Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Here, Capn, you may find this interesting...

Here, Capn, you may find this interesting...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomquestion
12 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    ... an editorial in the Times advocating a return to a gold standard[^]. If you're going to rant, it can't hurt to know what you're going on about. ;)

    L u n a t i c F r i n g e

    L W 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      ... an editorial in the Times advocating a return to a gold standard[^]. If you're going to rant, it can't hurt to know what you're going on about. ;)

      L u n a t i c F r i n g e

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      LunaticFringe wrote:

      an editorial in the Times advocating a return to a gold standard

      Oh, only the NYT not The Times. Thank God. I thought the ghost of Winston Spencer Churchill was penning an op-ed.

      A war with Japan! But why should there be a war with Japan? I do not believe there is the slightest chance of it in our lifetime. Winston Spencer Churchill, 1924.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        LunaticFringe wrote:

        an editorial in the Times advocating a return to a gold standard

        Oh, only the NYT not The Times. Thank God. I thought the ghost of Winston Spencer Churchill was penning an op-ed.

        A war with Japan! But why should there be a war with Japan? I do not believe there is the slightest chance of it in our lifetime. Winston Spencer Churchill, 1924.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Yes. The NY Times. The only Times, not just another Murdoch rag. ;P ;) :-D

        L u n a t i c F r i n g e

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          ... an editorial in the Times advocating a return to a gold standard[^]. If you're going to rant, it can't hurt to know what you're going on about. ;)

          L u n a t i c F r i n g e

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          You lot live in la la land.

          "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Yes. The NY Times. The only Times, not just another Murdoch rag. ;P ;) :-D

            L u n a t i c F r i n g e

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            LunaticFringe wrote:

            just another Murdoch rag

            Alas, all too true. :sigh:

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              You lot live in la la land.

              "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dalek Dave
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              No, then it would be the Los Angeles Times.

              ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dalek Dave

                No, then it would be the Los Angeles Times.

                ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]

                R Offline
                R Offline
                R Giskard Reventlov
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                When in Rome, etc; when in LA do what the fuck you want...

                "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  ... an editorial in the Times advocating a return to a gold standard[^]. If you're going to rant, it can't hurt to know what you're going on about. ;)

                  L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                  W Offline
                  W Offline
                  wolfbinary
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I propose we base our money on unobtainum instead. It's just as sane and just as likely to blow up in our faces when greed takes over. As the article states 20.67th of an ounce of gold equaled 1 dollar. So if they pass a law and change it to 19th or 17th you get the same quantitative easy as you would printing money or creating from thin air paper dollars. How about .00001th of an ounce per dollar? So much for hard currency. When we stop making hocus pocus out of work maybe we'll make some real progress. To many people don't do anything productive for either themselves or society. Wallstreet is proof of that.

                  That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                  L I I 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • W wolfbinary

                    I propose we base our money on unobtainum instead. It's just as sane and just as likely to blow up in our faces when greed takes over. As the article states 20.67th of an ounce of gold equaled 1 dollar. So if they pass a law and change it to 19th or 17th you get the same quantitative easy as you would printing money or creating from thin air paper dollars. How about .00001th of an ounce per dollar? So much for hard currency. When we stop making hocus pocus out of work maybe we'll make some real progress. To many people don't do anything productive for either themselves or society. Wallstreet is proof of that.

                    That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Yeah, I chuckled when I read that bit. One 20th of an ounce, huh? That may need a bit of adjustment. :laugh:

                    L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W wolfbinary

                      I propose we base our money on unobtainum instead. It's just as sane and just as likely to blow up in our faces when greed takes over. As the article states 20.67th of an ounce of gold equaled 1 dollar. So if they pass a law and change it to 19th or 17th you get the same quantitative easy as you would printing money or creating from thin air paper dollars. How about .00001th of an ounce per dollar? So much for hard currency. When we stop making hocus pocus out of work maybe we'll make some real progress. To many people don't do anything productive for either themselves or society. Wallstreet is proof of that.

                      That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                      I Offline
                      I Offline
                      IdUnknown
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Our money is already based on Unobtainium. Where do you think the Fed get $600 Billion for QE2?

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I IdUnknown

                        Our money is already based on Unobtainium. Where do you think the Fed get $600 Billion for QE2?

                        W Offline
                        W Offline
                        wolfbinary
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        That was the joke of it. Money based on anything is just as futile and secure as airport security. More pointlessness for people who find comfort in illusions.

                        That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W wolfbinary

                          I propose we base our money on unobtainum instead. It's just as sane and just as likely to blow up in our faces when greed takes over. As the article states 20.67th of an ounce of gold equaled 1 dollar. So if they pass a law and change it to 19th or 17th you get the same quantitative easy as you would printing money or creating from thin air paper dollars. How about .00001th of an ounce per dollar? So much for hard currency. When we stop making hocus pocus out of work maybe we'll make some real progress. To many people don't do anything productive for either themselves or society. Wallstreet is proof of that.

                          That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Ian Shlasko
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          wolfbinary wrote:

                          To many people don't do anything productive for either themselves or society. Wallstreet is proof of that.

                          So true... That's why I tell people I have a "B-Ark Job" (Writing software for a hedge fund)... For those who don't immediately understand the reference, go look up the Golgafrinchans from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. In my defense, I only do this to pay the bills, and hope to eventually become a writer whose hobby is programming, instead of a programmer whose hobby is writing :)

                          Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                          Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups