Do you think Bilderberg doesn't exist?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
they control the world
Well, with results like these would anyone really want to admit that they were in charge? :laugh:
Latest toy built for fun: Web Lens Best feature: Full size images when using Google image search.
pelnor wrote:
Well, with results like these would anyone really want to admit that they were in charge?
Well he did admit that he attended Bilderberg meetings. When a group of people from the highest levels of power in the world get together to discuss plans and negotiations, you can pretty much say that they run things in a unified manner. They are the apex of society's power structures.
-
pelnor wrote:
Well, with results like these would anyone really want to admit that they were in charge?
Well he did admit that he attended Bilderberg meetings. When a group of people from the highest levels of power in the world get together to discuss plans and negotiations, you can pretty much say that they run things in a unified manner. They are the apex of society's power structures.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
When a group of people from the highest levels of power in the world get together to discuss plans and negotiations, you can pretty much say that they run things in a unified manner. They are the apex of society's power structures.
YOU can say that, because it fits with your paranoia. Perhaps they meet to play cards ? How do you claim to have any idea what these people talk about, except your assumptions that they are less than human and desire to control and hurt people ? Bill Gates is the richest man in the world, he gives money to charity. Shouldn't he, by your assumptions, be funding the new world order ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
When a group of people from the highest levels of power in the world get together to discuss plans and negotiations, you can pretty much say that they run things in a unified manner. They are the apex of society's power structures.
YOU can say that, because it fits with your paranoia. Perhaps they meet to play cards ? How do you claim to have any idea what these people talk about, except your assumptions that they are less than human and desire to control and hurt people ? Bill Gates is the richest man in the world, he gives money to charity. Shouldn't he, by your assumptions, be funding the new world order ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
Shouldn't he, by your assumptions, be funding the new world order ?
He could buy kittens and puppies for everyone and then quietly run the world while we're all busy frollicking and cleaning the litter tray. The evil git.
pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Personal Music Player[^]
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
He goes on to say that he *doesn't think* that they control the world, but if they do its *probably* for the better.[^]
Not quite true I think; unfortunately the sound quality is not very good. What he appears to be saying is "I don't think they control the world, but that's probably for the better". So his comments suggests that a) he doesn't think they control the world - well, how could they? and b) it's just as well - because they are probably not as smart as they like to think. my comments in italics
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
When a group of people from the highest levels of power in the world get together to discuss plans and negotiations, you can pretty much say that they run things in a unified manner. They are the apex of society's power structures.
YOU can say that, because it fits with your paranoia. Perhaps they meet to play cards ? How do you claim to have any idea what these people talk about, except your assumptions that they are less than human and desire to control and hurt people ? Bill Gates is the richest man in the world, he gives money to charity. Shouldn't he, by your assumptions, be funding the new world order ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
He goes on to say that he *doesn't think* that they control the world, but if they do its *probably* for the better.[^]
Not quite true I think; unfortunately the sound quality is not very good. What he appears to be saying is "I don't think they control the world, but that's probably for the better". So his comments suggests that a) he doesn't think they control the world - well, how could they? and b) it's just as well - because they are probably not as smart as they like to think. my comments in italics
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
well, how could they?
The Bilderbergers are a group of people from the highest levels of authority from around the world (governments and corporations), they discuss plans and negotiations on how to operate effectively to achieve common goals.
modified on Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:44 AM
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
well, how could they?
The Bilderbergers are a group of people from the highest levels of authority from around the world (governments and corporations), they discuss plans and negotiations on how to operate effectively to achieve common goals.
modified on Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:44 AM
How do you KNOW that is what they do ? Might they just be rich people who like to hang out with other rich people b/c poor people keep hitting them for loans ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
well, how could they?
The Bilderbergers are a group of people from the highest levels of authority from around the world (governments and corporations), they discuss plans and negotiations on how to operate effectively to achieve common goals.
modified on Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:44 AM
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
they discuss plans and negotiations on how to operate effectively to achieve common goals.
Hardly sinister though is it?
Well, CSS assumes that people in power are evil by definition, and lust after more power and to control people's lives. It's an example of a fantasy that allows him to blame others for the lack of power he has over his own life. It's all very sad. I've been trying to make him see that his safety blanket is smothering him for some time now, as well as trying to get him to get the help he needs. I fear that there is little chance of that. He'll just use the internet to feed his delusions, and then one day his posts will disappear, and perhaps some neighbours will find the body in the months after that. I'm sure that a total lack of face to face interaction is also not doing him any good whatsoever.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Bilderberg_Group[^] I've stayed in that hotel
I wish I was as fortunate as fortunate as me
According to the current standards of evidence amongst conspiracy theorists, that probably makes you guilty.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
According to the current standards of evidence amongst conspiracy theorists, that probably makes you guilty.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
According to the current standards of evidence amongst conspiracy theorists, that probably makes you guilty.
My girlfriend ended up with a terrible case of food poisening from the room service there and they had to call an ambulance and doctor. Definatly a conspiracy.
I wish I was as fortunate as fortunate as me