Genericize access to variables

[Paul Michalik]

David Knechtges wrote:

Is there a way to do that?

No, at least if I understand what you want... However, why would you want to do that? What's wrong with:

Label[] labela = {
labela0,
labela1,
labela2,
labela3,
};
//...
for (int i=0;i<4;i++)
labela[i].Text = "something";

modified on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 5:55 PM

[AspDotNetDev]

This answer was already posted hours ago.

[Forum Guidelines]

[Lukasz Nowakowski]

You can also try reflection if you really really really really really really really really must do it this way and not using array/collection (depending on a situation).

Don't forget to rate answer, that helped you. It will allow other people find their answers faster.

[Alexander Voronin]

Try to use this construction:

this.GetType().GetField("variablename")

This should work for c# but better try to avoid such kind of code. Other languages has different RTTI, for example in c/c++ this is impossible at all.

[ExportedNorwegian]

Not sure about the performance implications of FindControl.. But this one is pretty close to what you originally wrote

for (int i=1;i<4;i++)
(Controls.FindControl("labela" + i.ToString()) as Label).Text = "something";

[BC3Tech]

how about lambda? :)

foreach (Control l in Controls.Cast().Where(c => c.Name.StartsWith("sumLabel")))
l.Text = l.Name;

[Dave Buhl]

This is not exactly what you were asking for but is an alternative using binding. This may be overkill for what you are trying to do but it would be more elegant. Bind your labels as you create them to an object of a class that implements INotifyChanged then when you change the property of the object each label will be updated without having to work loops. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/639894[^] Dave

[JaceTheAce]

Array.ForEach(new Control[] { labela1, labela2, labela3 }, delegate(Control c) { c.Text = "something"; });

[Lost User]

Lambda's look cool :cool: It's either searching through the collection and keeping the result around, or hardcoding them in advance. Attributes that mark a set of fields as a group might be another option, but that would add a bit more complexity. No, I think I like the lambda better. Would also be cool combined with a regex :) Nearly forgot, but that cast in my original query would be redundant, as we'd only need to store labels;

class Form1
{
IEnumerable summingLabels;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();

	summingLabels =
		from c in Controls.Cast().AsQueryable()
		where c.GetType() == typeof(Label)
		&& c.Name.StartsWith("label")
		select c as Label;

	// later on, when you need them
	foreach(Label l in summingLabels)
		l.Text = l.Location.ToString();
}

}

I are Troll :suss:

[Shani Natav]

Or Maybe to make it nicer with no casting and type checking:

summingLabels =
from c in Controls.OfType()
where c.Name.StartsWith("label")
select c;

	// later on, when you need them
	foreach(Label l in summingLabels)
		l.Text = l.Location.ToString();

[Lost User]

Yup, works, and more concise and readable :thumbsup:

I are Troll :suss:

[RMcEachern]

How to do this is quite simple, but not obvious since we do not normally think of dimensioning a variable as a control type. The simplest way (to me) is to dimension an array of labels, Label(1), Label(2) etc. as Label. Then set each member of the array equal to each of the labels you want to control a property for. Then you can write a loop setting a property of each label in the array as an iterated function, such as: Dim Label(1) as Label Dim Label(2) as Label ... Label(1) = LabelA Label(2) = LabelB ... For x = 1 to 5 Label(x).text = "Text " & x Next (Sorry, I am an old VB.NET programmer, but the concept is the same in all :-D ) I think this is what you want, works great for me, and works for the other common controls, too.

[Lost User]

take a look at the dictionary class