Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. How can a social group have 1 member?

How can a social group have 1 member?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comtoolsquestionlounge
74 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CaptainSeeSharp

    Bob Emmett wrote:

    But as we are not women, our caring is irrelevant, as are our opinions.

    No it is not, and I will see to it along with the hundreds of millions of other pro-lifers that abortionist be treated as someone who walks up to a pregnant mother and kicks her stomach, or a drunk driver who wrecks a car and causes a pregnant mother to have a miscarrage.

    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

    No it is not

    Ultimately, it is the woman's choice.

    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

    I will see to it along with the hundreds of millions of other pro-lifers

    You will never see to anything. You are too scared to show your miserable, dependent, subservient, docile, sheep's head above the parapet - even with the support of hundreds of millions.

    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

    abortionist be treated as someone who walks up to a pregnant mother and kicks her stomach, or a drunk driver who wrecks a car and causes a pregnant mother to have a miscarrage.

    You must really hate women to use images like that. Is that why you and other males wish to deprive them of their right to determine whether they abort or not?

    Bob Emmett Which? Race - Your monthly guide to genocide. Published by the New World Order Press.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Except that abortion has everything to do with choice, so your analogies are not even close to relevant.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CaptainSeeSharp
      wrote on last edited by
      #40

      harold aptroot wrote:

      Except that abortion has everything to do with choice

      So does murder, rape, theft, war crimes, and so on.

      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        No it is not

        Ultimately, it is the woman's choice.

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        I will see to it along with the hundreds of millions of other pro-lifers

        You will never see to anything. You are too scared to show your miserable, dependent, subservient, docile, sheep's head above the parapet - even with the support of hundreds of millions.

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        abortionist be treated as someone who walks up to a pregnant mother and kicks her stomach, or a drunk driver who wrecks a car and causes a pregnant mother to have a miscarrage.

        You must really hate women to use images like that. Is that why you and other males wish to deprive them of their right to determine whether they abort or not?

        Bob Emmett Which? Race - Your monthly guide to genocide. Published by the New World Order Press.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CaptainSeeSharp
        wrote on last edited by
        #41

        Bob Emmett wrote:

        Ultimately, it is the woman's choice.

        I have lots of choices to choose from, for instance I choose not to hurt others because it is wrong. Killing a living human baby is wrong on so many levels. It is so helpless yet when the scissors and suction needles come into its nursery to eviscerate it, it does everything it can to try to get away. Ever heard of The Silent Scream? Load it up on youtube.

        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

        L S 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C CaptainSeeSharp

          harold aptroot wrote:

          Except that abortion has everything to do with choice

          So does murder, rape, theft, war crimes, and so on.

          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #42

          Sure.. except in that case you willingly hurt someone else

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CaptainSeeSharp

            Bob Emmett wrote:

            Ultimately, it is the woman's choice.

            I have lots of choices to choose from, for instance I choose not to hurt others because it is wrong. Killing a living human baby is wrong on so many levels. It is so helpless yet when the scissors and suction needles come into its nursery to eviscerate it, it does everything it can to try to get away. Ever heard of The Silent Scream? Load it up on youtube.

            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #43

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            Killing a living human baby is wrong on so many levels.

            And yet you would permit it in very rare circumstances. So, what would justify killing a baby?

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            Ever heard of The Silent Scream?

            Watched it before you were born, sunshine. It is a thoroughly discredited piece of propaganda, sorry. It was probably well meant, but is riddled with inaccuracies, misleading statements, and exaggerations.

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            Load it up on youtube.

            No thanks, there's enough rubbish on television without viewing more on the Web. Rather, you should research fœtal development. (As a father of 4, I did.) You should then be able to spot the inaccuracies for yourself.

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            I have lots of choices to choose from

            FTFY

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            for instance I choose not to hurt others because it is wrong I am scared of retaliation.

            FTFY

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            It is so helpless yet when the scissors and suction needles come into its nursery to eviscerate it, it does everything it can to try to get away.

            You really should research fœtal development.

            Bob Emmett Which? Race - Your monthly guide to genocide. Published by the New World Order Press.

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              Killing a living human baby is wrong on so many levels.

              And yet you would permit it in very rare circumstances. So, what would justify killing a baby?

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              Ever heard of The Silent Scream?

              Watched it before you were born, sunshine. It is a thoroughly discredited piece of propaganda, sorry. It was probably well meant, but is riddled with inaccuracies, misleading statements, and exaggerations.

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              Load it up on youtube.

              No thanks, there's enough rubbish on television without viewing more on the Web. Rather, you should research fœtal development. (As a father of 4, I did.) You should then be able to spot the inaccuracies for yourself.

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              I have lots of choices to choose from

              FTFY

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              for instance I choose not to hurt others because it is wrong I am scared of retaliation.

              FTFY

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              It is so helpless yet when the scissors and suction needles come into its nursery to eviscerate it, it does everything it can to try to get away.

              You really should research fœtal development.

              Bob Emmett Which? Race - Your monthly guide to genocide. Published by the New World Order Press.

              C Offline
              C Offline
              CaptainSeeSharp
              wrote on last edited by
              #44

              You are more of a twerp than Ravel.

              Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

              L 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C CaptainSeeSharp

                You are more of a twerp than Ravel.

                Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #45

                You should try studying biology, instead of blindly believing rightwing-religous-conservatist-etc propaganda. And yes, fetuses of a certain age that are still "abortable" can feel things and move. So can animals. Personally I think it's weird to tell a woman that she must keep a fetus against her will because "we think it's better", especially if men do that. It's as though a bunch of women would tell me it's better not to waste sperm because "so many of those sperms could have been Human Life* !" or something like that, and then stop me if I want to dump my load anywhere but in a fertile woman. Wow that's actually a pretty nice analogy *gives myself a medal* It's also completely insane * Human Life has exactly as much value as you can sell it for, because that's the definition of value. If people go slightly teary-eyes and use a different voice when they say "Human Life" then I know that they're not using their mind to think, but their emotions.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  You should try studying biology, instead of blindly believing rightwing-religous-conservatist-etc propaganda. And yes, fetuses of a certain age that are still "abortable" can feel things and move. So can animals. Personally I think it's weird to tell a woman that she must keep a fetus against her will because "we think it's better", especially if men do that. It's as though a bunch of women would tell me it's better not to waste sperm because "so many of those sperms could have been Human Life* !" or something like that, and then stop me if I want to dump my load anywhere but in a fertile woman. Wow that's actually a pretty nice analogy *gives myself a medal* It's also completely insane * Human Life has exactly as much value as you can sell it for, because that's the definition of value. If people go slightly teary-eyes and use a different voice when they say "Human Life" then I know that they're not using their mind to think, but their emotions.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CaptainSeeSharp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #46

                  You are an idiot. I bet you like to torture animals for fun.

                  Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C CaptainSeeSharp

                    You are an idiot. I bet you like to torture animals for fun.

                    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #47

                    Then you lost. I don't think they would care enough to make it worthwhile for me.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Then you lost. I don't think they would care enough to make it worthwhile for me.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      CaptainSeeSharp
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #48

                      You have already lost much more than I ever will.

                      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C CaptainSeeSharp

                        You have already lost much more than I ever will.

                        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #49

                        Yes indeed, there's not much for you to loose

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Yes indeed, there's not much for you to loose

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          CaptainSeeSharp
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #50

                          harold aptroot wrote:

                          Yes indeed, there's not much for you to loose

                          Apparently there aren't many braincells left for you to lose. Your mother should have had your government health service cut you up with scissors and suck you out through a tube while she had the chance.

                          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                          B L 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • C CaptainSeeSharp

                            harold aptroot wrote:

                            Yes indeed, there's not much for you to loose

                            Apparently there aren't many braincells left for you to lose. Your mother should have had your government health service cut you up with scissors and suck you out through a tube while she had the chance.

                            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #51

                            Any body see a issue with this? Is this not a post advocating abortion purely on the grounds of disagreeing with someones oppinion? So we have CSS who is anti choice abortion for the women but is pro FORCED abortion for those who do not agree with him? Do you think he can see a contradiction here?

                            You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C CaptainSeeSharp

                              Bob Emmett wrote:

                              Ultimately, it is the woman's choice.

