Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. Opinions

Opinions

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
data-structuresquestiondiscussionloungelearning
24 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S SirTimothy

    Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <time.h>

    #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

    #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
    #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

    void print_array(int *array) {
    int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
    char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
    --array;
    LBL0:
    if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
    goto LBL0;
    }

    main() {
    int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
    int x, y;
    int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
    void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
    srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
    x ^= x;
    LBL1:
    if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
    goto LBL1;
    PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
    (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
    LBL2:
    y = x &= ~x;
    LBL3:
    if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
    if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
    goto LBL3;
    }
    if (x = x) goto LBL2;
    PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
    (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
    }

    R Offline
    R Offline
    riced
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Yup. It's a horror. :)

    Regards David R --------------------------------------------------------------- "Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S SirTimothy

      Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

      #include <stdlib.h>
      #include <stdio.h>
      #include <time.h>

      #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

      #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
      #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

      void print_array(int *array) {
      int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
      char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
      --array;
      LBL0:
      if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
      goto LBL0;
      }

      main() {
      int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
      int x, y;
      int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
      void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
      srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
      x ^= x;
      LBL1:
      if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
      goto LBL1;
      PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
      (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
      LBL2:
      y = x &= ~x;
      LBL3:
      if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
      if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
      goto LBL3;
      }
      if (x = x) goto LBL2;
      PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
      (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
      }

      Q Offline
      Q Offline
      QuiJohn
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      This was for an obfuscated C contest, right? RIGHT? (Must resist the urge to trace through it...)


      He said, "Boy I'm just old and lonely, But thank you for your concern, Here's wishing you a Happy New Year." I wished him one back in return.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S SirTimothy

        Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

        #include <stdlib.h>
        #include <stdio.h>
        #include <time.h>

        #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

        #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
        #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

        void print_array(int *array) {
        int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
        char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
        --array;
        LBL0:
        if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
        goto LBL0;
        }

        main() {
        int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
        int x, y;
        int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
        void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
        srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
        x ^= x;
        LBL1:
        if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
        goto LBL1;
        PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
        (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
        LBL2:
        y = x &= ~x;
        LBL3:
        if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
        if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
        goto LBL3;
        }
        if (x = x) goto LBL2;
        PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
        (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
        }

        P Offline
        P Offline
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Wow... that's kind of a tour de force.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S SirTimothy

          Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

          #include <stdlib.h>
          #include <stdio.h>
          #include <time.h>

          #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

          #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
          #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

          void print_array(int *array) {
          int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
          char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
          --array;
          LBL0:
          if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
          goto LBL0;
          }

          main() {
          int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
          int x, y;
          int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
          void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
          srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
          x ^= x;
          LBL1:
          if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
          goto LBL1;
          PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
          (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
          LBL2:
          y = x &= ~x;
          LBL3:
          if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
          if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
          goto LBL3;
          }
          if (x = x) goto LBL2;
          PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
          (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
          }

          E Offline
          E Offline
          elchupathingy
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          SirTimothy wrote:

          Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago.

          How long is a "little while ago"?

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S SirTimothy

            Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

            #include <stdlib.h>
            #include <stdio.h>
            #include <time.h>

            #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

            #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
            #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

            void print_array(int *array) {
            int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
            char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
            --array;
            LBL0:
            if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
            goto LBL0;
            }

            main() {
            int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
            int x, y;
            int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
            void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
            srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
            x ^= x;
            LBL1:
            if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
            goto LBL1;
            PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
            (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
            LBL2:
            y = x &= ~x;
            LBL3:
            if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
            if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
            goto LBL3;
            }
            if (x = x) goto LBL2;
            PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
            (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
            }

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jorgen Andersson
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Are you by any chance a teacher by profession?

            "When did ignorance become a point of view" - Dilbert

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S SirTimothy

              Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

              #include <stdlib.h>
              #include <stdio.h>
              #include <time.h>

              #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

              #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
              #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

              void print_array(int *array) {
              int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
              char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
              --array;
              LBL0:
              if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
              goto LBL0;
              }

              main() {
              int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
              int x, y;
              int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
              void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
              srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
              x ^= x;
              LBL1:
              if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
              goto LBL1;
              PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
              (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
              LBL2:
              y = x &= ~x;
              LBL3:
              if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
              if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
              goto LBL3;
              }
              if (x = x) goto LBL2;
              PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
              (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
              }

              L Offline
              L Offline
              leonej_dt
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Awesome. Not obfuscated at all if you de-obfuscate it in your mind. ;P I particularly liked your all-the-loop-inside-the-if's-conditional-expression concept. :thumbsup:

              If you can play The Dance of Eternity (Dream Theater), then we shall make a band.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S SirTimothy

                Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

                #include <stdlib.h>
                #include <stdio.h>
                #include <time.h>

                #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

                #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
                #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

                void print_array(int *array) {
                int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
                char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
                --array;
                LBL0:
                if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
                goto LBL0;
                }

                main() {
                int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
                int x, y;
                int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
                void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
                srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
                x ^= x;
                LBL1:
                if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
                goto LBL1;
                PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
                (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                LBL2:
                y = x &= ~x;
                LBL3:
                if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
                if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
                goto LBL3;
                }
                if (x = x) goto LBL2;
                PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
                (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                }

                S Offline
                S Offline
                supercat9
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Aside from the preprocessor directives and macros, the formatting of that code reminds me of one of the output from one of my C compilers (which compiles code to an intermediate form, optimizes it, and then shows the equivalent C format).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E elchupathingy

                  SirTimothy wrote:

                  Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago.

                  How long is a "little while ago"?

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  SirTimothy
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  mmm... last week? maybe the week before?

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Q QuiJohn

                    This was for an obfuscated C contest, right? RIGHT? (Must resist the urge to trace through it...)


                    He said, "Boy I'm just old and lonely, But thank you for your concern, Here's wishing you a Happy New Year." I wished him one back in return.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    SirTimothy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    nah, just felt like doing it

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S SirTimothy

                      mmm... last week? maybe the week before?

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Luc Pattyn
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      it sure has a modern je-ne-sais-quoi. :)

                      Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

                      Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S SirTimothy

                        Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

                        #include <stdlib.h>
                        #include <stdio.h>
                        #include <time.h>

                        #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

                        #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
                        #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

                        void print_array(int *array) {
                        int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
                        char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
                        --array;
                        LBL0:
                        if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
                        goto LBL0;
                        }

                        main() {
                        int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
                        int x, y;
                        int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
                        void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
                        srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
                        x ^= x;
                        LBL1:
                        if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
                        goto LBL1;
                        PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
                        (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                        LBL2:
                        y = x &= ~x;
                        LBL3:
                        if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
                        if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
                        goto LBL3;
                        }
                        if (x = x) goto LBL2;
                        PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
                        (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                        }

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        dybs
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        I personally liked the use of function pointers for a simple method call ;P

                        The shout of progress is not "Eureka!" it's "Strange... that's not what i expected". - peterchen

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D dybs

                          I personally liked the use of function pointers for a simple method call ;P

                          The shout of progress is not "Eureka!" it's "Strange... that's not what i expected". - peterchen

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          SirTimothy
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          That, of course, is so that I can change the function name, and only need to change one place where it's used. Gotta think about maintainability and future modifications!

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S SirTimothy

                            Hey folks, I don't generally post on these forums, but I do enjoy the CP newsletters. Anyways, I wanted to share a lovely snippet I wrote a little while ago. Maybe get some opinions? It's a bubble sort in C. It generates 20 random numbers from 0 to 99, and sorts them! Of course, it's fairly straightforward, so I'm sure you could guess that.

                            #include <stdlib.h>
                            #include <stdio.h>
                            #include <time.h>

                            #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

                            #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
                            #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

                            void print_array(int *array) {
                            int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
                            char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" };
                            --array;
                            LBL0:
                            if (PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0)
                            goto LBL0;
                            }

                            main() {
                            int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
                            int x, y;
                            int ofs = iarray - &ofs;
                            void (*prnt_func)(int*) = &print_array;
                            srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
                            x ^= x;
                            LBL1:
                            if ((y = rand(), x < ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = (y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1))
                            goto LBL1;
                            PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
                            (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                            LBL2:
                            y = x &= ~x;
                            LBL3:
                            if (y + 1 < ARRAY_SIZE) {
                            if ((++y, iarray[y] < (y-1)[iarray]) && (y[iarray] ^= iarray[y-1] ^= iarray[y] ^= *(iarray + y - 1), x |= y));
                            goto LBL3;
                            }
                            if (x = x) goto LBL2;
                            PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
                            (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                            }

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lutoslaw
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            Check out the following hidden and tricky features of C: FOR statemnt[^] Commentaries[^] And DO NOT USE GOTO[^]

                            Greetings - Jacek

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lutoslaw

                              Check out the following hidden and tricky features of C: FOR statemnt[^] Commentaries[^] And DO NOT USE GOTO[^]

                              Greetings - Jacek

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              SirTimothy
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Wow! For loops are neat! I rewrote my code, got rid of the gotos, used for loops, and put in some comments like in the article you linked to. I think it's much improved now. I'm especially proud of my reduction of the number of loops. The main sorting part used to involve two nested loops (one inside the other), but I was able to reduce it to a single loop!

                              #include <stdlib.h>
                              #include <stdio.h>
                              #include <time.h>

                              #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

                              #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
                              #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

                              void print_array(int *array) {
                              int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
                              char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" }; /* fmts has two strings in it */
                              for (--array; PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0;); /* These for loops are really neat!
                              I can do a bunch of things all in one line! Do something, test a conditional, do another thing! Or I can leave some of those
                              out, if I don't need them. */
                              for (;;) break; /* I can even do this! */
                              }

                              main() {
                              int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
                              int x, y;
                              int ofs = iarray - &ofs; /* ofs is an offset */
                              void (*prnt_func)/* These comment things are pretty neat too. I can add annotations to my code, without having to hide them in variable names
                              or strings that do nothing. */(int*) = &print_array;
                              "Here's how I would have had to annotate code before. It's kind of a pain.";
                              srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
                              x ^= x; /* ^= looks like a duck. I'm going to call it the "quack operator" */
                              for(;((y = rand/*om number generator*/(), x < /* I'm a comment in the middle of an expression */ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x
                              = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = /*number from 0 to 99*/(y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1));); /* lot's of nested () there! */
                              PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
                              for((*prnt_func)(&ofs+ofs),y^=y,x&=~x;(y+1>=ARRAY_SIZE&&(x&&!(y=x&=~x)))||y+1<ARRAY_SIZE;(++y,iarray[y]<(y-1)
                              [iarray])&&(y[iarray]^=iarray[y-1]^=iarray[y]^=*(iarray+y-1),x|=y)); /* This used to be two loops, when it was with GOTOs,
                              but I was able to
                              reduce it to one. That must be faster, right? It's also still easy to read, so it's a total win-win! */
                              /* That line had a lot of quack operators! */
                              PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
                              (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                              }

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S SirTimothy

                                Wow! For loops are neat! I rewrote my code, got rid of the gotos, used for loops, and put in some comments like in the article you linked to. I think it's much improved now. I'm especially proud of my reduction of the number of loops. The main sorting part used to involve two nested loops (one inside the other), but I was able to reduce it to a single loop!

                                #include <stdlib.h>
                                #include <stdio.h>
                                #include <time.h>

                                #define ARRAY_SIZE 20

                                #define PNT(s, l, a) fprintf(std##s, l, a)
                                #define PNT2LINES(s, l1, l2, e) PNT(s, #l1#e#l2#e, 0)

                                void print_array(int *array) {
                                int x = ARRAY_SIZE;
                                char* fmts[] = { "%d, ", "%d\n" }; /* fmts has two strings in it */
                                for (--array; PNT(out, ((x == 1) & 1)[fmts], *(array = ++array)), --x > 0;); /* These for loops are really neat!
                                I can do a bunch of things all in one line! Do something, test a conditional, do another thing! Or I can leave some of those
                                out, if I don't need them. */
                                for (;;) break; /* I can even do this! */
                                }

                                main() {
                                int iarray[ARRAY_SIZE];
                                int x, y;
                                int ofs = iarray - &ofs; /* ofs is an offset */
                                void (*prnt_func)/* These comment things are pretty neat too. I can add annotations to my code, without having to hide them in variable names
                                or strings that do nothing. */(int*) = &print_array;
                                "Here's how I would have had to annotate code before. It's kind of a pain.";
                                srand((unsigned int)time(NULL));
                                x ^= x; /* ^= looks like a duck. I'm going to call it the "quack operator" */
                                for(;((y = rand/*om number generator*/(), x < /* I'm a comment in the middle of an expression */ARRAY_SIZE) && ((((x
                                = x + 1) - 1)[iarray] = /*number from 0 to 99*/(y - (y / 100) * 100)) || 1));); /* lot's of nested () there! */
                                PNT2LINES(out, Before sort, ---------------, \n);
                                for((*prnt_func)(&ofs+ofs),y^=y,x&=~x;(y+1>=ARRAY_SIZE&&(x&&!(y=x&=~x)))||y+1<ARRAY_SIZE;(++y,iarray[y]<(y-1)
                                [iarray])&&(y[iarray]^=iarray[y-1]^=iarray[y]^=*(iarray+y-1),x|=y)); /* This used to be two loops, when it was with GOTOs,
                                but I was able to
                                reduce it to one. That must be faster, right? It's also still easy to read, so it's a total win-win! */
                                /* That line had a lot of quack operators! */
                                PNT2LINES(out, After sort, ---------------, \n);
                                (*prnt_func)(&ofs + ofs);
                                }

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lutoslaw
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                SirTimothy wrote:

                                for((*prnt_func)(&ofs+ofs),y^=y,x&=~x;(y+1>=ARRAY_SIZE&&(x&&!(y=x&=~x)))||y+1

                                I checked it and it gives correct results. I't amazing. Especially, I don't get why

                                y[iarray]

                                does not cause SEGFAULT or something. Where the O(n^2) complexity is hidden? BTW. I had to implement all sorting algorithms as one of projets on my university. Bubble Sort was among them, but I did not care about performance so much.

                                void Bubble::Sort(Table &table, bool descending)
                                {
                                bool swapped;
                                int size = table.size();
                                int bound = size - 1;
                                int lastSwap = 0;
                                do {
                                swapped = false;
                                for (int i = 0; i < bound; i++)
                                {
                                TableElement t1 = table[i], t2 = table[i + 1];
                                if (descending ? t1 < t2 : t1 > t2) {
                                swap(table[i], table[i+1]);
                                swapped = true;
                                lastSwap = i;
                                }
                                }
                                bound = lastSwap;
                                } while (swapped);
                                }

                                Greetings - Jacek

                                S 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lutoslaw

                                  SirTimothy wrote:

                                  for((*prnt_func)(&ofs+ofs),y^=y,x&=~x;(y+1>=ARRAY_SIZE&&(x&&!(y=x&=~x)))||y+1

                                  I checked it and it gives correct results. I't amazing. Especially, I don't get why

                                  y[iarray]

                                  does not cause SEGFAULT or something. Where the O(n^2) complexity is hidden? BTW. I had to implement all sorting algorithms as one of projets on my university. Bubble Sort was among them, but I did not care about performance so much.

                                  void Bubble::Sort(Table &table, bool descending)
                                  {
                                  bool swapped;
                                  int size = table.size();
                                  int bound = size - 1;
                                  int lastSwap = 0;
                                  do {
                                  swapped = false;
                                  for (int i = 0; i < bound; i++)
                                  {
                                  TableElement t1 = table[i], t2 = table[i + 1];
                                  if (descending ? t1 < t2 : t1 > t2) {
                                  swap(table[i], table[i+1]);
                                  swapped = true;
                                  lastSwap = i;
                                  }
                                  }
                                  bound = lastSwap;
                                  } while (swapped);
                                  }

                                  Greetings - Jacek

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  SirTimothy
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  It is kinda amazing, isn't it? The y[iarray] thing, I've seen in a few different websites, basically the compiler just expands it to *(y + iarray) which is the same as iarray[y] and it carries on its merry way. The O(n^2) complexity is hidden in the single loop, I reset the values of x and y in the conditional (the y=x&=~x bit) when y gets past the array length and x is non-zero. Pretty near impossible to prove n^2 runtime, or to prove correctness, or even to prove that it terminates, but it's fun and it works. I thought about writing some more sorts like this, but haven't gotten to it...

                                  L E 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S SirTimothy

                                    nah, just felt like doing it

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    Gary R Wheeler
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    We're not taking our meds now, are we?

                                    Software Zen: delete this;
                                    Fold With Us![^]

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S SirTimothy

                                      It is kinda amazing, isn't it? The y[iarray] thing, I've seen in a few different websites, basically the compiler just expands it to *(y + iarray) which is the same as iarray[y] and it carries on its merry way. The O(n^2) complexity is hidden in the single loop, I reset the values of x and y in the conditional (the y=x&=~x bit) when y gets past the array length and x is non-zero. Pretty near impossible to prove n^2 runtime, or to prove correctness, or even to prove that it terminates, but it's fun and it works. I thought about writing some more sorts like this, but haven't gotten to it...

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lutoslaw
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      SirTimothy wrote:

                                      the compiler just expands it to *(y + iarray) which is the same as iarray[y]

                                      It relies on a C-specific feature, where size of int is the same as size of an address, doesn't it? In C# int is always a 32-bit integer... I suppose proving n^2 runtime isn't hard. Each obfuscation can be transformated to a more readable form, which is fully equivalent. Step by step, one could get something similar to my code posted above. I suppose. Sometimes when I have a trouble with theory I generate a chart and write "The chart says, that the algorithm is quadratic, isn't it?". Unfortunately not every teacher was satisfied with such report... :rolleyes:

                                      Greetings - Jacek

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S SirTimothy

                                        That, of course, is so that I can change the function name, and only need to change one place where it's used. Gotta think about maintainability and future modifications!

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        johannesnestler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        ... maintainability and future modifications ... hahaha very funny! Can you tell us why you wrote this code? Are you a teacher showing "bad practice"? If one of my programmers would come up with a piece of code like this -> :thumbsdown:

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J johannesnestler

                                          ... maintainability and future modifications ... hahaha very funny! Can you tell us why you wrote this code? Are you a teacher showing "bad practice"? If one of my programmers would come up with a piece of code like this -> :thumbsdown:

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          SirTimothy
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          Nah, not a teacher. Actually, just graduated from university. Why'd I write it? Bored, felt like taking some reasonably clean code and totally butchering it, thought I'd see how ugly I could make it :) Of course, it could be much worse, but whatever, it was fun!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups