CSS, what kind of a nutter are you?
-
A David Icke nutter? Or an Alex Jones nutter? Just Curious.
-
A David Icke nutter? Or an Alex Jones nutter? Just Curious.
-
A David Icke nutter? Or an Alex Jones nutter? Just Curious.
I'm not a nutter, I'm a truthteller. I prefer Alex Jones, he is more down to earth.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
I'm not a nutter, I'm a truthteller. I prefer Alex Jones, he is more down to earth.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
I'd go with the nutter option if I was you. At least that way you could use it if anything came up in court...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
-
I'd go with the nutter option if I was you. At least that way you could use it if anything came up in court...
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
So you admit that political speech is becoming a criminal offense and that political dissidents are targeted for psychological domination through forced medicating and institutionalizing just like in the soviet era.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
So you admit that political speech is becoming a criminal offense and that political dissidents are targeted for psychological domination through forced medicating and institutionalizing just like in the soviet era.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
No, I meant that when you next appear in court you can plead insanity. Insanitary as well, if you wish.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
-
I'm not a nutter, I'm a truthteller. I prefer Alex Jones, he is more down to earth.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I'm a truthteller.
And an engineer, a pharmacist, a chef and whatnotelse...
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
-
So you admit that political speech is becoming a criminal offense and that political dissidents are targeted for psychological domination through forced medicating and institutionalizing just like in the soviet era.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
psychological domination through forced medicating and institutionalizing just like in the soviet era.
You know, after a few visits to the Back Passage, I'm gaining some sympathy for the Ludovico Technique.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
psychological domination through forced medicating and institutionalizing just like in the soviet era.
You know, after a few visits to the Back Passage, I'm gaining some sympathy for the Ludovico Technique.
Keith Barrow wrote:
after a few visits to the Back Passage
Sick X|
Keith Barrow wrote:
I'm gaining some sympathy for the Ludovico Technique.
Pure trash.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Keith Barrow wrote:
after a few visits to the Back Passage
Sick X|
Keith Barrow wrote:
I'm gaining some sympathy for the Ludovico Technique.
Pure trash.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Sick
Well, how else would you describe this "forum" it is generally full of sh*t?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Pure trash.
In what sense?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Sick
Well, how else would you describe this "forum" it is generally full of sh*t?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Pure trash.
In what sense?
Keith Barrow wrote:
Well, how else would you describe this "forum" it is generally full of sh*t?
With you dabbling some fly covered shit on my pure threads I'd call it The Room With Keith the Sack of Shit.
Keith Barrow wrote:
In what sense?
Anyone who would subject someone to torture or condone it is sick in the head.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Keith Barrow wrote:
Well, how else would you describe this "forum" it is generally full of sh*t?
With you dabbling some fly covered shit on my pure threads I'd call it The Room With Keith the Sack of Shit.
Keith Barrow wrote:
In what sense?
Anyone who would subject someone to torture or condone it is sick in the head.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
With you dabbling
I think you mean dabbing, I mean English is your first language is it not?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
my pure threads
In what sense are your threads pure? As soon as someone criticises you or your beloved Ru Paul/ Ron Jeremey or whoever he is, you are straight in with a pretty nasty ad-hominem argument. This is obviously all you have the intellectual capacity to muster. For example you have accused one member of Paedophilia for no justifiable reason, he just p*ssed you off = epic fail
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Anyone who would subject someone to torture or condone it is sick in the head.
It is interesting that you think that I said I would, or would condone torture. Your OP said "psychological domination through forced medicating and institutionalizing" which pretty much sums up the Ludovico Technique. What I made was an obviously flippant comment, that some people have such stupid, extreme and/or paranoid views that I was gaining sympathy with the idea of using the aforesaid technique on such. At no point did I say such a technique should be applied. I think this highlights your increasing divorce from madam reality.
-
I'm not a nutter, I'm a truthteller. I prefer Alex Jones, he is more down to earth.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I'm not a nutter, I'm a truthteller.
Today's "truth" is tomorrow's toilet paper. Script monkey would be a more accurate term to describe what you're doing. I've never seen you question or cross-examine your favourite sources of "news."
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I'm not a nutter, I'm a truthteller.
Today's "truth" is tomorrow's toilet paper. Script monkey would be a more accurate term to describe what you're doing. I've never seen you question or cross-examine your favourite sources of "news."
The truth is the truth is the truth. You can either believe in lies, or know the truth.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
The truth is the truth is the truth. You can either believe in lies, or know the truth.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You can either believe in lies, or know the truth.
Most people do both. At once. Smart enough to see facts in everyday reading, but never give them a second thought, believing whatever tugs at their heartstrings, the opinion editorials. Believe me, you are not much better. The problem is people don't like to think and solve puzzles on their own. Their idea of "food for thought" is pre-cooked, pre-chewed and served on a plate, something they can read and smugly think they "know the truth," a 'truth' that fits their reality.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You can either believe in lies, or know the truth.
Most people do both. At once. Smart enough to see facts in everyday reading, but never give them a second thought, believing whatever tugs at their heartstrings, the opinion editorials. Believe me, you are not much better. The problem is people don't like to think and solve puzzles on their own. Their idea of "food for thought" is pre-cooked, pre-chewed and served on a plate, something they can read and smugly think they "know the truth," a 'truth' that fits their reality.
M σ r r ı0 wrote:
Believe me, you are not much better.
Why would I believe you when I know that you are wrong?
M σ r r ı0 wrote:
The problem is people don't like to think and solve puzzles on their own.
That would make them a conspiracy theorist if they actually think and solve puzzles on there own.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
M σ r r ı0 wrote:
Believe me, you are not much better.
Why would I believe you when I know that you are wrong?
M σ r r ı0 wrote:
The problem is people don't like to think and solve puzzles on their own.
That would make them a conspiracy theorist if they actually think and solve puzzles on there own.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Why would I believe you when I know that you are wrong?
Why would I believe that you are any better when I know that you don't question or cross-examine any of AJ's opinions, or any of the so-called 'news'? "When the shoe fits, we must repeat" :laugh:
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
That would make them a conspiracy theorist if they actually think and solve puzzles on there own.
It would make them a thinker and a puzzle solver ;P Recomending LSD and 'shrooms "because it breaks conditioning" would make one much more of a conspiracy theorist
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Why would I believe you when I know that you are wrong?
Why would I believe that you are any better when I know that you don't question or cross-examine any of AJ's opinions, or any of the so-called 'news'? "When the shoe fits, we must repeat" :laugh:
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
That would make them a conspiracy theorist if they actually think and solve puzzles on there own.
It would make them a thinker and a puzzle solver ;P Recomending LSD and 'shrooms "because it breaks conditioning" would make one much more of a conspiracy theorist
Are you a programmer? You are very new here, yet you've been reading the forums for some time. How did you discover the backroom?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Are you a programmer? You are very new here, yet you've been reading the forums for some time. How did you discover the backroom?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
A front end developer (Javascript+DOM+CSS, Flash and SL), though i'm also quite familiar with the various serverside stuff. I've known this place since middle of '05, and lurked on and off for quite some time, posting under another name somewhere around '07 until I left again... I've only been back for about a month, but I do remember you from a few years ago, before you became so involved in the conspiracy stuff. You had that big blocky ASCII art sig. As for the back room, that's what used to be the old Soapbox. Chris started the new one due to excessive politics, and kept the old one as the Back Room, for that exact purpose. "Enter at Your Own Risk".... And then I remember Kyle with his BDO tag rampage, and the majority of the members. I've seen a lot of stuff and also missed a lot of stuff. A newbie by name only ;)
-
A front end developer (Javascript+DOM+CSS, Flash and SL), though i'm also quite familiar with the various serverside stuff. I've known this place since middle of '05, and lurked on and off for quite some time, posting under another name somewhere around '07 until I left again... I've only been back for about a month, but I do remember you from a few years ago, before you became so involved in the conspiracy stuff. You had that big blocky ASCII art sig. As for the back room, that's what used to be the old Soapbox. Chris started the new one due to excessive politics, and kept the old one as the Back Room, for that exact purpose. "Enter at Your Own Risk".... And then I remember Kyle with his BDO tag rampage, and the majority of the members. I've seen a lot of stuff and also missed a lot of stuff. A newbie by name only ;)
