Method in a class
-
How do i check if a method exist in a named class library ? thanks.
-
How do i check if a method exist in a named class library ? thanks.
-
Thnks for the link, But what if i want to get a class name form an assembly? thanks again.
-
Thnks for the link, But what if i want to get a class name form an assembly? thanks again.
-
http://www.dreamincode.net/code/snippet1539.htm[^] Hei.... never heard GOOGLE ? You find the answer there...!!!
I've never heard of Google but I've heard of http://www.dogpile.com/
-
I've never heard of Google but I've heard of http://www.dogpile.com/
systemerror121 wrote:
I've never heard of Google
I take it you've been living in a cave with no Internet access for the last 5 years?
A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave Kreskowiak -
How do i check if a method exist in a named class library ? thanks.
You could use a tool like ILDASM or Reflector to have a look at the code behind the class file.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it. My latest tip/trick - Silverlight *.XCP files. Visit the Hindi forum here.
-
systemerror121 wrote:
I've never heard of Google
I take it you've been living in a cave with no Internet access for the last 5 years?
A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave KreskowiakYou found Bin Laden. :omg:
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
-
http://www.dreamincode.net/code/snippet1539.htm[^] Hei.... never heard GOOGLE ? You find the answer there...!!!
Google is good, and the original question was pretty simple. But there has to be some line beyond which the "just Google it" response is not appropriate. Just because one particular implementation of full text search (i.e. Google) seems to be as good as any alternative at this particular moment in time does not mean that full text search is the most desirable tool to locate information. Quite likely, the OP is not as good at filtering out garbage from unrelated languages and libraries when doing such a search as you are. Quite possibly, his ability to access better-organized sources of information is limited by time and money. I'm not saying your response was wrong in this instance, I am just trying to inject a little perspective into the forum. Do we really want full text search to be the end-all/be-all of obtaining information on the Internet? I don't... my opinion is that once we reach the point where we rely primarily on dumb searching to locate data in a given data store, it's then time to reconsider the design of the data store; or, at a minimum, the use of other tools ought to be explored. If it weren't for Google (and its predecessors), maybe we would all have to open Com, and then open its Amazon subfolder to order books online. It sounds tedious... but if that were the case, then Amazon would probably have a more informative name, like "OnlineBookStore." Who's to say that would not have been a better initial direction for the Internet?
-
Google is good, and the original question was pretty simple. But there has to be some line beyond which the "just Google it" response is not appropriate. Just because one particular implementation of full text search (i.e. Google) seems to be as good as any alternative at this particular moment in time does not mean that full text search is the most desirable tool to locate information. Quite likely, the OP is not as good at filtering out garbage from unrelated languages and libraries when doing such a search as you are. Quite possibly, his ability to access better-organized sources of information is limited by time and money. I'm not saying your response was wrong in this instance, I am just trying to inject a little perspective into the forum. Do we really want full text search to be the end-all/be-all of obtaining information on the Internet? I don't... my opinion is that once we reach the point where we rely primarily on dumb searching to locate data in a given data store, it's then time to reconsider the design of the data store; or, at a minimum, the use of other tools ought to be explored. If it weren't for Google (and its predecessors), maybe we would all have to open Com, and then open its Amazon subfolder to order books online. It sounds tedious... but if that were the case, then Amazon would probably have a more informative name, like "OnlineBookStore." Who's to say that would not have been a better initial direction for the Internet?
And using Google, you may find your question posted by someone else with a "let me google that for you" answer only...