Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Unredacted TSA Manual Posted on WikiLeaks

Unredacted TSA Manual Posted on WikiLeaks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comsecurityhelpcareer
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    CaptainSeeSharp
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Apparently the legal staff at the Transportation Security Administration are as clueless and inept as the guys who search you at the airport. The TSA released a manual for flight and other screening procedures and thought they had done a knock-up job on redacting certain sensitive areas. Problem is they attempted to do this with a PDF editor and blew it big time. Instead of printing the document and marking out the areas by hand, they merely placed black boxes over the text in the editor. :wtf: Call it laziness or stupidity. Either way, the boxes were easily defeated because they are not part of the document. Even a sixth grader with rudimentary knowledge of Acrobat or other PDF editors knows this. http://88.80.16.63/leak/tsa-screening-procedures-2008.pdf[^] At any rate, the document reveals a few things the feds don’t want us to know. For instance, Section 2A-2 (C) (1) (b) (iv) addresses which twelve passports will instantly get you moved to secondary screening. Other juicy details include the procedure for CIA-escorted passengers to be processed and the calibration process of airport metal detectors. All good stuff al-Qaeda would want to know – that is if they actually existed. http://www.infowars.com/unredacted-tsa-manual-posted-on-wikileaks/[^]

    Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^]

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C CaptainSeeSharp

      Apparently the legal staff at the Transportation Security Administration are as clueless and inept as the guys who search you at the airport. The TSA released a manual for flight and other screening procedures and thought they had done a knock-up job on redacting certain sensitive areas. Problem is they attempted to do this with a PDF editor and blew it big time. Instead of printing the document and marking out the areas by hand, they merely placed black boxes over the text in the editor. :wtf: Call it laziness or stupidity. Either way, the boxes were easily defeated because they are not part of the document. Even a sixth grader with rudimentary knowledge of Acrobat or other PDF editors knows this. http://88.80.16.63/leak/tsa-screening-procedures-2008.pdf[^] At any rate, the document reveals a few things the feds don’t want us to know. For instance, Section 2A-2 (C) (1) (b) (iv) addresses which twelve passports will instantly get you moved to secondary screening. Other juicy details include the procedure for CIA-escorted passengers to be processed and the calibration process of airport metal detectors. All good stuff al-Qaeda would want to know – that is if they actually existed. http://www.infowars.com/unredacted-tsa-manual-posted-on-wikileaks/[^]

      Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^]

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

      Instead of printing the document and marking out the areas by hand,

      Well, I would hope a sixth grader with rudimentary knowledge of Acrobat or other PDF editors would also know that it is possible to consolidate edits into a document. It is apparent that the authors of this post are as clueless and inept as the legal staff at the TSA.

      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

      Call it laziness or stupidity.

      No, it is merely ignorance.

      Bob Emmett

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups