Digital STRIP SEARCH - Inverted Airport Body Scanner Image Shows NAKED Bodies In Full Living COLOR!
-
Damn - why did she have to carry that gun ? What's hilarious is that one of the other videos that you tube gives is a Def Leppard clip called 'too late for love' ( great song ). I can see I was right, the idea that people may get a glimpse of your penis is obviously terrifying to you. What this doesn't tell you, is that the scanner is being used in a place of work, and is not configured by the people running it. I would be surprised if a person running this would have the option to save pictures of hot girls for later inversion and sharing on the internet. Do I think it's a waste of money ? yes. Do I think it's an invasion of privacy ? Yes, I guess I do. Would I go through it ? Yes, I would care less. I would much prefer that someone see my naked body for a moment, regardless of who they are, than for them to say, read all my emails or MSN chats, tap my phone, or put a camera in my house. In the grand scheme of things, it's really not that big a deal. Do you think the people doing this job get a thrill from it ? I'd imagine if I had to look at it all day, I'd get to a point where I'd barely notice a fine rack like the one in the video. Just some more tits. Move along.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Would you send your daughter through it? Would it be any different for you if you were plain stripped down and recorded?
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Would you send your daughter through it? Would it be any different for you if you were plain stripped down and recorded?
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
The video shows that it would indeed be different if I was 'plain stripped down and recorded'. At an airport, I am looking for the quickest option. If it involves an inverted picture of my weiner being on a screen for a few seconds, in a flood of other pictures, that is something I do not care about. I just hope they have a wide angle lens.... If I was at an airport, yes, I'd let my daughter go through it. I suspect she'd opt for a pat down when I told her what it did, she is 13, and probably almost as insecure about her body as you appear to be about yours.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
The video shows that it would indeed be different if I was 'plain stripped down and recorded'. At an airport, I am looking for the quickest option. If it involves an inverted picture of my weiner being on a screen for a few seconds, in a flood of other pictures, that is something I do not care about. I just hope they have a wide angle lens.... If I was at an airport, yes, I'd let my daughter go through it. I suspect she'd opt for a pat down when I told her what it did, she is 13, and probably almost as insecure about her body as you appear to be about yours.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
I'd let my daughter go through it.
So you support child pornography, and are willing to submit your own daughter as a subject of child porn.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Christian Graus wrote:
I'd let my daughter go through it.
So you support child pornography, and are willing to submit your own daughter as a subject of child porn.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Scratch my previous questions. You're obviously a master of twisting facts, using emotionally loaded language, and turning reality into something that sounds more shocking, for the sake of making a retarded point. child porn would be a child in a revealing pose, taken and distributed so that people can get a sexual thrill from it. I have a DVD called 'the human body', it's a series that covers all aspects of our physiology, the episode on death in particular is fascinating. That show had an opening sequence that starts with a naked baby in the forest. As the camera pans along, you see more people, from children through to geriatrics, all standing naked. Given that this was on video, it's possible that some sicko somewhere found it pornographic, but it was not intended that way. Our museum in Melbourne has a whole family done in wax, naked. The section on reproduction has more than life size photos of boys and girls, at ages around 8, 13, and 17. These come with text explaining the changes that occur. Now, I'd accept that these things are done in part because our society is sufficiently desensitised that an intelligent person will fail to be shocked by them, and it would have been different 50 years ago. But, the point is, nakedness is not porn. Also, an inverted photo on a screen for a moment, in a public place, cannot be porn, because the moment that the person looking at it has to see it, they are looking for weapons, not pubic hair. I can see how being a virgin and terrified of women would make you see things in a different light, I'm just explaining to you how normal people view such things.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Scratch my previous questions. You're obviously a master of twisting facts, using emotionally loaded language, and turning reality into something that sounds more shocking, for the sake of making a retarded point. child porn would be a child in a revealing pose, taken and distributed so that people can get a sexual thrill from it. I have a DVD called 'the human body', it's a series that covers all aspects of our physiology, the episode on death in particular is fascinating. That show had an opening sequence that starts with a naked baby in the forest. As the camera pans along, you see more people, from children through to geriatrics, all standing naked. Given that this was on video, it's possible that some sicko somewhere found it pornographic, but it was not intended that way. Our museum in Melbourne has a whole family done in wax, naked. The section on reproduction has more than life size photos of boys and girls, at ages around 8, 13, and 17. These come with text explaining the changes that occur. Now, I'd accept that these things are done in part because our society is sufficiently desensitised that an intelligent person will fail to be shocked by them, and it would have been different 50 years ago. But, the point is, nakedness is not porn. Also, an inverted photo on a screen for a moment, in a public place, cannot be porn, because the moment that the person looking at it has to see it, they are looking for weapons, not pubic hair. I can see how being a virgin and terrified of women would make you see things in a different light, I'm just explaining to you how normal people view such things.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/04/new-scanners-child-porn-laws[^] Also its important to point out that the raw images seen by TSA and the likes are extremely high resolution. You can see every nook and cranny, hair and pimple on the body.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/04/new-scanners-child-porn-laws[^] Also its important to point out that the raw images seen by TSA and the likes are extremely high resolution. You can see every nook and cranny, hair and pimple on the body.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
So what ? That the laws prosecuting child porn are designed to catch anyone who remotely has that sort of a mental illness, does not mean that any picture of a naked child, is child porn. your problem is, you spray this drivel at us, but you refuse to discuss the points you raise. I've raised several times that you and the people you read take the facts, then twist and sensationalise them to fit your agenda, but you refuse to answer me on that. You're too fixated on this whole camera thing. I admit, when I go through them, I'd laugh to myself at how fearful and pathetic America has become, but as I pointed out, it's not really a huge loss of civil liberties, and it doesn't really change my life in any way. So, how about forgetting about your fear that someone may see your johnson if you ever had the money to catch a flight, and somewhere to go, and focus on the other stuff you raised, and the questions I asked you ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNi-n7jk8FU[^] CNN - Body scanners can STORE, send IMAGES, group says http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/11/body.scanners/index.html[^] The TSA specified in 2008 documents that the machines must have image storage and sending abilities, the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said. In the documents, obtained by the privacy group and provided to CNN, the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in "test mode." ---------------------------------------- ----- A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/[^] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or without its application, every image will still show details of your sexual organs. Even without
Which would you rather have: 1) A trained (and probably very bored) technician scanning your genitalia from another room, to check your underpants for dangerous items. or 2) Everyone has to fly with no luggage, naked, locked into metal seating, on transparent planes. My answer would be (1), thank you very much.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNi-n7jk8FU[^] CNN - Body scanners can STORE, send IMAGES, group says http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/11/body.scanners/index.html[^] The TSA specified in 2008 documents that the machines must have image storage and sending abilities, the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said. In the documents, obtained by the privacy group and provided to CNN, the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in "test mode." ---------------------------------------- ----- A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/[^] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or without its application, every image will still show details of your sexual organs. Even without
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
YOUR SEXUAL ORGANS and those of YOUR CHILDREN will be on full display to officials sat alone in back rooms, and with a simple inversion trick, YOUR DAUGHTERS NAKED BODY, in full living high definition color will be there to be enjoyed by screeners.
Calm down, Dorothy. You mustn't assume that the screeners have the same low moral standards as the InfoWars Peeping Tom pervs.
InfoWars Peeping Toms wrote:
A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/\[^\] ... We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color.
All in the name of investigative journalism, of course. :rolleyes:
InfoWars Peeping Toms wrote:
German Security advisor Hans-Detlef Dau, a representative for a company that sells the scanners, admits that the machines, show intimate piercings, catheters and the form of breasts and penises. http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/world-news/2009/12/31/pregnancy-body-piercings-genitals/what-can-naked-scanners-really-see.html\[^\] (Source of original photo, try inverting it yourself...)
No thanks, I'll leave that to the 12 year old pervs at InfoWars. X|
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNi-n7jk8FU[^] CNN - Body scanners can STORE, send IMAGES, group says http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/11/body.scanners/index.html[^] The TSA specified in 2008 documents that the machines must have image storage and sending abilities, the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said. In the documents, obtained by the privacy group and provided to CNN, the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in "test mode." ---------------------------------------- ----- A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/[^] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or without its application, every image will still show details of your sexual organs. Even without
The german tabloid BILD is the biggest bullshit paper in the whole country. The article you are linking to was shown by BILDblog (www.bildblog.de - a watchblog, german only. Link to the article[^]) to be made up by the bild-morons. It was composed from a naked picture which was inverted and into which weapons were pasted.
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
-
The german tabloid BILD is the biggest bullshit paper in the whole country. The article you are linking to was shown by BILDblog (www.bildblog.de - a watchblog, german only. Link to the article[^]) to be made up by the bild-morons. It was composed from a naked picture which was inverted and into which weapons were pasted.
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
You can't confuse CSS with mere facts! Post the video of it being faked on youTube and then he'll believe it.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand.
-
You can't confuse CSS with mere facts! Post the video of it being faked on youTube and then he'll believe it.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand.
Well, everybody needs a hobby. His is being a moron :) . Have a nice day, I am off for a drink.
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
-
The german tabloid BILD is the biggest bullshit paper in the whole country. The article you are linking to was shown by BILDblog (www.bildblog.de - a watchblog, german only. Link to the article[^]) to be made up by the bild-morons. It was composed from a naked picture which was inverted and into which weapons were pasted.
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
I guess in your mind only news organizations that present the fact are tabloid, and the ones that parrot the government politispeak are "fact".
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Which would you rather have: 1) A trained (and probably very bored) technician scanning your genitalia from another room, to check your underpants for dangerous items. or 2) Everyone has to fly with no luggage, naked, locked into metal seating, on transparent planes. My answer would be (1), thank you very much.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand.
Neither one. I'd rather take my chances with the terrorist. Even with the "terrorist" flying is still far safer than driving, but it seems that is not the case anymore with perverts, pedophiles, and power-tripping TSA ex burger flippers commanding their will on passengers. Also adding the fact that the government routinly stages an event to push and agenda and increase sales of a particular technology or pharmaceutical for one of their revolving door buddies. *Cough* Micheal Chirdoff “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” -Benjamin Franklin
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNi-n7jk8FU[^] CNN - Body scanners can STORE, send IMAGES, group says http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/11/body.scanners/index.html[^] The TSA specified in 2008 documents that the machines must have image storage and sending abilities, the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said. In the documents, obtained by the privacy group and provided to CNN, the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in "test mode." ---------------------------------------- ----- A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/[^] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or without its application, every image will still show details of your sexual organs. Even without
JustGetUsThere had the phoney photo sussed on January 8th[^]. InfoWars posted the blown story on January 10th[^]. What is worse is that he was told that the image was a fake on the Alex Jones Show, as this comment on the above story shows: know the truth January 11th, 2010 at 9:08 pm I called the show Sunday and as soon as I said to Alex the photo was a stock image, he couldn't get me off the air fast enough. He cut my mic and wouldn't let me speak. Then one of his crew said "Turn your radio down", it wasnt even on. They want to promote this disinformation and later, when it come[s] out that it's a fake, Alex will say he didnt produce, he was just reporting what everyone else was. What a joke. I thought he was on our side, I'm not sure now where he stands. (My emphasis, and edited for punctuation.) As I advised you: Think "Hardin", and check the facts.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
I guess in your mind only news organizations that present the fact are tabloid, and the ones that parrot the government politispeak are "fact".
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Neither one. I'd rather take my chances with the terrorist. Even with the "terrorist" flying is still far safer than driving, but it seems that is not the case anymore with perverts, pedophiles, and power-tripping TSA ex burger flippers commanding their will on passengers. Also adding the fact that the government routinly stages an event to push and agenda and increase sales of a particular technology or pharmaceutical for one of their revolving door buddies. *Cough* Micheal Chirdoff “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” -Benjamin Franklin
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
JustGetUsThere had the phoney photo sussed on January 8th[^]. InfoWars posted the blown story on January 10th[^]. What is worse is that he was told that the image was a fake on the Alex Jones Show, as this comment on the above story shows: know the truth January 11th, 2010 at 9:08 pm I called the show Sunday and as soon as I said to Alex the photo was a stock image, he couldn't get me off the air fast enough. He cut my mic and wouldn't let me speak. Then one of his crew said "Turn your radio down", it wasnt even on. They want to promote this disinformation and later, when it come[s] out that it's a fake, Alex will say he didnt produce, he was just reporting what everyone else was. What a joke. I thought he was on our side, I'm not sure now where he stands. (My emphasis, and edited for punctuation.) As I advised you: Think "Hardin", and check the facts.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
Proof that they are fake? I submitted my proof that they are real, detailed, and high resolution. Now submit your proof that they are fake.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Proof that they are fake? I submitted my proof that they are real, detailed, and high resolution. Now submit your proof that they are fake.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Did you follow the JustGetUsThere link? Of course you didn't, you might just arrive at the truth, which would confuse you. Try this then Body in 360°[^]. Recognise any'body'?
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/04/new-scanners-child-porn-laws[^] Reassurances that airport screeners wont be able to save the images will provide little comfort to parents who know that the crystal clear image of their naked son or daughter being ogled by a TSA thug can merely be snapped with a handheld camera for their enjoyment later. Apologists for the scanners have routinely described the images they produce as ghostly or skeletal in an effort to downplay the intrusion of privacy they really represent. As we reported yesterday, claims that the body scanners did not provide details of genitals were DISPROVEN after a London Guardian journalist who was present at a trial for the machines earlier this week reported that the devices produce an image which make genitals eerily visible. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/07/full-body-scan-uk-airport[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/04/new-scanners-child-porn-laws[^] Reassurances that airport screeners wont be able to save the images will provide little comfort to parents who know that the crystal clear image of their naked son or daughter being ogled by a TSA thug can merely be snapped with a handheld camera for their enjoyment later. Apologists for the scanners have routinely described the images they produce as ghostly or skeletal in an effort to downplay the intrusion of privacy they really represent. As we reported yesterday, claims that the body scanners did not provide details of genitals were DISPROVEN after a London Guardian journalist who was present at a trial for the machines earlier this week reported that the devices produce an image which make genitals eerily visible. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/07/full-body-scan-uk-airport[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Reassurances that airport screeners wont be able to save the images will provide little comfort to parents who know that the crystal clear image of their naked son or daughter being ogled by a TSA thug can merely be snapped with a handheld camera for their enjoyment later. Apologists for the scanners have routinely described the images they produce as ghostly or skeletal in an effort to downplay the intrusion of privacy they really represent. As we reported yesterday, claims that the body scanners did not provide details of genitals were DISPROVEN after a London Guardian journalist who was present at a trial for the machines earlier this week reported that the devices produce an image which make genitals eerily visible.
Irrelevant to the subject - Uncle Alex knew all along that the Scanner Image was phoney. ============================================= Now, what about the stock images published by InfoWars on January 10th (days after they were proven to be fake), even after Uncle Alex had been informed that they were fake, live, on the Alex Jones Show on Sunday January 10th?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/\[^\] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or with
