how to load data faster from Sql Server into combobox
-
hii, i have 134000 records in my table.i have binded one field in the combo box.when i am opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box.please help me how will make it faster.its urgents.i have to wait 45 seconds for making any transaction.
-
hii, i have 134000 records in my table.i have binded one field in the combo box.when i am opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box.please help me how will make it faster.its urgents.i have to wait 45 seconds for making any transaction.
My suggestion is, don't bind to the combo box. 134000 is plainly too many items for the user to look through. You will be much better off providing the user with the ability to search for an item. Also, it's considered bad form to write "it's urgent" in message boards posts (kindly read the FAQs), as it is only urgent to you.
Dalek Dave: There are many words that some find offensive, Homosexuality, Alcoholism, Religion, Visual Basic, Manchester United, Butter. Pete o'Hanlon: If it wasn't insulting tools, I'd say you were dumber than a bag of spanners.
-
hii, i have 134000 records in my table.i have binded one field in the combo box.when i am opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box.please help me how will make it faster.its urgents.i have to wait 45 seconds for making any transaction.
sudhir behera wrote:
134000 records in my ... combo box
:omg:
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
-
hii, i have 134000 records in my table.i have binded one field in the combo box.when i am opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box.please help me how will make it faster.its urgents.i have to wait 45 seconds for making any transaction.
sudhir behera wrote:
opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box
I'm surprised you did not get an "out of memory" error or something. I dont think the user is going to like scrolling through soooo many records - think of a different strategy - dont use a combo box.
-
hii, i have 134000 records in my table.i have binded one field in the combo box.when i am opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box.please help me how will make it faster.its urgents.i have to wait 45 seconds for making any transaction.
sudhir behera wrote:
have 134000 records ... binded ... in the combo box
There's no fix for "stupid". Your best hope is that a competent programmer take over the project.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
sudhir behera wrote:
134000 records in my ... combo box
:omg:
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
Oh shit, I needed a good laugh. Now I have to try and explain that the the significant other.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
sudhir behera wrote:
have 134000 records ... binded ... in the combo box
There's no fix for "stupid". Your best hope is that a competent programmer take over the project.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001I looked at Luc's first because it had a 5 vote... and cracked up, ahh I enjoyed that.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
I looked at Luc's first because it had a 5 vote... and cracked up, ahh I enjoyed that.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
I'm just callin' 'em like I see 'em... :)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001 -
hii, i have 134000 records in my table.i have binded one field in the combo box.when i am opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box.please help me how will make it faster.its urgents.i have to wait 45 seconds for making any transaction.
sudhir behera wrote:
please help me how will make it faster
By loading a lot less data.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
sudhir behera wrote:
have 134000 records ... binded ... in the combo box
There's no fix for "stupid". Your best hope is that a competent programmer take over the project.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001Alas; artificial intelligence is no match for organic stupidity.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
hii, i have 134000 records in my table.i have binded one field in the combo box.when i am opening the page.it is taking 45 seconds to load data from sql serer into combo box.please help me how will make it faster.its urgents.i have to wait 45 seconds for making any transaction.
Try using a System.Terror to load the datas. :-\ OK, really bad design. You should let the user search or at least provide some sort of paging or... - But, as a small improvement to whatever you have, you could unbind the combo, get all the datas in a array of strings using a
datareaderthen use theItems.AddRange();- also wraping the whole filling of the combo in a "comboBox1.BeginUpdate(); ... comboBox1.EndUpdate);" should help a little. Again, bad design. But still 45 secs seems way to much for 134000 strings/records. -
sudhir behera wrote:
have 134000 records ... binded ... in the combo box
There's no fix for "stupid". Your best hope is that a competent programmer take over the project.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001I too giggled the first time I saw this posting and now I am in a similar predicament. I have a client who has had enough of the data entry errors his staff constantly makes while entering chemical names by hand. So we have a combo box with an autofill function, so if they type 'Alc' the combobox will display all records that start with 'Alc'. There are 3 of these combo boxes each one with over 25,000 items. The page takes 4 seconds in loading. The client is happy, I of course i'm not.
