Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len

from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
helpdatabase
13 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W wbgxx

    I try to do this but the first function is error ,I don not know why ,could someone help me ,thank in advantage!!

    void StrDelete1(char ch[], int pos,int len)
    /*from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len*/
    {
    if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
    {
    printf("the string delete error!");
    exit(1);
    }
    int i;
    for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
    printf("%c", ch[i]);

    char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(sizeof(char));
    if (temp == NULL)
    {
       exit(1);
    }
    for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
    {
        temp = &ch\[i\];
         free(temp);
    }
    
    printf("\\n");
       for(i=0; i<MAX; i++)
    printf("%c", ch\[i\]);
    

    }

    void StrDelete2(char ch[], int pos,int len)
    {
    if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
    {
    printf("the string delete error!");
    exit(1);
    }
    int i;
    printf("\n");
    for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
    printf("%c", ch[i]);

    char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(MAX-len);
    if (temp == NULL)
    {
       exit(1);
    }
    for (i=0; i<pos; i++)
    temp\[i\] = ch\[i\];
    for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
    {
        temp\[i\]=ch\[i+len\];
    }
    free(ch);
    printf("\\n");
    for (i=0; i<MAX-len; i++)
    printf("%c", temp\[i\]);
    

    }

    Richard Andrew x64R Offline
    Richard Andrew x64R Offline
    Richard Andrew x64
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Here, you are freeing memory that the function didn't allocate:

    for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
    {
    temp = &ch[i];
    free(temp);
    }

    Why are you calling free there?

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W wbgxx

      I try to do this but the first function is error ,I don not know why ,could someone help me ,thank in advantage!!

      void StrDelete1(char ch[], int pos,int len)
      /*from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len*/
      {
      if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
      {
      printf("the string delete error!");
      exit(1);
      }
      int i;
      for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
      printf("%c", ch[i]);

      char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(sizeof(char));
      if (temp == NULL)
      {
         exit(1);
      }
      for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
      {
          temp = &ch\[i\];
           free(temp);
      }
      
      printf("\\n");
         for(i=0; i<MAX; i++)
      printf("%c", ch\[i\]);
      

      }

      void StrDelete2(char ch[], int pos,int len)
      {
      if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
      {
      printf("the string delete error!");
      exit(1);
      }
      int i;
      printf("\n");
      for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
      printf("%c", ch[i]);

      char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(MAX-len);
      if (temp == NULL)
      {
         exit(1);
      }
      for (i=0; i<pos; i++)
      temp\[i\] = ch\[i\];
      for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
      {
          temp\[i\]=ch\[i+len\];
      }
      free(ch);
      printf("\\n");
      for (i=0; i<MAX-len; i++)
      printf("%c", temp\[i\]);
      

      }

      G Offline
      G Offline
      Gwenio
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      void StrDelete1(char ch[], int pos,int len)
      /*from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len*/
      {
      if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len)) {
      printf("the string delete error!");
      exit(1);
      }
      int i;
      for (i=0; i

      First off, you should remove "char *temp = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char));". The allocated memory is never used, and it is never released.

      To my knowledge, free() releases a block of memory, not just that at the address pointed to. Therefore what you are trying to do may not be possible. I suggest you either call free() on the array (if it is allocated with malloc()) and release it, or set the element at pos to '\0'.

      Also, you are accessing memory you are trying to free at the end of the function. Do not do that.

      EDIT:

      Okay, I think I have figured out away to accomplish you goal. Here is a sample to get you started in the right direction (you may want to revise it):

      char * DeleteString1(char * ch,int pos,int len) {
      memmove(ch+pos,ch+pos+len,strlen(ch)-(pos+len));//Move content past pos+len to pos.
      return realloc(ch,strlen(ch));//Return a downsized memory block - should be the same as ch, but it is good to be sure.
      }

      modified on Wednesday, April 7, 2010 8:27 PM

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W wbgxx

        I try to do this but the first function is error ,I don not know why ,could someone help me ,thank in advantage!!

        void StrDelete1(char ch[], int pos,int len)
        /*from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len*/
        {
        if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
        {
        printf("the string delete error!");
        exit(1);
        }
        int i;
        for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
        printf("%c", ch[i]);

        char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(sizeof(char));
        if (temp == NULL)
        {
           exit(1);
        }
        for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
        {
            temp = &ch\[i\];
             free(temp);
        }
        
        printf("\\n");
           for(i=0; i<MAX; i++)
        printf("%c", ch\[i\]);
        

        }

        void StrDelete2(char ch[], int pos,int len)
        {
        if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
        {
        printf("the string delete error!");
        exit(1);
        }
        int i;
        printf("\n");
        for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
        printf("%c", ch[i]);

        char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(MAX-len);
        if (temp == NULL)
        {
           exit(1);
        }
        for (i=0; i<pos; i++)
        temp\[i\] = ch\[i\];
        for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
        {
            temp\[i\]=ch\[i+len\];
        }
        free(ch);
        printf("\\n");
        for (i=0; i<MAX-len; i++)
        printf("%c", temp\[i\]);
        

        }

        E Offline
        E Offline
        Eugen Podsypalnikov
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        What would you like to see ? :) A possible task could be: 1) Given: "abcdef" 2) Cut: 2 characters from the position 3 3) Result: "abcf"

        virtual void BeHappy() = 0;

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

          Here, you are freeing memory that the function didn't allocate:

          for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
          {
          temp = &ch[i];
          free(temp);
          }

          Why are you calling free there?

          W Offline
          W Offline
          wbgxx
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          "Why are you calling free there?" Yeah ,I only want to delete the number in the arry,Is it delete the memory in the stack??

          G 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Gwenio

            void StrDelete1(char ch[], int pos,int len)
            /*from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len*/
            {
            if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len)) {
            printf("the string delete error!");
            exit(1);
            }
            int i;
            for (i=0; i

            First off, you should remove "char *temp = (char*)malloc(sizeof(char));". The allocated memory is never used, and it is never released.

            To my knowledge, free() releases a block of memory, not just that at the address pointed to. Therefore what you are trying to do may not be possible. I suggest you either call free() on the array (if it is allocated with malloc()) and release it, or set the element at pos to '\0'.

            Also, you are accessing memory you are trying to free at the end of the function. Do not do that.

            EDIT:

            Okay, I think I have figured out away to accomplish you goal. Here is a sample to get you started in the right direction (you may want to revise it):

            char * DeleteString1(char * ch,int pos,int len) {
            memmove(ch+pos,ch+pos+len,strlen(ch)-(pos+len));//Move content past pos+len to pos.
            return realloc(ch,strlen(ch));//Return a downsized memory block - should be the same as ch, but it is good to be sure.
            }

            modified on Wednesday, April 7, 2010 8:27 PM

            K Offline
            K Offline
            KarstenK
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            real fine solution :thumbsup: i wouldnt realloc for performance reasons :rolleyes:

            Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K KarstenK

              real fine solution :thumbsup: i wouldnt realloc for performance reasons :rolleyes:

              Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

              G Offline
              G Offline
              Gwenio
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Given the sample code given, I assumed they want to release memory, which realloc would do. However, it is true that doing so is not needed unless memory is in short supply.

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W wbgxx

                "Why are you calling free there?" Yeah ,I only want to delete the number in the arry,Is it delete the memory in the stack??

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Gwenio
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                No, it only releases memory allocated on the heap. To release memory on the stack you have to use assembly langauge (in which case things get complicated) or let it go out of scope (like you should).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W wbgxx

                  I try to do this but the first function is error ,I don not know why ,could someone help me ,thank in advantage!!

                  void StrDelete1(char ch[], int pos,int len)
                  /*from the index pos in ch[],delete the the string of len*/
                  {
                  if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
                  {
                  printf("the string delete error!");
                  exit(1);
                  }
                  int i;
                  for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
                  printf("%c", ch[i]);

                  char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(sizeof(char));
                  if (temp == NULL)
                  {
                     exit(1);
                  }
                  for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
                  {
                      temp = &ch\[i\];
                       free(temp);
                  }
                  
                  printf("\\n");
                     for(i=0; i<MAX; i++)
                  printf("%c", ch\[i\]);
                  

                  }

                  void StrDelete2(char ch[], int pos,int len)
                  {
                  if (pos<0 || pos >(MAX-len))
                  {
                  printf("the string delete error!");
                  exit(1);
                  }
                  int i;
                  printf("\n");
                  for (i=0; i<MAX; i++)
                  printf("%c", ch[i]);

                  char \*temp = (char\*)malloc(MAX-len);
                  if (temp == NULL)
                  {
                     exit(1);
                  }
                  for (i=0; i<pos; i++)
                  temp\[i\] = ch\[i\];
                  for (i=pos; i<MAX-len; i++)
                  {
                      temp\[i\]=ch\[i+len\];
                  }
                  free(ch);
                  printf("\\n");
                  for (i=0; i<MAX-len; i++)
                  printf("%c", temp\[i\]);
                  

                  }

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David Crow
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  wbgxx wrote:

                  ...but the first function is error...

                  Which means what exactly?

                  wbgxx wrote:

                  ...I don not know why...

                  Have you used the debugger to step through the code to find out why?

                  "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

                  "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                  "Man who follows car will be exhausted." - Confucius

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Gwenio

                    Given the sample code given, I assumed they want to release memory, which realloc would do. However, it is true that doing so is not needed unless memory is in short supply.

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    KarstenK
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    this is an complicated theme, because the memory is from a bigger block which is in a list. So it can happen that only these function cost some CPU operations but also you get fragmented memory. :~

                    Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D David Crow

                      wbgxx wrote:

                      ...but the first function is error...

                      Which means what exactly?

                      wbgxx wrote:

                      ...I don not know why...

                      Have you used the debugger to step through the code to find out why?

                      "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

                      "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                      "Man who follows car will be exhausted." - Confucius

                      W Offline
                      W Offline
                      wbgxx
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Oh,I don not do this,sorry! I am freshman and does not use the debugger to step through the coder

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K KarstenK

                        this is an complicated theme, because the memory is from a bigger block which is in a list. So it can happen that only these function cost some CPU operations but also you get fragmented memory. :~

                        Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Gwenio
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Yes, down sizing the memory is problematic, but that is one more reason my sample should be revised. It was not intended to be fully functional, just showcase what could be done to get the desired results. I spent less than a minute on it so it is likely full of problems; since the enquirer is a student thinking about improve it would be good practice.

                        K 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Gwenio

                          Yes, down sizing the memory is problematic, but that is one more reason my sample should be revised. It was not intended to be fully functional, just showcase what could be done to get the desired results. I spent less than a minute on it so it is likely full of problems; since the enquirer is a student thinking about improve it would be good practice.

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          KarstenK
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Yes it looks like a 'hot fix'. :rolleyes: And therefor makes an additional comment for that performance risk sense :-O

                          Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups