Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Is CSS incapable of admitting a mistake?

Is CSS incapable of admitting a mistake?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
helpcsscomquestionlearning
8 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    Ian Shlasko
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Is our little friend the cap'n (A rank I consider as deserving of respect as "Captain Crunch") so deluded that he can't even admit an error in semantics? Case in point: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3296305/Re-Pure-black-propaganda.aspx[^] I consider this an experiment, so I'm posting a new thread for it, just to make sure it's either being responded to or deliberately avoided, not merely unnoticed. The quick summary is that he referred to some conference as "Black Propaganda," and when the term was questioned, he posted a Wikipedia link with the definition of the term. Of course that definition does not apply to the situation at all, and would in fact disprove his argument if it did. So after about an hour of us proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the term was wrongly used, he has yet to admit his mistake... Christian is always talking about him needing psychiatric help, and I want to see if this is one of his issues. Is the infamous CaptainSeeSharp completely incapable of admitting a simple mistake? Note that I'm not bothering to dispute or support any of his political viewpoints - This is entirely about word usage. So, CSS, let's hear a response.

    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)

    J W C D M 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I Ian Shlasko

      Is our little friend the cap'n (A rank I consider as deserving of respect as "Captain Crunch") so deluded that he can't even admit an error in semantics? Case in point: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3296305/Re-Pure-black-propaganda.aspx[^] I consider this an experiment, so I'm posting a new thread for it, just to make sure it's either being responded to or deliberately avoided, not merely unnoticed. The quick summary is that he referred to some conference as "Black Propaganda," and when the term was questioned, he posted a Wikipedia link with the definition of the term. Of course that definition does not apply to the situation at all, and would in fact disprove his argument if it did. So after about an hour of us proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the term was wrongly used, he has yet to admit his mistake... Christian is always talking about him needing psychiatric help, and I want to see if this is one of his issues. Is the infamous CaptainSeeSharp completely incapable of admitting a simple mistake? Note that I'm not bothering to dispute or support any of his political viewpoints - This is entirely about word usage. So, CSS, let's hear a response.

      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jorgen Sigvardsson
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Of course he is incapable of admitting a simple mistake. He's too much of an internet retard, and we all know they cannot, and will not, under any circumstances admit that they have been wrong on any account. He's also a drughead, so I'm not sure he even knows what the concept wrong/right actually means.

      -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Ian Shlasko

        Is our little friend the cap'n (A rank I consider as deserving of respect as "Captain Crunch") so deluded that he can't even admit an error in semantics? Case in point: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3296305/Re-Pure-black-propaganda.aspx[^] I consider this an experiment, so I'm posting a new thread for it, just to make sure it's either being responded to or deliberately avoided, not merely unnoticed. The quick summary is that he referred to some conference as "Black Propaganda," and when the term was questioned, he posted a Wikipedia link with the definition of the term. Of course that definition does not apply to the situation at all, and would in fact disprove his argument if it did. So after about an hour of us proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the term was wrongly used, he has yet to admit his mistake... Christian is always talking about him needing psychiatric help, and I want to see if this is one of his issues. Is the infamous CaptainSeeSharp completely incapable of admitting a simple mistake? Note that I'm not bothering to dispute or support any of his political viewpoints - This is entirely about word usage. So, CSS, let's hear a response.

        Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)

        W Offline
        W Offline
        wolfbinary
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Short answer, yes.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Ian Shlasko

          Is our little friend the cap'n (A rank I consider as deserving of respect as "Captain Crunch") so deluded that he can't even admit an error in semantics? Case in point: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3296305/Re-Pure-black-propaganda.aspx[^] I consider this an experiment, so I'm posting a new thread for it, just to make sure it's either being responded to or deliberately avoided, not merely unnoticed. The quick summary is that he referred to some conference as "Black Propaganda," and when the term was questioned, he posted a Wikipedia link with the definition of the term. Of course that definition does not apply to the situation at all, and would in fact disprove his argument if it did. So after about an hour of us proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the term was wrongly used, he has yet to admit his mistake... Christian is always talking about him needing psychiatric help, and I want to see if this is one of his issues. Is the infamous CaptainSeeSharp completely incapable of admitting a simple mistake? Note that I'm not bothering to dispute or support any of his political viewpoints - This is entirely about word usage. So, CSS, let's hear a response.

          Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christian Graus
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Ian Shlasko wrote:

          Is our little friend the cap'n (A rank I consider as deserving of respect as "Captain Crunch") so deluded that he can't even admit an error in semantics?

          Well, duh.

          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Ian Shlasko

            Is our little friend the cap'n (A rank I consider as deserving of respect as "Captain Crunch") so deluded that he can't even admit an error in semantics? Case in point: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3296305/Re-Pure-black-propaganda.aspx[^] I consider this an experiment, so I'm posting a new thread for it, just to make sure it's either being responded to or deliberately avoided, not merely unnoticed. The quick summary is that he referred to some conference as "Black Propaganda," and when the term was questioned, he posted a Wikipedia link with the definition of the term. Of course that definition does not apply to the situation at all, and would in fact disprove his argument if it did. So after about an hour of us proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the term was wrongly used, he has yet to admit his mistake... Christian is always talking about him needing psychiatric help, and I want to see if this is one of his issues. Is the infamous CaptainSeeSharp completely incapable of admitting a simple mistake? Note that I'm not bothering to dispute or support any of his political viewpoints - This is entirely about word usage. So, CSS, let's hear a response.

            Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)

            D Offline
            D Offline
            dan sh
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Ian Shlasko wrote:

            he posted a Wikipedia link

            What!? One one of his recent threads he stated that Wiki is not at all a trusted place for getting information. It was about some person's biography. Can't remember the thread for now. He deserves to be a politician. A moment before: "No Wikipedia content cannot be trusted." A moment after: "See Wiki says this. It has got to be correct."

            50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D dan sh

              Ian Shlasko wrote:

              he posted a Wikipedia link

              What!? One one of his recent threads he stated that Wiki is not at all a trusted place for getting information. It was about some person's biography. Can't remember the thread for now. He deserves to be a politician. A moment before: "No Wikipedia content cannot be trusted." A moment after: "See Wiki says this. It has got to be correct."

              50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Distind
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The best part of it was, the link proved him wrong. I love it when he does that.

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ian Shlasko

                Is our little friend the cap'n (A rank I consider as deserving of respect as "Captain Crunch") so deluded that he can't even admit an error in semantics? Case in point: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3296305/Re-Pure-black-propaganda.aspx[^] I consider this an experiment, so I'm posting a new thread for it, just to make sure it's either being responded to or deliberately avoided, not merely unnoticed. The quick summary is that he referred to some conference as "Black Propaganda," and when the term was questioned, he posted a Wikipedia link with the definition of the term. Of course that definition does not apply to the situation at all, and would in fact disprove his argument if it did. So after about an hour of us proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the term was wrongly used, he has yet to admit his mistake... Christian is always talking about him needing psychiatric help, and I want to see if this is one of his issues. Is the infamous CaptainSeeSharp completely incapable of admitting a simple mistake? Note that I'm not bothering to dispute or support any of his political viewpoints - This is entirely about word usage. So, CSS, let's hear a response.

                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Media2r
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Admitting a mistake is a human attribute. As such I'd say No. Never. Not in a million years. //L

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Distind

                  The best part of it was, the link proved him wrong. I love it when he does that.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  dan sh
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Like he had read what was there in that page. :doh:

                  50-50-90 rule: Anytime I have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% probability I'll get it wrong...!!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups