Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. So I'm reading an article and...

So I'm reading an article and...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comhelpquestionannouncement
9 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    wolfbinary
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    article I was reading[^] So I'm reading an article and I usually like to read the comments for amusement when I found this jem: I think that every person on unemployment should work for the state or federal government on a part time basis. this would free up the federal $ to pay for their benefits and we could lay off or fire a lot of the federal and state employees freeing up even more funds. $300 a week at the federal minimum wage is aprox 33 hrs a week. problem solved and a savings at that. Did this guy not get the idea that government people who get fired or layed off draw unemployment too? Aside from that it's not a bad idea. We'd get a lot more service and keep people productive and trained in some meaningful way. The first thing to go was a person's dignity in this recession.

    That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

    I OriginalGriffO L D 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • W wolfbinary

      article I was reading[^] So I'm reading an article and I usually like to read the comments for amusement when I found this jem: I think that every person on unemployment should work for the state or federal government on a part time basis. this would free up the federal $ to pay for their benefits and we could lay off or fire a lot of the federal and state employees freeing up even more funds. $300 a week at the federal minimum wage is aprox 33 hrs a week. problem solved and a savings at that. Did this guy not get the idea that government people who get fired or layed off draw unemployment too? Aside from that it's not a bad idea. We'd get a lot more service and keep people productive and trained in some meaningful way. The first thing to go was a person's dignity in this recession.

      That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

      I Offline
      I Offline
      Ian Shlasko
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Unemployment aid is always a tricky issue... I mean, you don't want to let people starve and go homeless, but on the other hand, you want to encourage them to get back on their feet, and not get them too reliant on government hand-outs. The problem with that guy's idea, though, is that if you replace many of the permanent government employees with people on unemployment, productivity drops. If you think that line at the DMV is bad NOW, imagine it if the place was being staffed by a bunch of people who are just there part-time to earn their unemployment checks. Now, infrastructure investments, on the other hand... Better highways, high-speed rail lines, etc. There's a huge available labor pool that the government should be using NOW to get us into the 21st century. It's a proven formula... The government hires lots of contractors to build out infrastructure, those contractors need to hire lots of temporary labor to fulfill those contracts. The national infrastructure is improved, a lot of unemployed people have jobs for a while, and everyone benefits. But then, the economy is already recovering, so maybe it's too late... Guess we'll just stay in the 1900s, while Europe and Japan get high-speed rail lines and modern communications systems.

      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
      Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Ian Shlasko

        Unemployment aid is always a tricky issue... I mean, you don't want to let people starve and go homeless, but on the other hand, you want to encourage them to get back on their feet, and not get them too reliant on government hand-outs. The problem with that guy's idea, though, is that if you replace many of the permanent government employees with people on unemployment, productivity drops. If you think that line at the DMV is bad NOW, imagine it if the place was being staffed by a bunch of people who are just there part-time to earn their unemployment checks. Now, infrastructure investments, on the other hand... Better highways, high-speed rail lines, etc. There's a huge available labor pool that the government should be using NOW to get us into the 21st century. It's a proven formula... The government hires lots of contractors to build out infrastructure, those contractors need to hire lots of temporary labor to fulfill those contracts. The national infrastructure is improved, a lot of unemployed people have jobs for a while, and everyone benefits. But then, the economy is already recovering, so maybe it's too late... Guess we'll just stay in the 1900s, while Europe and Japan get high-speed rail lines and modern communications systems.

        Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
        Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

        P Offline
        P Offline
        pseudonym67
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        In defence of our shoddiness I like to point out the Virgin run our high speed rail they dont even know how to spell effishshunsie

        pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Personal Music Player[^]

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W wolfbinary

          article I was reading[^] So I'm reading an article and I usually like to read the comments for amusement when I found this jem: I think that every person on unemployment should work for the state or federal government on a part time basis. this would free up the federal $ to pay for their benefits and we could lay off or fire a lot of the federal and state employees freeing up even more funds. $300 a week at the federal minimum wage is aprox 33 hrs a week. problem solved and a savings at that. Did this guy not get the idea that government people who get fired or layed off draw unemployment too? Aside from that it's not a bad idea. We'd get a lot more service and keep people productive and trained in some meaningful way. The first thing to go was a person's dignity in this recession.

          That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

          OriginalGriffO Offline
          OriginalGriffO Offline
          OriginalGriff
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          The real problem is it doesn't save a thing. The posts can't be skilled (training would be required, or they would already be doing the job), or responsible (since you don't know who they are and how they will handle it), or complex (since they in theory will bugger off as soon as they have a job), or handling confidential material (since you don't know what they will do with it). In addition, when are they supposed to look for a job - I assume the government job would be in normal office hours, just like the jobs they are looking for. So it's shitwork, for shitpay - and all the people who do it at the moment become unemployed and have to do it anyway, for less money. Only now, you need a large number of trained, responsible government employees to monitor them, check on them, handle their vacations, sickness, punish them for non-attendance and poor work standard, etc. And you can bet those guys will want more money to do it than the original jobholders... So what you end up with is a class of very pissed off workers, who cause more drain on public finances and create a bigger government. Just what we need! ;P

          Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

          "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
          "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P pseudonym67

            In defence of our shoddiness I like to point out the Virgin run our high speed rail they dont even know how to spell effishshunsie

            pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Personal Music Player[^]

            L Offline
            L Offline
            LloydA111
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            What? :doh:


            See if you can crack this: fb29a481781fe9b3fb8de57cda45fbef

            The unofficial awesome history of Code Project's Bob! "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."

            W 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L LloydA111

              What? :doh:


              See if you can crack this: fb29a481781fe9b3fb8de57cda45fbef

              The unofficial awesome history of Code Project's Bob! "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."

              W Offline
              W Offline
              wolfbinary
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I don't understand him either.

              That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W wolfbinary

                article I was reading[^] So I'm reading an article and I usually like to read the comments for amusement when I found this jem: I think that every person on unemployment should work for the state or federal government on a part time basis. this would free up the federal $ to pay for their benefits and we could lay off or fire a lot of the federal and state employees freeing up even more funds. $300 a week at the federal minimum wage is aprox 33 hrs a week. problem solved and a savings at that. Did this guy not get the idea that government people who get fired or layed off draw unemployment too? Aside from that it's not a bad idea. We'd get a lot more service and keep people productive and trained in some meaningful way. The first thing to go was a person's dignity in this recession.

                That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I havebeen suggesting this for years, except that the unemployed work for tax payers.

                "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W wolfbinary

                  article I was reading[^] So I'm reading an article and I usually like to read the comments for amusement when I found this jem: I think that every person on unemployment should work for the state or federal government on a part time basis. this would free up the federal $ to pay for their benefits and we could lay off or fire a lot of the federal and state employees freeing up even more funds. $300 a week at the federal minimum wage is aprox 33 hrs a week. problem solved and a savings at that. Did this guy not get the idea that government people who get fired or layed off draw unemployment too? Aside from that it's not a bad idea. We'd get a lot more service and keep people productive and trained in some meaningful way. The first thing to go was a person's dignity in this recession.

                  That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Distind
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I have a question, how is someone who is effectively drafted by the government supposed to find a job working at least 33 hours a week? At best you'd have people who never showed up because they were attempting to find a job. Assuming they're actually doing what unemployment benefits are supposed to let you do. You want a group of people who are supposed to be looking for work, forced to hold a part time job doing something they most likely don't know, and most certainly don't care about, rather than being able to dedicate themselves to finding a job where they'll actually be a productive human being again. Be treated as human I mean, rather than rather literal wage slavery.

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Distind

                    I have a question, how is someone who is effectively drafted by the government supposed to find a job working at least 33 hours a week? At best you'd have people who never showed up because they were attempting to find a job. Assuming they're actually doing what unemployment benefits are supposed to let you do. You want a group of people who are supposed to be looking for work, forced to hold a part time job doing something they most likely don't know, and most certainly don't care about, rather than being able to dedicate themselves to finding a job where they'll actually be a productive human being again. Be treated as human I mean, rather than rather literal wage slavery.

                    W Offline
                    W Offline
                    wolfbinary
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    All they should have to do is tell their boss they've got an interview. If you can look for a job while having a job when you're already employed I don't see the difficulty. The only difference is that you'd be productive the rest of the time rather than sitting on the couch for the majority of your time not looking or interviewing. Its more of a "to fill the time." Volunteering would also be a good alternative. I'm sure something like the soup kitchens or something like that could use the help. When I was out of work I looked into it to pass the time. I have a hard time standing still. Luckily I had plenty to do around the house. I have an old house that needs some improvements. Wage slave, that's Chomsky I believe. Don't you find more dignity in working for a wage rather than being handed one for nothing? I hated it.

                    That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups