Lord Monckton on Global Warming...
-
"That said, to understand the pro's and con's of AGW, I go to the researchers"
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The ones at the CRU?
I am sorry, I forgot how very slow witted you are. Let me make it more easy for you to understand. AGW: Anthropogenic (that means man made) Global Warming pro: for con: against Some research scientists are for AGW. Some research scientists are against AGW. The research scientists publish papers saying why they are for or against AGW. To understand their arguments, both for and against, I read their papers. I do not watch Al Gore. I do not watch Christopher Monckton. I do not watch non scientists explaining scientific matters.
Bob Emmett
Bob Emmett wrote:
Let me make it more easy for you to understand.
Perhaps you forgot about the climategate scandal. The science has been proven fraudulent. Its a power hungry money grabbing conspiracy. Its over for you climate cultists.
-
How are you.. how dare you. Go play with your GI joe, boy. Leave the thinking to the intelligent people.
-
How are you.. how dare you. Go play with your GI joe, boy. Leave the thinking to the intelligent people.
BOY?!?! Listen here, you pretentious little fuckwit. If you want to use demeaning terms you should at least get your groups and ages correct, moron. You are the stupid little shit that was too young to do anything when I was in the military. YOU are the one asking what I was doing to help my country when you are too much of a chicken shit to enlist and try to defend it. YOU ARE THE ONE THAT CAN'T EVEN FUCKING UNDERSTAND A TERM YOU LINKED TO!!! So lose the attitude. I dare because unlike you, if someone addressed me in the manner you just did to my face, I would, in fact, kick their ass. You want to compare intelligence or courage sometime with me, feel free. You won't win that. You want to ask how I dare to point out your mistakes and your idiocy, it is because you deserve it. Now do us all a favor and go back to sucking on your thumb and hoping the tin foil hat help. Leave the thinking to intelligent, rational people.
-
Bob Emmett wrote:
Let me make it more easy for you to understand.
Perhaps you forgot about the climategate scandal. The science has been proven fraudulent. Its a power hungry money grabbing conspiracy. Its over for you climate cultists.
It is someone who has no clue how science works opinion that the science was fraudulent. Yippee, give him a cookie for not understanding the data or the reasoning behind the e-mails. It's like Fox News with you on this.
-
Bob Emmett wrote:
Let me make it more easy for you to understand.
Perhaps you forgot about the climategate scandal. The science has been proven fraudulent. Its a power hungry money grabbing conspiracy. Its over for you climate cultists.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Perhaps you forgot about the climategate scandal.
Some of us knew about it long before you, Dimbo.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The science has been proven fraudulent.
What even that against AGW?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Its a power hungry money grabbing conspiracy.
Now you are merely parroting.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Its over for you climate cultists.
So now I'm a climate cultist? :rolleyes: How come?
Bob Emmett
-
BOY?!?! Listen here, you pretentious little fuckwit. If you want to use demeaning terms you should at least get your groups and ages correct, moron. You are the stupid little shit that was too young to do anything when I was in the military. YOU are the one asking what I was doing to help my country when you are too much of a chicken shit to enlist and try to defend it. YOU ARE THE ONE THAT CAN'T EVEN FUCKING UNDERSTAND A TERM YOU LINKED TO!!! So lose the attitude. I dare because unlike you, if someone addressed me in the manner you just did to my face, I would, in fact, kick their ass. You want to compare intelligence or courage sometime with me, feel free. You won't win that. You want to ask how I dare to point out your mistakes and your idiocy, it is because you deserve it. Now do us all a favor and go back to sucking on your thumb and hoping the tin foil hat help. Leave the thinking to intelligent, rational people.
Enlist so I can defend the opium fields in afgan? You really are stupid. If you really were interested in defending this country, you would join the Oath Keepers.
-
Its the governments own document. Pity you.
-
Enlist so I can defend the opium fields in afgan? You really are stupid. If you really were interested in defending this country, you would join the Oath Keepers.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Enlist so I can defend the opium fields in afgan?
:rolleyes: You really are so very, very, dim. You cannot see what Afghanistan is all about? Go and find out from YouTube or Uncle Al - the kiddies' pal. Bye, Dimbo.
Bob Emmett PWP - can't see a real conspiracy when it's under his nose.
-
Enlist so I can defend the opium fields in afgan? You really are stupid. If you really were interested in defending this country, you would join the Oath Keepers.
Ah the oath keepers. Haven't we established they are worthless loons? Yep, I think we did.
-
Ah the oath keepers. Haven't we established they are worthless loons? Yep, I think we did.
You are a dishonorable little peon. You will burn in hell.
-
You are a dishonorable little peon. You will burn in hell.
Right, cause arguing with you is like arguing with God. Got it. By the way, if you have no honor, you shouldn't accuse someone that does of not having it. Why don't you address the post asking if you are capable of admitting to a mistake? Someone that had ANY honor would admit to a mistake and move on. But hey, all you can do is hurl insults and act like you are superior while failing to show the ability to have basic reading comprehension. You are also repeating yourself. Come on, try something better than honorable or peon. I've seen you use those at least 3-times each. The honor when always comes out when you are shown to be a coward. So what do you say, admit you screwed up on page 1 or be safe on page 2 figuring no one but you and me will notice this little exchange? I'm sure I know which it will be.