Your choice of words can be powerful
-
Support of "Homosexuals" serving in the military: 59% Support of "Gays and Lesbians' serving in the military: 70% It appears they were asked both questions from the details here[^] Now, I generally ignore that whole bit about the puritanical fear of sex in this country, but can someone explain the difference in the reaction in some way other than an innate fear of 'Sexual'?
-
Support of "Homosexuals" serving in the military: 59% Support of "Gays and Lesbians' serving in the military: 70% It appears they were asked both questions from the details here[^] Now, I generally ignore that whole bit about the puritanical fear of sex in this country, but can someone explain the difference in the reaction in some way other than an innate fear of 'Sexual'?
Distind wrote:
but can someone explain the difference in the reaction
People are stupid. And... that about covers it :)
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Author of Guardians of Xen (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novel)
-
Support of "Homosexuals" serving in the military: 59% Support of "Gays and Lesbians' serving in the military: 70% It appears they were asked both questions from the details here[^] Now, I generally ignore that whole bit about the puritanical fear of sex in this country, but can someone explain the difference in the reaction in some way other than an innate fear of 'Sexual'?
-
Support of "Homosexuals" serving in the military: 59% Support of "Gays and Lesbians' serving in the military: 70% It appears they were asked both questions from the details here[^] Now, I generally ignore that whole bit about the puritanical fear of sex in this country, but can someone explain the difference in the reaction in some way other than an innate fear of 'Sexual'?
Adding Lesbians into the mix increased the number of men willing to have them in the military. Carpet munchers in uniform is a fetish, I suppose. (Yes, I am going to hell, I have a handbasket all tricked out)
-
Adding Lesbians into the mix increased the number of men willing to have them in the military. Carpet munchers in uniform is a fetish, I suppose. (Yes, I am going to hell, I have a handbasket all tricked out)
ragnaroknrol wrote:
Carpet munchers
Surely you mean Ladies in Comfortable Shoes. Or... Those that like fish from the lower buffet.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
ragnaroknrol wrote:
Carpet munchers
Surely you mean Ladies in Comfortable Shoes. Or... Those that like fish from the lower buffet.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
I suppose some may lack carpets... Either way, you ask some guy if he supports 2 women being in a cramped military installation with him that are willing to get it on with each other, and that guys libido will invariably say "Yes please!" Make it a sausagefest and he will say no.
-
Adding Lesbians into the mix increased the number of men willing to have them in the military. Carpet munchers in uniform is a fetish, I suppose. (Yes, I am going to hell, I have a handbasket all tricked out)
-
I suppose some may lack carpets... Either way, you ask some guy if he supports 2 women being in a cramped military installation with him that are willing to get it on with each other, and that guys libido will invariably say "Yes please!" Make it a sausagefest and he will say no.
-
Support of "Homosexuals" serving in the military: 59% Support of "Gays and Lesbians' serving in the military: 70% It appears they were asked both questions from the details here[^] Now, I generally ignore that whole bit about the puritanical fear of sex in this country, but can someone explain the difference in the reaction in some way other than an innate fear of 'Sexual'?