Vaccination: Federal Health Agencies Continue to Deceive Americans [modified]
-
Richard Gale and Gary Null, Ph.D Under normal circumstances, when a public health measure is advocated or mandated, and it is accepted without question by all Federal health agencies, state and local health departments, and promoted by the mainstream media with unquestioning support from the orthodox medical community, then it is assumed that such measures at the very least meet basic scientifically proven criteria. Foremost should be public health safety and that the proven efficacy of a health program be implemented according to rigorous scientific gold standards. When this standard is ignored and denied, as is now being done by our health officials, then the wellbeing of the nation is placed at risk. Consequently, we see the concerns regarding the swine flu vaccine focusing upon supply rather than health. For our government health officials at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), vaccines have been baptized safe and, therefore, there is no reason for further debate. In fact, so certain are those in charge of the nation’s vaccination programs, even democratic discourse about vaccination controversies has been marginalized and smothered. There is no dissenting opinion published in any major industrial medical journal or magazine, nor found on any of government health websites. When put to the test, a meticulous review of the scientific literature finds that virtually all of the Federal health agencies assumptions are held in error. Furthermore, we are shocked that the CDC, FDA and HHS, with all of their resources, refuse to take into consideration the large body of clinical evidence that contradicts their biased vaccine policies. Our review of the scientific literature is at two levels. First, there is a direct relationship between vaccination and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This evidence, as we shall see, was taken under oath during a three year Congressional investigation, which clearly shows that Federal health officials were complicit in covering up the associations between vaccines and neurological damage. The second level shows irrefutable evidence, from peered reviewed journals in immunology, neurology, toxicology, etc., that the very same mercury used at high toxic levels in the flu vaccines, as well as in trace amounts in other vaccines, is toxic in all circumstances. The pronouncements by the CDC and HHS, promulgated by tabloid medical writers at the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other media outlets, are dec
-
Richard Gale and Gary Null, Ph.D Under normal circumstances, when a public health measure is advocated or mandated, and it is accepted without question by all Federal health agencies, state and local health departments, and promoted by the mainstream media with unquestioning support from the orthodox medical community, then it is assumed that such measures at the very least meet basic scientifically proven criteria. Foremost should be public health safety and that the proven efficacy of a health program be implemented according to rigorous scientific gold standards. When this standard is ignored and denied, as is now being done by our health officials, then the wellbeing of the nation is placed at risk. Consequently, we see the concerns regarding the swine flu vaccine focusing upon supply rather than health. For our government health officials at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), vaccines have been baptized safe and, therefore, there is no reason for further debate. In fact, so certain are those in charge of the nation’s vaccination programs, even democratic discourse about vaccination controversies has been marginalized and smothered. There is no dissenting opinion published in any major industrial medical journal or magazine, nor found on any of government health websites. When put to the test, a meticulous review of the scientific literature finds that virtually all of the Federal health agencies assumptions are held in error. Furthermore, we are shocked that the CDC, FDA and HHS, with all of their resources, refuse to take into consideration the large body of clinical evidence that contradicts their biased vaccine policies. Our review of the scientific literature is at two levels. First, there is a direct relationship between vaccination and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This evidence, as we shall see, was taken under oath during a three year Congressional investigation, which clearly shows that Federal health officials were complicit in covering up the associations between vaccines and neurological damage. The second level shows irrefutable evidence, from peered reviewed journals in immunology, neurology, toxicology, etc., that the very same mercury used at high toxic levels in the flu vaccines, as well as in trace amounts in other vaccines, is toxic in all circumstances. The pronouncements by the CDC and HHS, promulgated by tabloid medical writers at the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other media outlets, are dec
-
Richard Gale and Gary Null, Ph.D Under normal circumstances, when a public health measure is advocated or mandated, and it is accepted without question by all Federal health agencies, state and local health departments, and promoted by the mainstream media with unquestioning support from the orthodox medical community, then it is assumed that such measures at the very least meet basic scientifically proven criteria. Foremost should be public health safety and that the proven efficacy of a health program be implemented according to rigorous scientific gold standards. When this standard is ignored and denied, as is now being done by our health officials, then the wellbeing of the nation is placed at risk. Consequently, we see the concerns regarding the swine flu vaccine focusing upon supply rather than health. For our government health officials at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), vaccines have been baptized safe and, therefore, there is no reason for further debate. In fact, so certain are those in charge of the nation’s vaccination programs, even democratic discourse about vaccination controversies has been marginalized and smothered. There is no dissenting opinion published in any major industrial medical journal or magazine, nor found on any of government health websites. When put to the test, a meticulous review of the scientific literature finds that virtually all of the Federal health agencies assumptions are held in error. Furthermore, we are shocked that the CDC, FDA and HHS, with all of their resources, refuse to take into consideration the large body of clinical evidence that contradicts their biased vaccine policies. Our review of the scientific literature is at two levels. First, there is a direct relationship between vaccination and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This evidence, as we shall see, was taken under oath during a three year Congressional investigation, which clearly shows that Federal health officials were complicit in covering up the associations between vaccines and neurological damage. The second level shows irrefutable evidence, from peered reviewed journals in immunology, neurology, toxicology, etc., that the very same mercury used at high toxic levels in the flu vaccines, as well as in trace amounts in other vaccines, is toxic in all circumstances. The pronouncements by the CDC and HHS, promulgated by tabloid medical writers at the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other media outlets, are dec
The swine flu vaccination program has me a little worried as well On the one hand they are telling us that in the majority of people, swine flu is not a major problem and almost in the same breath they say we need to be vaccinated
-
The swine flu vaccination program has me a little worried as well On the one hand they are telling us that in the majority of people, swine flu is not a major problem and almost in the same breath they say we need to be vaccinated
One possible reason behind this is that while you getting the flu might not harm you very much, you could pass it on to someone who will have a problem with flu. So vaccinating you can help protect the people around you, as well as you. Besides, major problem is relative. No it might not kill you, but it might still make you feel very unpleasant.
My Blog: This Blog
-
One possible reason behind this is that while you getting the flu might not harm you very much, you could pass it on to someone who will have a problem with flu. So vaccinating you can help protect the people around you, as well as you. Besides, major problem is relative. No it might not kill you, but it might still make you feel very unpleasant.
My Blog: This Blog
Guillain-Barré syndrome, death, and countless other VERY serious side effects, such as infertility are worse than the flu. Autism isn't something you want to inject your children with.
-
Guillain-Barré syndrome, death, and countless other VERY serious side effects, such as infertility are worse than the flu. Autism isn't something you want to inject your children with.
-
Read the article I posted. There is a clear link between vaccines and autism. The evidence is very clear. Here is a primer: When put to the test, a meticulous review of the scientific literature finds that virtually all of the Federal health agencies assumptions are held in error. Furthermore, we are shocked that the CDC, FDA and HHS, with all of their resources, refuse to take into consideration the large body of clinical evidence that contradicts their biased vaccine policies. Our review of the scientific literature is at two levels. First, there is a direct relationship between vaccination and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This evidence, as we shall see, was taken under oath during a three year Congressional investigation, which clearly shows that Federal health officials were complicit in covering up the associations between vaccines and neurological damage. Now go review the scientific literature presented in the article.
-
Read the article I posted. There is a clear link between vaccines and autism. The evidence is very clear. Here is a primer: When put to the test, a meticulous review of the scientific literature finds that virtually all of the Federal health agencies assumptions are held in error. Furthermore, we are shocked that the CDC, FDA and HHS, with all of their resources, refuse to take into consideration the large body of clinical evidence that contradicts their biased vaccine policies. Our review of the scientific literature is at two levels. First, there is a direct relationship between vaccination and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This evidence, as we shall see, was taken under oath during a three year Congressional investigation, which clearly shows that Federal health officials were complicit in covering up the associations between vaccines and neurological damage. Now go review the scientific literature presented in the article.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Read the article I posted. There is a clear link between vaccines and autism. The evidence is very clear.
Read the article I posted. There is no clear link between vaccines and autism. This evidence is also very clear.
Wikipedia is not valid scientific literature.
-
Wikipedia is not valid scientific literature.
-
Guillain-Barré syndrome, death, and countless other VERY serious side effects, such as infertility are worse than the flu. Autism isn't something you want to inject your children with.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Autism isn't something you want to inject your children with.
Only the most uneducated moron thinks that it's possible to 'inject' autism, or that it's even possible to 'catch' autism. What drivel. As I've reminded you, I've read quite a bit on autism, my wife works in the field. It's not something you can catch, or even induce. If you were to claim that it's possible for an injection to cause a baby in the womb to become autistic, that's possible, but once you're born, um.... no.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Wikipedia is not valid scientific literature.
The books I've read and referenced before, are. So, stop telling these lies, they are ignorant, and you've been made aware of it.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Autism isn't something you want to inject your children with.
Only the most uneducated moron thinks that it's possible to 'inject' autism, or that it's even possible to 'catch' autism. What drivel. As I've reminded you, I've read quite a bit on autism, my wife works in the field. It's not something you can catch, or even induce. If you were to claim that it's possible for an injection to cause a baby in the womb to become autistic, that's possible, but once you're born, um.... no.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
If you were to claim that it's possible for an injection to cause a baby in the womb to become autistic, that's possible, but once you're born, um.... no.
If the brain is still developing, and you subject it to damage (for instance, injecting a neurotoxin into the blood stream), that can cause the child to develop autism and other mental and nervous system disorders.
-
The books I've read and referenced before, are. So, stop telling these lies, they are ignorant, and you've been made aware of it.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
How about you stop supporting tobacco science (the type of criminally fraudulent "science" that only supports special interest groups such as the tobacco & pharmaceutical industries). How dare you support something that adversely effects massive numbers of people so negatively that it impacts their life most devastatingly.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
If you were to claim that it's possible for an injection to cause a baby in the womb to become autistic, that's possible, but once you're born, um.... no.
If the brain is still developing, and you subject it to damage (for instance, injecting a neurotoxin into the blood stream), that can cause the child to develop autism and other mental and nervous system disorders.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
If the brain is still developing, and you subject it to damage (for instance, injecting a neurotoxin into the blood stream), that can cause the child to develop autism and other mental and nervous system disorders.
So long as you're talking about in the womb, that is perhaps physically possible. However, I've read a number of books that suggest autism is a type of hyper masculinity of the brain, and either way, once a child is born, you're not going to make them autistic, the brain is developed in that sense. Which makes your statement of 'injecting your children' false.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
How about you stop supporting tobacco science (the type of criminally fraudulent "science" that only supports special interest groups such as the tobacco & pharmaceutical industries). How dare you support something that adversely effects massive numbers of people so negatively that it impacts their life most devastatingly.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
How dare you support something that adversely effects massive numbers of people so negatively that it impacts their life most devastatingly.
How do you dare to continue to peddle this drivel, but when several people tried to discuss why you believe the government is going the long way around to deliberately poison people, when it would be easier and less tracable to put something in your water ( apart from the question of their motive ), you fail to post for days in order to avoid the discussion. The first thing any criminal prosecutor will try to do, is prove motive. There's no motive for the government to do the things you claim, you can't provide one. Assuming this stuff is true, why do you think the government is spending a lot of money to inject 'neurotoxins', in effect they are selecting to kill exactly the people who believe their 'propaganda'. Wouldn't it make more sense to keep the sheep and kill wise people like you and your you tube friends, the ones who are on to them ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
If you were to claim that it's possible for an injection to cause a baby in the womb to become autistic, that's possible, but once you're born, um.... no.
If the brain is still developing, and you subject it to damage (for instance, injecting a neurotoxin into the blood stream), that can cause the child to develop autism and other mental and nervous system disorders.
Mercury in the environment is a danger. As long as us humans continue to burn coal, or manufacture certain products, there will always be some exposure to, for example, mercury amalgam, chlor-alkali chemicals, thermometers, thermostat switches. Exposure from ingestion of foods found in our environment (Hg in Fish and Hg in High Fructose Corn Syrup), without excluding other possible exposures such as Hg in ambient air. Upon exposure, in a healthy individual with adequate nutrition, metallothionein is expressed and mercury is eliminated from the body. If the individual consumes an unhealthy diet leading to mineral imbalances, especially zinc loss and copper gain, then it is possible that either there will not be enough metallothionein to eliminate the mercury or the metallothionein may not function properly. Mercury Toxicity Model. Figure [^] Reference : Behavioral + Brain Functions : Mercury exposure, nutritional deficiencies and metabolic disruptions may affect learning in children[^] where [quote] Neurons lacking in plasticity are a factor in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and mental retardation. [/quote]
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
If the brain is still developing, and you subject it to damage (for instance, injecting a neurotoxin into the blood stream), that can cause the child to develop autism and other mental and nervous system disorders.
So long as you're talking about in the womb, that is perhaps physically possible. However, I've read a number of books that suggest autism is a type of hyper masculinity of the brain, and either way, once a child is born, you're not going to make them autistic, the brain is developed in that sense. Which makes your statement of 'injecting your children' false.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
You are a damn fool. You need to go inject yourself with a vile full of mercury. Fill us in on the results. I except to see:
duugug'[drool]
or nothing at all ever again.
-
You are a damn fool. You need to go inject yourself with a vile full of mercury. Fill us in on the results. I except to see:
duugug'[drool]
or nothing at all ever again.
Assuming I was dumb enough to inject myself with a vial FULL of mercury, as opposed to the small amount in a vaccine, I am sure it would do me harm. My point is entirely that it would not be possible for it to make me autistic. I note you still can't answer the motive question. I should do some research and see how much mercury the average american eats a year through eating fish, and compare that to the amount in the vaccine.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
You are a damn fool. You need to go inject yourself with a vile full of mercury. Fill us in on the results. I except to see:
duugug'[drool]
or nothing at all ever again.
Autism, try debunking these authoritative sources ... Autism genetic database (AGD): a comprehensive database including autism susceptibility gene-CNVs integrated with known noncoding RNAs and fragile sites[^] http://wren.bcf.ku.edu/[^] Defective oxytocin function: a clue to understanding the cause of autism?[^] Let me know Henize if you require further references. I have ready a further 400+ for you, just on Autism, all from authoritative sources.