Single mothers
-
fat_boy wrote:
I would like to know how much of your tax money goes to providing these people with a very basic level of existence compared to:
I've already said : 30%. So, that doesn't leave much in comparison for your list of more than 2 items.
fat_boy wrote:
Spending on pointless GW research.
Well, it's your opinion that research is pointless. At a minimum, the fact that most people who pay the taxes feel otherwise, means they have a right to have their money put there
fat_boy wrote:
(In the EUs case) pumping millions into Palestine.
While the US pumps it in to Israel ?
fat_boy wrote:
Pumping milliosn into Kazakhstan (yes the EU does thie, god knows why)
I thought they had excess deposits of potassium, do they need aid ? :P
fat_boy wrote:
Pumping milions into god knows whatever countries we do for god kows what reason.
Well, I think foreign aid is a good thing, if it's spent wisely. I do think that the best solution is for it to happen through the tax cuts we give to individuals who give money to aid. That way, the levels of spending represent the will of the people.
fat_boy wrote:
- Abuse by politicians. EU workers dont pay income tax, yet get massive benefits. 6) The same for the UN. 7) Pointless government programs that come to nothing. 8) Pointless QUANGOS and so on. 9) General waste and overstaffing in public bodies.
Well, this is all one group, really. I wonder that, too. But, the fact that waste exists, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to cut it where we can, and the societal cost of what I'm talking about goes well beyond money.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
fat_boy wrote:
To be unemployed, and to be able to spend all that time playing guitar
You think the unemployed can afford guitars? Just how much money do you think that the unemployed can draw in benefits?
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
You think the unemployed can afford guitars?
Yeah, they nick them.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Just how much money do you think that the unemployed can draw in benefits?
Well, in the UK it must be around 80 a week now I guess.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
You think the unemployed can afford guitars?
Yeah, they nick them.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Just how much money do you think that the unemployed can draw in benefits?
Well, in the UK it must be around 80 a week now I guess.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
You think the unemployed can afford guitars?
Yeah, they nick them.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Just how much money do you think that the unemployed can draw in benefits?
Well, in the UK it must be around 80 a week now I guess.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
Yeah, they nick them.
Because every unemployed person is automatically a thief.
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
I'm livening things up...
Well, its not working. I really dont know how posting Zenesque, which arent Zen really because they arent reality breaking enough, is lively. Try putting some life into your poetry, see it it makes a difference.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
I really dont know how posting Zenesque, which arent Zen really because they arent reality breaking enough, is lively.
As opposed to the same diatribes, generalizations, and rampant stupidity is lively?
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
I'm livening things up...
Well, its not working. I really dont know how posting Zenesque, which arent Zen really because they arent reality breaking enough, is lively. Try putting some life into your poetry, see it it makes a difference.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
"Zenesque?" They're just haikus... Ya know, 5-7-5?
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
fat_boy wrote:
I really dont know how posting Zenesque, which arent Zen really because they arent reality breaking enough, is lively.
As opposed to the same diatribes, generalizations, and rampant stupidity is lively?
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.
ragnaroknrol wrote:
As opposed to the same diatribes, generalizations, and rampant stupidity is lively?
What you mean is: "As opposed to the same diatribes, generalizations, and rampant stupidity. Are they lively?" Anyway, yes, it is difficult keeping up the interest and enthusiasm required by CPs more interesting forums.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
"Zenesque?" They're just haikus... Ya know, 5-7-5?
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)The haiku, the three line stanza, is a classic Bhuddist poem whose incompleteness and elusive meaning i designed to break the sense of reality that binds us to the earth and therefore reincrnation. Zen is a Japonese form of Bhuddism. But surely you know this?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
30%!? Are you sure!? You really think 30% of the countries revenue goes on social security excluding health care?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
I googled and it looks like it's 20%. Some countries ARE at 30%, however.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
The haiku, the three line stanza, is a classic Bhuddist poem whose incompleteness and elusive meaning i designed to break the sense of reality that binds us to the earth and therefore reincrnation. Zen is a Japonese form of Bhuddism. But surely you know this?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
Nope, never heard that before in my life. To me, a haiku is a funny little poem with a specific number of syllables. Other than that, everything is negotiable.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
At home, we have enclaves of fourth generation unemployed people, raising kids in poverty, whose best and most viable life option is to have a kid as early as possible ( I would guess median age at 15 ), so they get a baby bonus payment ( more money that their family ever sees in one place otherwise ) and a pension for life. Then I see them on TV, saying things like 'raising a child is not easy, we don't live a life of luxury'. No, you don't. But, that doesn't mean I should be paying for your life, not when you chose it. Now, IVF is taxpayer funded to people who want a kid without sex ( lesbians being the obvious one ). What the hell is going on ? And, the other issue is, the kids are rarely properly raised, and tend to turn out like CSS. So, there is no upside for society.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
You are not paying for their life. You are paying for the hope that the kids will have a real one. If we could get good fosters, I'd say take them and give them to fosters, and charge the parents the cost. I don't think we have enough fosters, as it is, and this would make it worse, until the 'parents' start figuring out they can be fosters, too. Then A has more kids for B to foster, and vise versa. There is no system that can not be gamed.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
-
You are not paying for their life. You are paying for the hope that the kids will have a real one. If we could get good fosters, I'd say take them and give them to fosters, and charge the parents the cost. I don't think we have enough fosters, as it is, and this would make it worse, until the 'parents' start figuring out they can be fosters, too. Then A has more kids for B to foster, and vise versa. There is no system that can not be gamed.
Opacity, the new Transparency.
RichardM1 wrote:
You are paying for the hope that the kids will have a real one.
That's a hell of a poor investment. Either way, I am creating an incentive for them to live dead end lives, being bad mothers, chain smoking and watching TV while their kids light fires and terrorise the neighbourhood.
RichardM1 wrote:
There is no system that can not be gamed.
A system that says you have to pay for your own mistakes, can't be gamed.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
At home, we have enclaves of fourth generation unemployed people, raising kids in poverty, whose best and most viable life option is to have a kid as early as possible ( I would guess median age at 15 ), so they get a baby bonus payment ( more money that their family ever sees in one place otherwise ) and a pension for life. Then I see them on TV, saying things like 'raising a child is not easy, we don't live a life of luxury'. No, you don't. But, that doesn't mean I should be paying for your life, not when you chose it. Now, IVF is taxpayer funded to people who want a kid without sex ( lesbians being the obvious one ). What the hell is going on ? And, the other issue is, the kids are rarely properly raised, and tend to turn out like CSS. So, there is no upside for society.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
That what socialism does. It breeds domesticated degenerate sheep
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
People bleat about the right to have children, but it is not a right, it is a priveledge. And Lesbian and Gay people moan about Their rights to raise a family, and that is fine, but what of the child's rights to have a mother and a father? And why, given the massive overpopulation in this world are we paying for IVF? If you want it, you pay for it. In the UK there is Child Allowance, a universal benefit for anyone who has had a child. Far from giving Child Allowance, I would abolish it and put a Tax on having children, that would stop the feckless from shagging their way into publicly funded housing and cut the number of feral children who come out of school after 11 years for free education barely able to scratch their name on a dole cheque and who communicate in grunts and whistles.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
Dalek Dave wrote:
I would abolish it and put a Tax on having children
So you want the family will have a lower standard of living? What happens if the parents don't pay the tax on their children?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
That what socialism does. It breeds domesticated degenerate sheep
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Perhaps. I mean, I would agree that in this case, we have too much socialism. Your problem is typically that you assume that anything that isn't the opposite of socialism has to be bad, and that all capitalism is good, taken to whatever extreme possible.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Perhaps. I mean, I would agree that in this case, we have too much socialism. Your problem is typically that you assume that anything that isn't the opposite of socialism has to be bad, and that all capitalism is good, taken to whatever extreme possible.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Liberty, property rights, and free-markets is the only system that works. It not only works, it allows society to thrive.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
I would abolish it and put a Tax on having children
So you want the family will have a lower standard of living? What happens if the parents don't pay the tax on their children?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Then the children are taken away, and the parents are sent to forced labour camps.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Liberty, property rights, and free-markets is the only system that works. It not only works, it allows society to thrive.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Liberty, property rights, and free-markets is the only system that works.
Yes, those elements need to exist, I agree. However, a completely free market only works for the chosen few. You forget that the winners write history. No-one cared about the people dying and being oppressed by that system.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Liberty, property rights, and free-markets is the only system that works.
Yes, those elements need to exist, I agree. However, a completely free market only works for the chosen few. You forget that the winners write history. No-one cared about the people dying and being oppressed by that system.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
However, a completely free market only works for the chosen few.
You have it backwards, the chosen few win in a rigged economy. There are still laws in a free-market. You cannot falsely advertise, steal, break contracts, kill people. In a free-market, with liberty and property rights, you have the perfect balance.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]