Dependency Injection ?
-
Hi friends, It is a couple of days that I've been seeing
Dependency Injection
in some websites ! Would you please say : What is it ? What's the benefits of using it ? Thanks a lot. -
Hi friends, It is a couple of days that I've been seeing
Dependency Injection
in some websites ! Would you please say : What is it ? What's the benefits of using it ? Thanks a lot. -
Thanks d@nish. I will read it.
-
Hi friends, It is a couple of days that I've been seeing
Dependency Injection
in some websites ! Would you please say : What is it ? What's the benefits of using it ? Thanks a lot.Google "Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)" and be prepared to read a lot... Glad you asked though because I didn't know this:
.NET 3.5 supports Aspect Oriented concepts through the Unity container.
Start here maybe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-Oriented\_Software\_Development
-
Google "Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP)" and be prepared to read a lot... Glad you asked though because I didn't know this:
.NET 3.5 supports Aspect Oriented concepts through the Unity container.
Start here maybe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-Oriented\_Software\_Development
So, should we use something like Unity Application Block[^] to automate it ?
-
So, should we use something like Unity Application Block[^] to automate it ?
I've not yet looked into the AOP features of .NET 3.5 but I've been on teams that used Spring.NET in the past (although I wasn't involved so I don't have any practical experience with it) I just found a pretty sweet article right here on CodeProject that rates some open source AOP add-ons. This might help you if you're really set on using it. Rating of Open Source AOP Frameworks in .Net[^] Good luck. ~j
-
Hi friends, It is a couple of days that I've been seeing
Dependency Injection
in some websites ! Would you please say : What is it ? What's the benefits of using it ? Thanks a lot.My 2 cents, stay far away from dependency injection, esp with SVG and JavaScript on ASP.NET.
"Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein