Prevent Screen Capturing
-
Hi, Is there a way to avoid taking screen shots of my application? I need to avoid Print Screen as well as other utilities doing the same. Any suggestions or hints are greatly welcome. :) Thank you.
- ns ami -
No. If it's important enough it will always end up on Wikileaks. ;)
-
Hi, Is there a way to avoid taking screen shots of my application? I need to avoid Print Screen as well as other utilities doing the same. Any suggestions or hints are greatly welcome. :) Thank you.
- ns ami -
"Is there a way to avoid taking screen shots of my application"? Don't write application that can be installed on system that have a print screen function the used payed for! NOTE: it seem a recently recurring question: "how can disable this or that OS feature to make my application safe for these o those reason ???" You are not the owner of your user's computer. Modifying the system behavior in not legal. (And I -an may people like me- retain also very immoral. I can seriously taking in consideration not to buy your application). Unless you own the computers but ... in that case you better configure the system appropriately that writing application to make the entire system their only-own slave. What happen when ten different application are needed on a system each one wants it to behave differently?
2 bugs found. > recompile ... 65534 bugs found. :doh:
modified on Wednesday, September 8, 2010 8:14 AM
-
Hi, Is there a way to avoid taking screen shots of my application? I need to avoid Print Screen as well as other utilities doing the same. Any suggestions or hints are greatly welcome. :) Thank you.
- ns ami -
Are you embarrassed about your UI design? I suppose you might be able to RegisterHotKey and grab PrntScr for yourself. But users could run some other screen capturing program. Using DirectXYZ won't help either - people take screen captures from games, after all. You could look to replace the shell, so people can't run other applications. But will your software also come with an armed guard to stop people from taking photos of the screen? Placing their flat screen on a scanner? Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
-
Are you embarrassed about your UI design? I suppose you might be able to RegisterHotKey and grab PrntScr for yourself. But users could run some other screen capturing program. Using DirectXYZ won't help either - people take screen captures from games, after all. You could look to replace the shell, so people can't run other applications. But will your software also come with an armed guard to stop people from taking photos of the screen? Placing their flat screen on a scanner? Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder? I mean, since the scanner has a bright lightsource i supose the reflection of that (on the screen) would supress the light coming from the display. If there's a way to turn the scanner's lightsource off (or to not turn in on in the first place) and do the scanning than i supose it could work...but it would probably produce some fancy interference/refresh-asynchronity artifacts.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
-
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder? I mean, since the scanner has a bright lightsource i supose the reflection of that (on the screen) would supress the light coming from the display. If there's a way to turn the scanner's lightsource off (or to not turn in on in the first place) and do the scanning than i supose it could work...but it would probably produce some fancy interference/refresh-asynchronity artifacts.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
-
Are you embarrassed about your UI design? I suppose you might be able to RegisterHotKey and grab PrntScr for yourself. But users could run some other screen capturing program. Using DirectXYZ won't help either - people take screen captures from games, after all. You could look to replace the shell, so people can't run other applications. But will your software also come with an armed guard to stop people from taking photos of the screen? Placing their flat screen on a scanner? Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
Are you embarrassed about your UI design?
:laugh: You're The Best! :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Hi, Is there a way to avoid taking screen shots of my application? I need to avoid Print Screen as well as other utilities doing the same. Any suggestions or hints are greatly welcome. :) Thank you.
- ns ami -
I could take a picture of the screen ... so ... do the math.
Watched code never compiles.
-
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder? I mean, since the scanner has a bright lightsource i supose the reflection of that (on the screen) would supress the light coming from the display. If there's a way to turn the scanner's lightsource off (or to not turn in on in the first place) and do the scanning than i supose it could work...but it would probably produce some fancy interference/refresh-asynchronity artifacts.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
Code-o-mat wrote:
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder
I'm not sure myself. I'm pretty sure a CRT would not work. But an LCD/TFT? It's almost worth an experiment! Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
-
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
Are you embarrassed about your UI design?
:laugh: You're The Best! :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]CPallini wrote:
You're The Best!
Just a little out of practise! Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
-
Are you embarrassed about your UI design? I suppose you might be able to RegisterHotKey and grab PrntScr for yourself. But users could run some other screen capturing program. Using DirectXYZ won't help either - people take screen captures from games, after all. You could look to replace the shell, so people can't run other applications. But will your software also come with an armed guard to stop people from taking photos of the screen? Placing their flat screen on a scanner? Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
Are you embarrassed about your UI design?
Never! But if the application is a viewer for a confidential document? And if the vendor never interested in redistribution of that document without his approval? :)
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
I suppose you might be able to RegisterHotKey and grab PrntScr for yourself.
Thank you. I have to check that and similar things to avoid Print Screen.
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
But users could run some other screen capturing program. Using DirectXYZ won't help either - people take screen captures from games, after all.
Yes. But trying to avoid such things to the maximum possible extent.
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
You could look to replace the shell, so people can't run other applications. But will your software also come with an armed guard to stop people from taking photos of the screen? Placing their flat screen on a scanner?
:D
- ns ami -
-
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
Are you embarrassed about your UI design?
Never! But if the application is a viewer for a confidential document? And if the vendor never interested in redistribution of that document without his approval? :)
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
I suppose you might be able to RegisterHotKey and grab PrntScr for yourself.
Thank you. I have to check that and similar things to avoid Print Screen.
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
But users could run some other screen capturing program. Using DirectXYZ won't help either - people take screen captures from games, after all.
Yes. But trying to avoid such things to the maximum possible extent.
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
You could look to replace the shell, so people can't run other applications. But will your software also come with an armed guard to stop people from taking photos of the screen? Placing their flat screen on a scanner?
:D
- ns ami -
Nishad S wrote:
But if the application is a viewer for a confidential document?
That was my guess, really. My suggestion about the UI was very tongue in cheek. But the points given to you are very good ones. a) It's not your computer - but that might not be true, if the environment is provided for this purpose. Think train ticket purchasing kiosks. b) If a person can see it, they can use a camera, pen and paper, or even just their own brain cells to remember. If you can trust a user not take a photo, you can trust them not to use Print Screen. If the computer is under your control (Let's say you work for the CIA in IT), then it doesn't matter if they print screen - they have no usable USB slots to export the data! This strikes me as a daft requirement by someone who has not given it a lot of thought. Now, which Clancy novel was it, where every time a document was shown to someone, it had a deliberate error, so they'd know who the leak was...? I think the only way you can stop people is to make it a firable offence to steal, and to not let unauthorised people play! Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
-
Code-o-mat wrote:
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder
I'm not sure myself. I'm pretty sure a CRT would not work. But an LCD/TFT? It's almost worth an experiment! Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
I wonder what my colegues here would say if i were to try that... :) They'd probably say i am a few bits short of an integer...
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
-
Nishad S wrote:
But if the application is a viewer for a confidential document?
That was my guess, really. My suggestion about the UI was very tongue in cheek. But the points given to you are very good ones. a) It's not your computer - but that might not be true, if the environment is provided for this purpose. Think train ticket purchasing kiosks. b) If a person can see it, they can use a camera, pen and paper, or even just their own brain cells to remember. If you can trust a user not take a photo, you can trust them not to use Print Screen. If the computer is under your control (Let's say you work for the CIA in IT), then it doesn't matter if they print screen - they have no usable USB slots to export the data! This strikes me as a daft requirement by someone who has not given it a lot of thought. Now, which Clancy novel was it, where every time a document was shown to someone, it had a deliberate error, so they'd know who the leak was...? I think the only way you can stop people is to make it a firable offence to steal, and to not let unauthorised people play! Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer wrote:
That was my guess, really.
Great! :) Your points are really valuable. I too believe that 100% foolproof software cannot be created. But I am trying to increase the difficulty to take unauthorized copies so that its frequency will get decreased. Thank you for your suggestions!
- ns ami -
-
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder? I mean, since the scanner has a bright lightsource i supose the reflection of that (on the screen) would supress the light coming from the display. If there's a way to turn the scanner's lightsource off (or to not turn in on in the first place) and do the scanning than i supose it could work...but it would probably produce some fancy interference/refresh-asynchronity artifacts.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
Code-o-mat wrote:
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder?
I probably lose nerd points for speaking this out loud... you could also use a digital camera for that matter. :) Btw, it works. Kind of. I tried and put my laptop screen on a scanner and the result was very stripy and hard to read, still it was possible to identify icons in the background and Google logo in Firefox. Mystery solved?
-
Code-o-mat wrote:
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder?
I probably lose nerd points for speaking this out loud... you could also use a digital camera for that matter. :) Btw, it works. Kind of. I tried and put my laptop screen on a scanner and the result was very stripy and hard to read, still it was possible to identify icons in the background and Google logo in Firefox. Mystery solved?
Yeah, i know how it sounds but still, it's not that obvious if you think about it...
Moak wrote:
you could also use a digital camera for that matter.
with flash of course, don't forget the flash so your screen won't look too dark. :P
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
-
Yeah, i know how it sounds but still, it's not that obvious if you think about it...
Moak wrote:
you could also use a digital camera for that matter.
with flash of course, don't forget the flash so your screen won't look too dark. :P
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
Code-o-mat wrote:
Yeah, i know how it sounds but still, it's not that obvious if you think about it...
I know what you mean, once I had the idea in my head I had to try it out. :)
-
Code-o-mat wrote:
Just a side-question: would placing your flatscreen on a scanner actually work i wonder?
I probably lose nerd points for speaking this out loud... you could also use a digital camera for that matter. :) Btw, it works. Kind of. I tried and put my laptop screen on a scanner and the result was very stripy and hard to read, still it was possible to identify icons in the background and Google logo in Firefox. Mystery solved?
Moak wrote:
Btw, it works
And to think, I thought I was talking rubbish... Iain.
I am one of "those foreigners coming over here and stealing our jobs". Yay me!
-
Code-o-mat wrote:
Yeah, i know how it sounds but still, it's not that obvious if you think about it...
I know what you mean, once I had the idea in my head I had to try it out. :)
And? Did you get true holographic imagery as i suspect one would if one had to try? :P :)
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
-
And? Did you get true holographic imagery as i suspect one would if one had to try? :P :)
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > "It doesn't work, fix it" does not qualify as a bug report. < > Amazing what new features none of the programmers working on the project ever heard of you can learn about when reading what the marketing guys wrote about it. <
Hehe. :) What wonders me that the scanned quality is so bad, maybe has something to do with overexposing/interference from two light sources (scanner and screen).