Best. Quote. Ever.
-
Don't be retarded, you know what you wrote and what you edited. Are you really suggesting I fabricated all this? I have the email from CP still in my inbox, as well as others saw it. You fucking tool.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
EliottA wrote:
I have the email from CP still in my inbox, as well as others saw it.
Wait a minute. So when global warming has been exposed as a fraud after going through their emails and data, everyone suggests that it all means nothing. But it means something when you say you have some email that proves that I said something? :laugh:
-
ragnaroknrol wrote:
Tell us you didn't say any of that, because I clearly responded to the original. ("God")
Pure hoarse shit.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Pure hoarse sh*t.
You're so stupid, you can't even spell 'horse'. How funny. Now, have you considered admitting that the reason you start name calling is that you have no-where else to go ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
She made it up.
Your word against EliottA's... And I wonder who has more credibility here...
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
Let's see, who in this forum has no credibility and a record of lying. Wait, it's YOU !!! ROTFL that you'd even bother trying to claim this is a lie. even the edited version is hilarious in it's cluelessness, but obviously the original was better.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian I honestly posted his quote for your enjoyment. To see your struggles against his idiocy on a daily basis and your relentlessness to educate, I felt it best to show you the kind of tool you are dealing with. Do you take as much joy watching him feel like an idiot at his own words? Wouldn't an 'honorable' person at the very least admit a mistake? I'm beginning to actually regret browsing the back room.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
-
EliottA wrote:
I have the email from CP still in my inbox, as well as others saw it.
Wait a minute. So when global warming has been exposed as a fraud after going through their emails and data, everyone suggests that it all means nothing. But it means something when you say you have some email that proves that I said something? :laugh:
Wow... You really aren't very good at this.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
It's as real as your idiocy. It's amazing how you are in denial. You're sitting at home feeling like a fool right now at your own stupidity. I take joy in that, I really do.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
EliottA wrote:
It's amazing how you are in denial.
Wait a minute. Global warming is exposed as a fraud though the emails and you all deny it, so you reflect that on me, what is this some kind of joke?
-
EliottA wrote:
I have the email from CP still in my inbox, as well as others saw it.
Wait a minute. So when global warming has been exposed as a fraud after going through their emails and data, everyone suggests that it all means nothing. But it means something when you say you have some email that proves that I said something? :laugh:
Unlike global warming, your message and quote was recorded and logged and dispatched to me instantly as a response to my previous post. YOU altered your own post, to a statement just as stupid and idiotic in attempts to cover up a post that was *shock* even more stupid. You can't hide from your own words.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
But it means something when you say you have some email that proves that I said something?
Fair enough, what do you say to the others who saw your quote before you edited it? You're a fucking tool.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
-
ragnaroknrol wrote:
Tell us you didn't say any of that, because I clearly responded to the original. ("God")
Pure hoarse shit.
that all you got? A poorly spelled swear as a come back? It's Horse Shit genius. Might as well have invoked Godwin's law...
-
EliottA wrote:
It's amazing how you are in denial.
Wait a minute. Global warming is exposed as a fraud though the emails and you all deny it, so you reflect that on me, what is this some kind of joke?
The global warming thread is down below. THIS THREAD IS ONLY TO ELABORATE ON YOUR IDIOCY, YOUR LACK OF INTELLIGENCE AND OVER FUCKING LACK OF COMMON SENSE for global warming go below. for your idiocy, see here.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
-
Your word against EliottA's... And I wonder who has more credibility here...
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
Other's saw it as well before he edited it.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
-
Other's saw it as well before he edited it.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
Rhetorical question anyway :) Pity, though... Wish he had left it as-is... I have all sorts of retorts lined up for people who bring the "g" word into a debate. Being atheist has some advantages.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
EliottA wrote:
It's amazing how you are in denial.
Wait a minute. Global warming is exposed as a fraud though the emails and you all deny it, so you reflect that on me, what is this some kind of joke?
Problem is this... IT WAS NOT EXPOSED AT ALL! Scientific jargon being misrepresented is not a slam dunk. Data being dropped because it is shown as unreliable so it would cause the measurements to be way off one way or another is not a slam dunk. That data was dropped BECAUSE they had data that was verifiable and showne to be accurate from various sources. If you have 1 item that doesn't work after a certain point. You don't just keep it there when you can show it is wrong with multiple checks. oh and Strawman 4. You presented your argument as established fact when it has been shown to be based on a faulty premise and attack the people arguing against it as if they were being irrational.
-
Christian I honestly posted his quote for your enjoyment. To see your struggles against his idiocy on a daily basis and your relentlessness to educate, I felt it best to show you the kind of tool you are dealing with. Do you take as much joy watching him feel like an idiot at his own words? Wouldn't an 'honorable' person at the very least admit a mistake? I'm beginning to actually regret browsing the back room.
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
EliottA wrote:
I'm beginning to actually regret browsing the back room.
Yeah, I've been thinking about quitting it. I don't think it brings out the best in me, and it's plain my attempts to get him to seek the help he so plainly needs are not going anywhere.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
The good news is that this explains how you come to believe all the conspiracy theories you go on with.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Problem is this... IT WAS NOT EXPOSED AT ALL! Scientific jargon being misrepresented is not a slam dunk. Data being dropped because it is shown as unreliable so it would cause the measurements to be way off one way or another is not a slam dunk. That data was dropped BECAUSE they had data that was verifiable and showne to be accurate from various sources. If you have 1 item that doesn't work after a certain point. You don't just keep it there when you can show it is wrong with multiple checks. oh and Strawman 4. You presented your argument as established fact when it has been shown to be based on a faulty premise and attack the people arguing against it as if they were being irrational.
I love it when he says 'you are the strawman', and shows he doesn't even understand what the term means.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Rhetorical question anyway :) Pity, though... Wish he had left it as-is... I have all sorts of retorts lined up for people who bring the "g" word into a debate. Being atheist has some advantages.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
You know those car wrecks you can see from a bit down the road? The ones where there is an ambulance, some people shaking their heads and tarps laid out over several things you assume were once a person? Those horrible crashes that you think "I should not be looking at this, this is misery, horror and pain all there laid out." Those same crashes where you find yourself slowing down anyway, because you HAVE to look... CSS is just like that.
-
EliottA wrote:
I'm beginning to actually regret browsing the back room.
Yeah, I've been thinking about quitting it. I don't think it brings out the best in me, and it's plain my attempts to get him to seek the help he so plainly needs are not going anywhere.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
It's entertaining, though. When I come into work, feeling like utter crap, knowing that any code I write in this state of mind will inevitably have more bugs than logic, I need a way to pass the time. I should develop a scoring system for BR disputes... Assign positive values to intelligent arguments, and negative values to logical fallacies (Strawmen, false dichotomies, youtube links, etc)... But the results wouldn't be very surprising.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
By fake you mean I saw it with my own eyes and responded to it, so obviously my eyes are in it with the global government illuminati vaccinating eco-fascists?
-
You know those car wrecks you can see from a bit down the road? The ones where there is an ambulance, some people shaking their heads and tarps laid out over several things you assume were once a person? Those horrible crashes that you think "I should not be looking at this, this is misery, horror and pain all there laid out." Those same crashes where you find yourself slowing down anyway, because you HAVE to look... CSS is just like that.
The perfect quote for a situation like that: "I'm disgusted and repulsed... and I can't look away." -- Clerks 2 And if you remember the context, it's even funnier.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
By fake you mean I saw it with my own eyes and responded to it, so obviously my eyes are in it with the global government illuminati vaccinating eco-fascists?
It's b/c you were not wearing your tin foil hat....
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.