                              I have lots of choices to choose from, for instance I choose not to hurt others because it is wrong. Killing a living human baby is wrong on so many levels. It is so helpless yet when the scissors and suction needles come into its nursery to eviscerate it, it does everything it can to try to get away. Ever heard of The Silent Scream? Load it up on youtube.

                              Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              soap brain
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #52

                              Consider this: You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist - a famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you. What do you reckon? Should the government forcibly prevent you from detaching him?

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                You are more of a twerp than Ravel.

                                Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #53

                                CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                You are more of a twerp than Ravel.

                                Ah. The insult. Game, set, and match to me. This is all too easy. You know, all you need to do is actually research a subject before you start spouting off, and then you might hold your own in an argument. I am pro-life, I would rather all pregnancies went to full term and the baby, were it still unwanted, adopted or fostered within a caring family. And I would rather this were the norm than abortion on demand. But, when the above was the norm and abortion was illegal, women chose to have abortions. So, do I wish us to revert to the era of back street abortionists - 'wise women', struck off doctors, quacks, and their like, to the era of covert pregnancy and infanticide? No, thank you, Cap'n Bells.

                                Bob Emmett Which? Race - Your monthly guide to genocide. Published by the New World Order Press.

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                  harold aptroot wrote:

                                  Yes indeed, there's not much for you to loose

                                  Apparently there aren't many braincells left for you to lose. Your mother should have had your government health service cut you up with scissors and suck you out through a tube while she had the chance.

                                  Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #54

                                  I really couldn't care less :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S soap brain

                                    Consider this: You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist - a famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you. What do you reckon? Should the government forcibly prevent you from detaching him?

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    CaptainSeeSharp
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #55

                                    This is the shittiest pro abortion argument I've ever heard. Getting pregnant is a choice, even when it is accidental. The women has a responsibility to that baby regardless if it was accidental or not. If she does not plan on taking care of the baby or making sure the baby will be taken care of by good people, then she is a worthless piece of trash that has no business on this planet. Once the baby enters adulthood then that child (now an adult) has a responsibility for his/her own self.

                                    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                    L S 3 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                      You are more of a twerp than Ravel.

                                      Ah. The insult. Game, set, and match to me. This is all too easy. You know, all you need to do is actually research a subject before you start spouting off, and then you might hold your own in an argument. I am pro-life, I would rather all pregnancies went to full term and the baby, were it still unwanted, adopted or fostered within a caring family. And I would rather this were the norm than abortion on demand. But, when the above was the norm and abortion was illegal, women chose to have abortions. So, do I wish us to revert to the era of back street abortionists - 'wise women', struck off doctors, quacks, and their like, to the era of covert pregnancy and infanticide? No, thank you, Cap'n Bells.

                                      Bob Emmett Which? Race - Your monthly guide to genocide. Published by the New World Order Press.

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      CaptainSeeSharp
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #56

                                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                                      I am pro-life,

                                      Yeah right. Go fuck yourself moron.

                                      Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                        This is the shittiest pro abortion argument I've ever heard. Getting pregnant is a choice, even when it is accidental. The women has a responsibility to that baby regardless if it was accidental or not. If she does not plan on taking care of the baby or making sure the baby will be taken care of by good people, then she is a worthless piece of trash that has no business on this planet. Once the baby enters adulthood then that child (now an adult) has a responsibility for his/her own self.

                                        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #57

                                        Hate to break it to you, but we're not living in a fairytale. You can stick that "responsibility" crap right back into your arse where it came from.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                          Bob Emmett wrote:

                                          I am pro-life,

                                          Yeah right. Go fuck yourself moron.

                                          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #58

                                          CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                          Yeah right. Go f*** yourself moron.

                                          The insult, again!! Game, set, and match to me. Another walk-over - Cap'n Bells has nothing to offer!! Pregnant women can be screened to determine whether they are carrying a Down's Syndrome child. This enables them to choose to have an abortion, if they feel unable to cope with the stresses of bringing up such a child. We never had that test, for any of our children, because we totally rejected abortion as an option, and were prepared to accept and provide for each child, regardless of any disability. That is the real world, with real world decisions, and real world consequences. Now go read DimboWars and immerse yourself in Uncle Al's paranoid universe.

                                          Bob Emmett Which? Race - Your monthly guide to genocide. Published by the New World Order Press.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups