Blinded by "Science"
-
NewScientist: Dark galaxy crashing into the Milky Way[^] :laugh:
What exactly is your point or do you not have one? A scientist makes an observation, he gets published, people read it and then some make it out to be fact. What is the news in that? This is what he thinks he observed. Is the world still flat for you or does someone you already trust need to explain to you the earth is round and the solar system doesn't revolve around it?
-
What exactly is your point or do you not have one? A scientist makes an observation, he gets published, people read it and then some make it out to be fact. What is the news in that? This is what he thinks he observed. Is the world still flat for you or does someone you already trust need to explain to you the earth is round and the solar system doesn't revolve around it?
wolfbinary wrote:
What exactly is your point or do you not have one? A scientist makes an observation, he gets published, people read it and then some make it out to be fact. What is the news in that? This is what he thinks he observed. Is the world still flat for you or does someone you already trust need to explain to you the earth is round and the solar system doesn't revolve around it?
And you perfectly illustrate my point. Keep up the good work.
-
wolfbinary wrote:
What exactly is your point or do you not have one? A scientist makes an observation, he gets published, people read it and then some make it out to be fact. What is the news in that? This is what he thinks he observed. Is the world still flat for you or does someone you already trust need to explain to you the earth is round and the solar system doesn't revolve around it?
And you perfectly illustrate my point. Keep up the good work.
Then you should join http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth_Society[^]. They need a new leader. :laugh:
-
NewScientist: Dark galaxy crashing into the Milky Way[^] :laugh:
-
Then you should join http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth_Society[^]. They need a new leader. :laugh:
-
Even the flat-earthers (assuming there actually are any) will tend to have a better grasp of reason ... and of 'science' ... than you "science" worshippers can ever hope to attain. But then, your sort doesn't hope, or desire, to reason properly
Ilíon wrote:
to reason properly
If I'm not, then can you prove what reasoning properly is? If you can't than opinion and conjecture is the only reasoning you have.
-
Even the flat-earthers (assuming there actually are any) will tend to have a better grasp of reason ... and of 'science' ... than you "science" worshippers can ever hope to attain. But then, your sort doesn't hope, or desire, to reason properly
-
NewScientist: Dark galaxy crashing into the Milky Way[^] :laugh:
-
NewScientist: Dark galaxy crashing into the Milky Way[^] :laugh:
-
NewScientist: Dark galaxy crashing into the Milky Way[^] :laugh:
There, I got that off my chest.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Then you should join http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth_Society[^]. They need a new leader. :laugh:
wolfbinary wrote:
They need a new leader. Laugh
That can't be hard to find. What's their age of consent and where do I sign up?
-
Even the flat-earthers (assuming there actually are any) will tend to have a better grasp of reason ... and of 'science' ... than you "science" worshippers can ever hope to attain. But then, your sort doesn't hope, or desire, to reason properly
There is something background to that post that I can, in a weird and extra-natural way, agree with.