Wow you guys fail.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Would it even work? I have my doubts.
Yeah it will, but you have to be persistent. I've done it before when I would get "permanently" banned from this site, I'd come right back and continue. When my posts would get deleted, I would repost them. Eventually they gave up and accepted the fact that they can't get rid of me.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Really, what part was so bad that it had to be deleted?
That you don't know, only reveals your ignorance. However you have already claimed ignorance, see here[^], as one of your redeeming qualities so I'm not surprised.
harold aptroot wrote:
I've seen worse things around here.
That's using your subjective judgement which thankfully few people share.
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
Without knowing the words used (but I can probably guess) I think Harold has a point. I have seen some pretty bad stuff in this forum in the past that gets responded to but never removed despite the fact that it is often libellous, obscene, or in some cases downright racist. The warning at the top of this forum makes it clear: if you can't stand the heat, stay out.
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
-
Without knowing the words used (but I can probably guess) I think Harold has a point. I have seen some pretty bad stuff in this forum in the past that gets responded to but never removed despite the fact that it is often libellous, obscene, or in some cases downright racist. The warning at the top of this forum makes it clear: if you can't stand the heat, stay out.
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
For sure the warning is clear. This is also not the first time something has been deleted, either. Regardless of our opinions on the matter, Chris still has the final say[^]. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
-
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
What did you say?
Your mum told you if you kept doing it you'd go deaf.
I thought it was that you would go blind???
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
I thought it was that you would go blind???
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Would it even work? I have my doubts.
So you want to be a troll too? Isn't one enough? If Chris was so inclined he could sue CSS for breach of terms and conditions after banning him. No one has any right to use this site. There are ways of making CSS banned, but I'm sure Chris has more than enough to do about the site then deal with the crap of one person. Most people here respect Chris's wishes.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Would it even work? I have my doubts.
Yeah it will, but you have to be persistent. I've done it before when I would get "permanently" banned from this site, I'd come right back and continue. When my posts would get deleted, I would repost them. Eventually they gave up and accepted the fact that they can't get rid of me.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Like some of the nastier venereal diseases, you just keep coming back. Talking of VD, how is your mother doing? has she recovered from the last bout you gave her?
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]
-
Really, what part was so bad that it had to be deleted? I've seen worse things around here.
Which forum was it deleted from? And by the way, the same is seen in the UK on kids TV; Ethnic minorities constitute 70% or so of the children used.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
Which forum was it deleted from? And by the way, the same is seen in the UK on kids TV; Ethnic minorities constitute 70% or so of the children used.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
Which forum was it deleted from? And by the way, the same is seen in the UK on kids TV; Ethnic minorities constitute 70% or so of the children used.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
In the US more than the half of the kid’s shows are targeting the Hispanic population. Dorothy Exp., Diego etc. etc. Probably the simple reason behind this is to propagate the English language; not some hypocrite political correctness.
There is only one Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
-
In the US more than the half of the kid’s shows are targeting the Hispanic population. Dorothy Exp., Diego etc. etc. Probably the simple reason behind this is to propagate the English language; not some hypocrite political correctness.
There is only one Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
In the UK they all speak English, heck, they even speak Engl;ish in their own country, so this isnt applicable. No, what is is political correctness. It is the desire of, particularly the BBC, to show what a hapy multicultural country we are by having representetives of each race on kids TV. So, you will find a Chineese, an Arab, a Pakistani, a Negro, and a blonde haired scandanavian looking kid (why supposedly Englifh kids should all resemble members ofc th eHitler Youth is beyond me, after all, many English are quite dardk skinned and brown eyed). Anyway, so out of 6 kids you have 1 ethnic english kid. THis is ofcourse totally unrepresentetive of the true constitution of the UK.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
-
It must have been the way you worded it. I am sure the owners of this site dont want to see storm front style posts here. If you want to make a valid point, choose your wording ro you will end up with the same respect as CSS.
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct from natural variation." Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville