Fed On the Hot Seat: Dr. Paul On the Ed Show
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
depopulation propaganda and path to global domination. Their
What's always interesting is the way that nut jobs can take the issues of the day and twist them so they are ultimately about whatever their pet paranoia is.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Its not paranoia. One only has to look at the governments own documents and and textbooks.
-
Its not paranoia. One only has to look at the governments own documents and and textbooks.
-
How many kids should a 22 year old have?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
depopulation propaganda and path to global domination. Their
What's always interesting is the way that nut jobs can take the issues of the day and twist them so they are ultimately about whatever their pet paranoia is.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Club of Rome. An international think-tank intertwined with international governmental bodies, particularly the UN. Their key members work on promoting depopulation in the name of sustainability. The Limits to Growth is one of the works by their key members. John P. Holdren. Obamas science and technology adviser. Promoted an 80% population reduction in the name of sustainability. Promoted sterilients in the water supply and in staple foods, mandatory abortions, raising children in government dormitories, and abolishment of property rights. Its in his book Ecoscience: Population, Resources, and environment. In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote: "The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics - it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes ... This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." 17 Bertrand Russell, in his book, "The Impact of Science on Society," wrote, "At present the population of the world is increasing ... War so far has had no great effect on this increase ... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others ... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full ... the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of others." 18 egative Population Growth Inc. of Teaneck, New Jersey recently circulated a letter stating their long-range goal. "We believe that our goal for the United States should be no more than 150 million, our size in 1950. For the world, we believe our goal should be a population of not more than two billion, its size shortly after the turn of the century." 19 n the Global Assessment Report of UNEP (a United Nations sponsored study group), Phase One Draft, Section 9, the authors quoted an expert who suggested that: "A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible." 20
-
How many kids should a 22 year old have?
-
Club of Rome. An international think-tank intertwined with international governmental bodies, particularly the UN. Their key members work on promoting depopulation in the name of sustainability. The Limits to Growth is one of the works by their key members. John P. Holdren. Obamas science and technology adviser. Promoted an 80% population reduction in the name of sustainability. Promoted sterilients in the water supply and in staple foods, mandatory abortions, raising children in government dormitories, and abolishment of property rights. Its in his book Ecoscience: Population, Resources, and environment. In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote: "The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics - it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes ... This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." 17 Bertrand Russell, in his book, "The Impact of Science on Society," wrote, "At present the population of the world is increasing ... War so far has had no great effect on this increase ... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others ... If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full ... the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of others." 18 egative Population Growth Inc. of Teaneck, New Jersey recently circulated a letter stating their long-range goal. "We believe that our goal for the United States should be no more than 150 million, our size in 1950. For the world, we believe our goal should be a population of not more than two billion, its size shortly after the turn of the century." 19 n the Global Assessment Report of UNEP (a United Nations sponsored study group), Phase One Draft, Section 9, the authors quoted an expert who suggested that: "A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible." 20
So, bite-sized propaganda chunks to nourish your prejudices, eh? How sad that your reading age does not allow you to understand the documents themselves.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The Limits to Growth is one of the works by their key members.
'The Limits to Growth' was published in the 1970's. 'Beyond the Limits', same authors, published in the 1990's and thus more relevant, specifically states: [T]he future doesn't lie in tinkering with resource use or simply squelching population growth in developing countries. The authors were not members of the Club of Rome, they were academics commissioned by the Club of Rome.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Ecoscience: Population, Resources, and [E]nvironment.
Paul Ehrlich, Anne Ehrlich, and John Holdren did not promote: 80% population reduction in the name of sustainability; sterilients [sic] :rolleyes: in the water supply and in staple foods; mandatory abortions; raising children in government dormitories; they surveyed a whole range of measures that had been used, or considered, to reduce population growth. Their conclusion was that access to birth control and abortion should be made readily available to those who wished to avail themselves of it. No coercion.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote:
I cannot find the original quote in context, the Couriers for 1996 are the earliest published on the UNESCO site. Google returns a mass of sites like InfoWars, each containing the edited quote, complete with '...'. So I cannot comment on an anecdotal quote.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Bertrand Russell, in his book, "The Impact of Science on Society," wrote
Let me explain it to you: <SARCASM>! In the early 1950's, when this was written, 'high-minded' people did not approve of Birth Control. Perhaps, says Russell, they would prefer an alternative, like a recurrent plague? Being 'high-minded' they would be indifferent to suffering, especially that of others. I suppose one has to be a humourless oik to take a joke like Uncle Alex seriously.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
[N]egative Population Growth Inc.
Never heard of 'em. Are they relevant to anyone outside the USA?
-
So, bite-sized propaganda chunks to nourish your prejudices, eh? How sad that your reading age does not allow you to understand the documents themselves.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The Limits to Growth is one of the works by their key members.
'The Limits to Growth' was published in the 1970's. 'Beyond the Limits', same authors, published in the 1990's and thus more relevant, specifically states: [T]he future doesn't lie in tinkering with resource use or simply squelching population growth in developing countries. The authors were not members of the Club of Rome, they were academics commissioned by the Club of Rome.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Ecoscience: Population, Resources, and [E]nvironment.
Paul Ehrlich, Anne Ehrlich, and John Holdren did not promote: 80% population reduction in the name of sustainability; sterilients [sic] :rolleyes: in the water supply and in staple foods; mandatory abortions; raising children in government dormitories; they surveyed a whole range of measures that had been used, or considered, to reduce population growth. Their conclusion was that access to birth control and abortion should be made readily available to those who wished to avail themselves of it. No coercion.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
In the UNESCO Courier of November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote:
I cannot find the original quote in context, the Couriers for 1996 are the earliest published on the UNESCO site. Google returns a mass of sites like InfoWars, each containing the edited quote, complete with '...'. So I cannot comment on an anecdotal quote.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Bertrand Russell, in his book, "The Impact of Science on Society," wrote
Let me explain it to you: <SARCASM>! In the early 1950's, when this was written, 'high-minded' people did not approve of Birth Control. Perhaps, says Russell, they would prefer an alternative, like a recurrent plague? Being 'high-minded' they would be indifferent to suffering, especially that of others. I suppose one has to be a humourless oik to take a joke like Uncle Alex seriously.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
[N]egative Population Growth Inc.
Never heard of 'em. Are they relevant to anyone outside the USA?
Bob Emmett wrote:
Sentinel Radio: Goo-Goo and Ga-Ga.
So it's #All we hear is Radio Goo-Goo, Radio Ga-Ga#? I'm sure I heard that before some where...
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
-
Bob Emmett wrote:
Sentinel Radio: Goo-Goo and Ga-Ga.
So it's #All we hear is Radio Goo-Goo, Radio Ga-Ga#? I'm sure I heard that before some where...
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
-
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
I'm sure I heard that before some where...
I have it on the best authority[^] that imagination/novelty is vastly overrated.
Bob Emmett
If Tracey says you should not be imaginative, then I would recommend being imaginative.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
-
Depends on how many times have you had sex, unless some form of Birth Control is practised.
Bob Emmett
Bob Emmett wrote:
you had sex
only with itself.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.