Beautiful, just beautiful. I love this....
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
like vaccinations for instance, or perhaps fluoride in water.
Yes, I assume it's because of your ignorant paranioa regarding some other areas of firm, basic science, that you love to find proof where none exists of conspiracy.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
The facts that come from all sorts of scientific bodies, around the world.
Only one is taken as truth and used to convince people that humans are bad and need to be controlled through a global carbon tax and trading system where al gore make mega profits off of his creation that ignorant fools like you soak up like a sponge. Its called IPCC.
Unlike that standard repository of all knowledge and wisodm, YouTube. Go deliver them pizzas, monkey boy.
------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould
-
Unlike that standard repository of all knowledge and wisodm, YouTube. Go deliver them pizzas, monkey boy.
------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould
Go guzzle the bottle, then pick the "roll jam" out of your lard rolls and lick your ball grease paste off of your hands.
-
I'm no climate scientist, but I don't see any denial that they intentionally altered the "decline." If you actually READ what I quoted instead of mindlessly finding another AJ-inspired link, you'll see that they did that to correct known and generally-accepted inaccuracies in the source data. As in, something like "Well, this data source is uniformly off by about 5 degrees, as is shown in decades X, Y, and Z, when compared to all of our other sources, so we'll extrapolate and correct it so our results are consistent."
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
Go guzzle the bottle, then pick the "roll jam" out of your lard rolls and lick your ball grease paste off of your hands.
I have a wife to do that for me, you only have your mother. Come on chimpy, get that brain muscle flexing, we are all a'dither to see what inane act of dimness will spout forth from your ignorant, torpid brain next.
------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould
-
I'm no climate scientist, but I don't see any denial that they intentionally altered the "decline." If you actually READ what I quoted instead of mindlessly finding another AJ-inspired link, you'll see that they did that to correct known and generally-accepted inaccuracies in the source data. As in, something like "Well, this data source is uniformly off by about 5 degrees, as is shown in decades X, Y, and Z, when compared to all of our other sources, so we'll extrapolate and correct it so our results are consistent."
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
Just an inefficient way of saying that they manipulated the data with imaginary numbers that they made up to make the data look like the earth is catastrophically warming.
-
Just an inefficient way of saying that they manipulated the data with imaginary numbers that they made up to make the data look like the earth is catastrophically warming.
Again, read what I quoted two posts ago.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
Go guzzle the bottle, then pick the "roll jam" out of your lard rolls and lick your ball grease paste off of your hands.
-
c - continue to believe the fraudulent scientists that were caught manipulating the data and engaging in corrupt policies and malicious tactics to try convince the world that there is a warming trend when in reality there is cooling trend.
-
I have a wife to do that for me, you only have your mother. Come on chimpy, get that brain muscle flexing, we are all a'dither to see what inane act of dimness will spout forth from your ignorant, torpid brain next.
------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould
You know it might take a while for him to look up all those $.25 words you used, right? Kudos on the use of chimpy when not refering to G.W.
-
Again, read what I quoted two posts ago.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
Christian Graus wrote:
There are no facts to support your claims
Saying that does not make it true. You have my permission to Google climategate and get your dumbass educated.
There is nothing about 'climategate' that supports you or disproves what I have said.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
how does that prove or disprove global warming as a whole ?
The whole pile of BS called global warming or climate change came from those scientists. They are the ones peddling that nonsense, and thank God that they have been exposed. The 30k scientists that have real peer reviewed solid science, who the IPCC fraudsters hate, are the ones you need to be looking into.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The whole pile of BS called global warming
And this is why you will remain ignorant. Because you want to be.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
I've seen all this before. It's still all ignorant drivel.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Scared to challenge your world view ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Scared to challenge your world view ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
No, they just have some big words and his dictionary broke lookign up the last insult Dalek Dave handed him.
-
I've seen all this before. It's still all ignorant drivel.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
But it is on the internet!!! IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!
-
Scared to challenge your world view ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
No but you are afraid to challenge yours, even when they have been proven to be based on a fraudulent lie.
-
But it is on the internet!!! IT MUST BE TRUE!!!!
"Surely you don't think Gilligan's Island is real!" "Those poor people..." -- Galaxy Quest
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
No but you are afraid to challenge yours, even when they have been proven to be based on a fraudulent lie.
Strawman. You took your position ("no") and applied it to him and then attacked him as if it was his position. Your attempt to win the argument through deception has been logged and noted. You currently refuse to read the information presented, are unwilling to challenge your worldview and are basing the comment of it being fradulent on incorrect data. Try again, only this time don't use a strawman argument.