the middle of that, and you'll be without the technical ammunition to defend yourself... you can draw pictures, and the programmers can make installers, but it doesn't sound like either you or they are equipped to really address the issue of 'installer ugliness.' Personally, I think installers should be as close to invisible as possible. The use of music, custom design language not seen anywhere else, etc. tends to piss me off when I'm installing a product. This is especially true when the product is buggy, expensive, or functionally incomplete. For example, Microsoft has time to include custom photos of dorky ASP.NET coders in their Visual Studio installer, but I have been dealing with the same bugs in Visual Studio for the last 10 years. It's a question of priority, and I don't like their answer.

        modified on Wednesday, December 9, 2009 11:37 AM

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups