Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Thousands of plants not known to exist face extinction!

Thousands of plants not known to exist face extinction!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomannouncementlounge
16 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Ian Shlasko wrote:

    The article says that scientists estimate the existence of up to 50 million different species of flowering plants (Though I'm not clear on how they came up with that number)... We've discovered less than 2 million.

    So there are 48 million 'overwhelmingly rare' plant species out there? OK, I would imagine somone with an interest in botanical things might have noticed though.

    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

    I Offline
    I Offline
    Ian Shlasko
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    fat_boy wrote:

    So there are 48 million 'overwhelmingly rare' plant species out there? OK, I would imagine somone with an interest in botanical things might have noticed though.

    How so? They're basically saying that they calculated the number of species that SHOULD exist... Maybe it's just the number of different possible configurations of some molecular thingamajig... So the other 48 million are probably out there somewhere... Honestly, who cares? You probably just doubled the total number of views on this article by posting it here. If you think it's so stupid, why give it publicity?

    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Ian Shlasko

      fat_boy wrote:

      So there are 48 million 'overwhelmingly rare' plant species out there? OK, I would imagine somone with an interest in botanical things might have noticed though.

      How so? They're basically saying that they calculated the number of species that SHOULD exist... Maybe it's just the number of different possible configurations of some molecular thingamajig... So the other 48 million are probably out there somewhere... Honestly, who cares? You probably just doubled the total number of views on this article by posting it here. If you think it's so stupid, why give it publicity?

      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
      Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Ian Shlasko wrote:

      If you think it's so stupid, why give it publicity?

      Its ammusing, thats why.

      Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R R Giskard Reventlov

        and yet there are those who will simply accept that, because they have some 'ologies' they must be correct. I'd love to see the science behind estimating the unknown and then multiplying it by a number designed to illicit panic amongst those that latch onto any old crap. Oh yes, there are x species now and we know that there were y species until horrid man came and eat them all so there must be y-x*y^pi*666^e left to find that might, just might, already be in danger. :mad:

        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        digital man wrote:

        I'd love to see the science behind estimating the unknown

        There you go![^] Note that the study is not designed to illicit (or, more likely, elicit ;P ) panic, but is an attempt to [estimate] how many such species there are [as] an essential step in setting conservation priorities.

        Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          digital man wrote:

          I'd love to see the science behind estimating the unknown

          There you go![^] Note that the study is not designed to illicit (or, more likely, elicit ;P ) panic, but is an attempt to [estimate] how many such species there are [as] an essential step in setting conservation priorities.

          Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          R Giskard Reventlov
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          I was being a little tongue-in-cheek though it is all still just a guesstimate. ;P

          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            http://sify.com/news/thousands-of-undiscovered-plant-species-face-extinction-news-international-khiokeahegd.html[^] "'If we take the number of species that are currently known to be threatened and add to that those that are yet to be discovered..." Bring back the Global Windy please, at least it just made me laugh! This tortured logic actually makes me feel ill. :wtf:

            Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Dalek Dave
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            It is a statistical extrapolation of the genetic variability within flora phylums. It is also true that if you want to discover a new species of beetle you need only visit your garden.

            ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dalek Dave

              It is a statistical extrapolation of the genetic variability within flora phylums. It is also true that if you want to discover a new species of beetle you need only visit your garden.

              ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Dalek Dave wrote:

              It is a statistical extrapolation of the genetic variability within flora phylums

              Within as in whithin the branches emenating from any phylum or within as in between different phylums?

              Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                http://sify.com/news/thousands-of-undiscovered-plant-species-face-extinction-news-international-khiokeahegd.html[^] "'If we take the number of species that are currently known to be threatened and add to that those that are yet to be discovered..." Bring back the Global Windy please, at least it just made me laugh! This tortured logic actually makes me feel ill. :wtf:

                Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Distind
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                The joys of statistics. You think this is bad, go read over some of the 'statistical proofs evolution is impossible'. At least this here they have some small basis to work off of other than assumptions. One of the reasons I decided to go with computing rather than the sciences, somewhere between lies, damn lies and statistics I got lost and thought I would be able to actually prove something of consequence. So I went with something that has physical components and real limitations instead.

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R R Giskard Reventlov

                  I was being a little tongue-in-cheek though it is all still just a guesstimate. ;P

                  "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  digital man wrote:

                  it is all still just a guesstimate

                  Oh, I agree. They go to all the trouble of building a mathematical model, and then ask experts for estimates against which to assess its performance. That is what I find funny.

                  Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Distind

                    The joys of statistics. You think this is bad, go read over some of the 'statistical proofs evolution is impossible'. At least this here they have some small basis to work off of other than assumptions. One of the reasons I decided to go with computing rather than the sciences, somewhere between lies, damn lies and statistics I got lost and thought I would be able to actually prove something of consequence. So I went with something that has physical components and real limitations instead.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Wow, I just googled "statistical proofs evolution is impossible" .. damn I'm going to be sick. What utter crap. I hope the writers die ASAP to do the species the best service they can.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      http://sify.com/news/thousands-of-undiscovered-plant-species-face-extinction-news-international-khiokeahegd.html[^] "'If we take the number of species that are currently known to be threatened and add to that those that are yet to be discovered..." Bring back the Global Windy please, at least it just made me laugh! This tortured logic actually makes me feel ill. :wtf:

                      Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Smithers Jones
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      If a species gets wiped out and there is nobody there to witness neither its existence nor its extinction, did this species exist at all?

                      "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)

                      R L 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • S Smithers Jones

                        If a species gets wiped out and there is nobody there to witness neither its existence nor its extinction, did this species exist at all?

                        "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        R Giskard Reventlov
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        So deserves 5. :thumbsup:

                        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Smithers Jones

                          If a species gets wiped out and there is nobody there to witness neither its existence nor its extinction, did this species exist at all?

                          "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Quite. We have no idea, and, anyway, why would we care?

                          Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups