How to load 100,000 list view items without application freeze?
-
Change your design and use VirtualMode[^] to allow fast drawing of the
ListViewirrespective of where in the view you are positioned.I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
ok, I may try that in the end
Чесноков
-
Hi, here are some ideas for you: 1. having thousands of items in any Control does not make for a good user interface. 2. list oriented Controls will relayout and/or repaint themselves after every addition. it is wise to use AddRange rather than Add, and sometimes surround the entire operation with SuspendLayout/ResumeLayout. 3. if obtaining the items takes a while, it often helps to build a collection of items to be added to a list Control in a generic list, then add the list's content to the Control. The former can be performed on any thread, the latter obviously needs to be executed by the main thread. 4. some Controls have a "virtual mode" where one only needs to provide items when they become visible. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
modified on Monday, January 31, 2011 10:26 AM
1. log events with time column are easy to scroll 2. I tried to hide listview during items addition and then show it again, that increased performance, I will try yours methods 3. no, it does not, objects are already in the generic list with public methods e.g. time, message, keyword etc... the list view is in details view with columns to each field 4. that is not agreeble compared to 2.
Чесноков
-
Hi, here are some ideas for you: 1. having thousands of items in any Control does not make for a good user interface. 2. list oriented Controls will relayout and/or repaint themselves after every addition. it is wise to use AddRange rather than Add, and sometimes surround the entire operation with SuspendLayout/ResumeLayout. 3. if obtaining the items takes a while, it often helps to build a collection of items to be added to a list Control in a generic list, then add the list's content to the Control. The former can be performed on any thread, the latter obviously needs to be executed by the main thread. 4. some Controls have a "virtual mode" where one only needs to provide items when they become visible. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
modified on Monday, January 31, 2011 10:26 AM
Luc Pattyn wrote:
. it is wise to use AddRange rather than Add, and
It will need to create a list of ListViewItems. Will it be faster than reporting from background worker item by item?
Чесноков
-
Hi, here are some ideas for you: 1. having thousands of items in any Control does not make for a good user interface. 2. list oriented Controls will relayout and/or repaint themselves after every addition. it is wise to use AddRange rather than Add, and sometimes surround the entire operation with SuspendLayout/ResumeLayout. 3. if obtaining the items takes a while, it often helps to build a collection of items to be added to a list Control in a generic list, then add the list's content to the Control. The former can be performed on any thread, the latter obviously needs to be executed by the main thread. 4. some Controls have a "virtual mode" where one only needs to provide items when they become visible. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
modified on Monday, January 31, 2011 10:26 AM
Luc Pattyn wrote:
sometimes surround the entire operation with SuspendLayout/ResumeLayout
that is significantly slower than hiding the control
Чесноков
-
1. log events with time column are easy to scroll 2. I tried to hide listview during items addition and then show it again, that increased performance, I will try yours methods 3. no, it does not, objects are already in the generic list with public methods e.g. time, message, keyword etc... the list view is in details view with columns to each field 4. that is not agreeble compared to 2.
Чесноков
For logging I recommend a ListBox, it will easily handle thousands of lines per second. See here[^]. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
-
For logging I recommend a ListBox, it will easily handle thousands of lines per second. See here[^]. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
I need to display log events which are already collected in a generic list. There are thousands of them, I'd like to explore the limits. ListBox does not contain columns to show specific fields :(
Чесноков
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
How do you find what you want in a list of 100,000 items
There is scroll bar, I can scroll them all easily :) and find event I'm looking for. Filtering is another extension to consider, the problem is to load them all at once. Why Microsoft can do that and we can't? Was it the serious desing flaw in windows event viewer or not we may further argue.
OriginalGriff wrote:
Does Google load all 10,000 hits into a single page
Perhaps there might be other reasons we may ask google. I presume it may hang IE, firefox or any other browser and induce them to consume all the free mem. If it hangs IE to load some of the pages with java which fits into a single window, consider what would happen with a page consisted of 10000 links.
Чесноков
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
There is scroll bar, I can scroll them all easily
Try scrolling 100k items on my machine, locating the entry with the name "Bla400x". You could finish an entire bottle of Jacks' before you even reached the entries that start with a "B".
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
Why Microsoft can do that and we can't?
You're referring to the Spy-program, where a
ListBoxis used for logging. Microsoft is using the same technique in it's Sql Profiler. The difference is that it's merely adding a few items every second, and the user will rarely scroll through all the items to locate a particular entry. Now, adding text to a collection that's displayed in a control doesn't take much time. Loading a lot of records from your database and adding them to your list will take a lot of time, especially if Windows keeps repainting after each fresh insert.Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
Perhaps there might be other reasons we may ask google. I presume it may hang IE, firefox or any other browser and induce them to consume all the free mem.
That's far-fetched, your computer won't run out of memory if Google replies with more than 50 results. It would be rediculous to assume that you're going to read over 500 results, so they send you what you're probably going to use. How often did you navigate to the second result-page?
I are Troll :suss:
-
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
You have a serious design flaw in your app if you think you need to show 100,000 items in a single control.
Have you ever ran Windows Events on your machine? How many events are there in a list view for a couple of years e.g. windows applications :) It does not freeze as you run it either.
Чесноков
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
Windows Events
Huh? If you're referring to Event Viewer, then yes, I have. And to counter, have you ever looked at ALL of those events, or just the last 100 or so?? Notice how long it takes to populate that list of 1,000 events?? I rest my case. I know it doesn't freeze. That's because it's adding all those events from a background thread, and not all at one time.
A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave Kreskowiak -
It is possible to run addition of items in background worker but it needs to add them in report progress handler, main thread only, which also hangs the application. Is there any other approaches to add them to list view without application freeze?
Чесноков
Thats Easy. just use the listview in virtual mode m8 ;) I have some listviews with over a million entries, and my app dont freeze at all. ;) Just remember to use cached items that also ups the preformance ;) Heres the guideline from MSDN http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.listview.virtualmode.aspx[^] Happy codeing
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\
-
Thats Easy. just use the listview in virtual mode m8 ;) I have some listviews with over a million entries, and my app dont freeze at all. ;) Just remember to use cached items that also ups the preformance ;) Heres the guideline from MSDN http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.listview.virtualmode.aspx[^] Happy codeing
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\
-
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
There is scroll bar, I can scroll them all easily
Try scrolling 100k items on my machine, locating the entry with the name "Bla400x". You could finish an entire bottle of Jacks' before you even reached the entries that start with a "B".
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
Why Microsoft can do that and we can't?
You're referring to the Spy-program, where a
ListBoxis used for logging. Microsoft is using the same technique in it's Sql Profiler. The difference is that it's merely adding a few items every second, and the user will rarely scroll through all the items to locate a particular entry. Now, adding text to a collection that's displayed in a control doesn't take much time. Loading a lot of records from your database and adding them to your list will take a lot of time, especially if Windows keeps repainting after each fresh insert.Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
Perhaps there might be other reasons we may ask google. I presume it may hang IE, firefox or any other browser and induce them to consume all the free mem.
That's far-fetched, your computer won't run out of memory if Google replies with more than 50 results. It would be rediculous to assume that you're going to read over 500 results, so they send you what you're probably going to use. How often did you navigate to the second result-page?
I are Troll :suss:
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
ry scrolling 100k items on my machine, locating the entry with the name "Bla400x". You could finish an entire bottle of Jacks' before you even reached the entries that start with a "B".
:-D honestly, you have to scroll to specific time, and event icons are pretty distinct, and it is very easy to quickly locate minority of error lines with red icons among majority of bluish info events. while scrolling time column is pretty visible as you scroll it. I'm off alcohol :laugh: that enables me to scroll in less than second entire list
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
The difference is that it's merely adding a few items every second, and the user will rarely scroll through all the items to locate a particular entry.
I've just rechecked in Event Viewer events logs, scroll bar is so small that entire list is filled. You can scroll to any place. I do not know it might be some undocumented feature or they are using virtual view.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
rediculous to assume that you're going to read over 500 results,
I do so always, rather than clicking 50 times to forward to next item, I prefer scroll bar move.
Чесноков
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
ry scrolling 100k items on my machine, locating the entry with the name "Bla400x". You could finish an entire bottle of Jacks' before you even reached the entries that start with a "B".
:-D honestly, you have to scroll to specific time, and event icons are pretty distinct, and it is very easy to quickly locate minority of error lines with red icons among majority of bluish info events. while scrolling time column is pretty visible as you scroll it. I'm off alcohol :laugh: that enables me to scroll in less than second entire list
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
The difference is that it's merely adding a few items every second, and the user will rarely scroll through all the items to locate a particular entry.
I've just rechecked in Event Viewer events logs, scroll bar is so small that entire list is filled. You can scroll to any place. I do not know it might be some undocumented feature or they are using virtual view.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
rediculous to assume that you're going to read over 500 results,
I do so always, rather than clicking 50 times to forward to next item, I prefer scroll bar move.
Чесноков
Why not show your design to some users and see what they think of having to scroll through that many items? Get their feedback before you commit to it.
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
Windows Events
Huh? If you're referring to Event Viewer, then yes, I have. And to counter, have you ever looked at ALL of those events, or just the last 100 or so?? Notice how long it takes to populate that list of 1,000 events?? I rest my case. I know it doesn't freeze. That's because it's adding all those events from a background thread, and not all at one time.
A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave KreskowiakDave Kreskowiak wrote:
That's because it's adding all those events from a background thread
Yes, Event Viewer, but scroll bar is height is pretty small. There is impression it is naturally populated. It might be in virtual view or manually driven.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
That's because it's adding all those events from a background thread
I do so also. Once you scroll to a middle it displays events in the middle. It'd be rather complicated to simulate the scroll and show only specific items from the middle.
Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
have you ever looked at ALL of those
I did once without problems in PC store when bought a laptop. I had to quickly browse them all to make sure computer was without glitches. I do not have any problems. It is easy just to scroll with a mouse to any particular day and then fine scroll with pgup, pgdwn further :)
Чесноков
-
Thats Easy. just use the listview in virtual mode m8 ;) I have some listviews with over a million entries, and my app dont freeze at all. ;) Just remember to use cached items that also ups the preformance ;) Heres the guideline from MSDN http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.listview.virtualmode.aspx[^] Happy codeing
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\
you've the right answer while others complaining they can not handle 1000 lines without a bottle of Jack's :laugh: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3753678/Re-How-to-load-100-000-list-view-items-without-app.aspx[^] millions of entries, I could not ever dream of that :) I hope virtual view is not so hard of coding...
Чесноков
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
ry scrolling 100k items on my machine, locating the entry with the name "Bla400x". You could finish an entire bottle of Jacks' before you even reached the entries that start with a "B".
:-D honestly, you have to scroll to specific time, and event icons are pretty distinct, and it is very easy to quickly locate minority of error lines with red icons among majority of bluish info events. while scrolling time column is pretty visible as you scroll it. I'm off alcohol :laugh: that enables me to scroll in less than second entire list
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
The difference is that it's merely adding a few items every second, and the user will rarely scroll through all the items to locate a particular entry.
I've just rechecked in Event Viewer events logs, scroll bar is so small that entire list is filled. You can scroll to any place. I do not know it might be some undocumented feature or they are using virtual view.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
rediculous to assume that you're going to read over 500 results,
I do so always, rather than clicking 50 times to forward to next item, I prefer scroll bar move.
Чесноков
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
and event icons are pretty distinct
Not if they scroll by at Mach 2.1 :laugh:
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
and it is very easy to quickly locate minority of error lines with red icons among majority of bluish info events
I have a checkbox for that - a single click and all you see are ListView items with a red cross :)
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
while scrolling time column is pretty visible as you scroll it. I'm off alcohol Laugh that enables me to scroll in less than second entire list
I don't mind scrolling through the event-log, or the log of the profiler, since I'm expecting a list. I wouldn't recommend the same pattern for database-records representing business-objects. But my apologies, you're right, there are circumstances where it might be appropriate :)
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
I've just rechecked in Event Viewer events logs, scroll bar is so small that entire list is filled. You can scroll to any place. I do not know it might be some undocumented feature or they are using virtual view.
It's probably not in .NET. Anyway, there should be a virtual-listview example somewhere on MSDN, give it a try.
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote:
I do so always, rather than clicking 50 times to forward to next item, I prefer scroll bar move.
I prefer hitting
PgDwn, since it takes effort to move my hand from the keyboard and move it to the mouse. Having "pages" to browse through seems to work for a lot of people, especially if there's a nice index at the bottom. Other people prefer a autocomplete-textbox, or indeed, the scrollbar. Do the Microsoft-thing, and implement 'em all! :cool:I are Troll :suss:
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
ry scrolling 100k items on my machine, locating the entry with the name "Bla400x". You could finish an entire bottle of Jacks' before you even reached the entries that start with a "B".
:-D honestly, you have to scroll to specific time, and event icons are pretty distinct, and it is very easy to quickly locate minority of error lines with red icons among majority of bluish info events. while scrolling time column is pretty visible as you scroll it. I'm off alcohol :laugh: that enables me to scroll in less than second entire list
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
The difference is that it's merely adding a few items every second, and the user will rarely scroll through all the items to locate a particular entry.
I've just rechecked in Event Viewer events logs, scroll bar is so small that entire list is filled. You can scroll to any place. I do not know it might be some undocumented feature or they are using virtual view.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
rediculous to assume that you're going to read over 500 results,
I do so always, rather than clicking 50 times to forward to next item, I prefer scroll bar move.
Чесноков
You have been given the same advice from several people now. Why are you continuing to argue the point? If you don't want to use the advice then don't ask for it.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
-
you've the right answer while others complaining they can not handle 1000 lines without a bottle of Jack's :laugh: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3753678/Re-How-to-load-100-000-list-view-items-without-app.aspx[^] millions of entries, I could not ever dream of that :) I hope virtual view is not so hard of coding...
Чесноков
Virtual mode is very easy to use and code... just look at the guidline i gave you from microsoft, it shows you the way. But u need to know that virtual mode has its limits, with what it can do, compared to normal mode. ;)
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\
-
Didnt see m8, sry ;)
With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\
-
you've the right answer while others complaining they can not handle 1000 lines without a bottle of Jack's :laugh: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3753678/Re-How-to-load-100-000-list-view-items-without-app.aspx[^] millions of entries, I could not ever dream of that :) I hope virtual view is not so hard of coding...
Чесноков
No you missed the point. No one was telling you they couldn't handle it, or that the controls could not support it. They have been telling you it is not a good design. And using the argument that Microsoft does it is not valid. The Event Viewer and such controls are written specifically for high performance situation in C++. You are not doing that are you?
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
-
No you missed the point. No one was telling you they couldn't handle it, or that the controls could not support it. They have been telling you it is not a good design. And using the argument that Microsoft does it is not valid. The Event Viewer and such controls are written specifically for high performance situation in C++. You are not doing that are you?
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
this entire thread got way too much attention...
do or do not, there is no try