Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Unproven science

Unproven science

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
37 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Losinger

    "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


    Please stand by

    ThumbNailer

    N Offline
    N Offline
    Nish Nishant
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    But you must realize that it's because of that 17.5B that the US is the world's most powerful country and why it can dictate terms and overall this helps to improve it's economy. Correct me if I am wrong but that's the idea I have about my new country of residence. :-) I am open to learnbing new stuff about the US now that I am here :-) Nish


    Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]

    J P S 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Losinger

      "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


      Please stand by

      ThumbNailer

      K Offline
      K Offline
      Kant
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Chris Losinger wrote: $17.5 billion Imagine how much money laundering done by the Defense contractors to get a piece of 17.5 billion. :eek: Kant Sonork-100.28114 Don't :beer: and Drive.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Losinger

        "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


        Please stand by

        ThumbNailer

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Marc Clifton
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        and get knowledge about it and experience with it That's the best rationale I've heard from dropping H-bombs on people! We need to get experience with it! :omg: Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
        Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
        Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Losinger

          "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


          Please stand by

          ThumbNailer

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          We (the US) are much more susceptable to more jet hijackings, chemical/biological attacks, small "suitcase" nukes than missle attacks. This is a complete waste of money. :( Mike Mullikin :beer:

          The goal of any programmer is to build something that will last at least until he's finished building it. - - Anonymous

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Losinger

            "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


            Please stand by

            ThumbNailer

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Christian Graus
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Star Wars. Christian No offense, but I don't really want to encourage the creation of another VB developer. - Larry Antram 22 Oct 2002
            C# will attract all comers, where VB is for IT Journalists and managers - Michael P Butler 05-12-2002
            Again, you can screw up a C/C++ program just as easily as a VB program. OK, maybe not as easily, but it's certainly doable. - Jamie Nordmeyer - 15-Nov-2002

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              We (the US) are much more susceptable to more jet hijackings, chemical/biological attacks, small "suitcase" nukes than missle attacks. This is a complete waste of money. :( Mike Mullikin :beer:

              The goal of any programmer is to build something that will last at least until he's finished building it. - - Anonymous

              K Offline
              K Offline
              KaRl
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              And it's still proven that a Maginot Line isn't enough to be safe :(


              One small village of indomitable geeks still holds out against the invaders. And life is not easy for the managers legionaries who garrison the fortified camps of Microsoftum, Javum, Ceplumplum and Vebasum

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Losinger

                "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


                Please stand by

                ThumbNailer

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Austin
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Chris Losinger wrote: Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? How about the whole of scienctific knowledge. Every field of science started out as just an idea or science fiction. Having been forced to History of Science courses in collage, I can say It seems every siginificat inovation or derived application was seen as voodoo by some. It is just the course of scientific development. To be fair most experiments fail. But what is important, is the experminatl lesson learned. Without expermintation we'd still be chucking stones. Chris Losinger wrote: Was $17.5B spent on it? Have no idea. Does anybody know how much the space program has cost over the years in todays money? I've got to look that up now :) Later Fill me with your knowledge, your wisdom, your coffee.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Nish Nishant

                  But you must realize that it's because of that 17.5B that the US is the world's most powerful country and why it can dictate terms and overall this helps to improve it's economy. Correct me if I am wrong but that's the idea I have about my new country of residence. :-) I am open to learnbing new stuff about the US now that I am here :-) Nish


                  Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jeremy Falcon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Nishant S wrote: I am open to learnbing new stuff about the US now that I am here Wow! :omg: Where have I been? Well, welcome aboard! So, which part of the states are you staying in? I mean, did you opt for the hillbilly, redneck, or yankee route? :) Jeremy Falcon Imputek Excrement escapes everyone - even elders.

                  N R 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jeremy Falcon

                    Nishant S wrote: I am open to learnbing new stuff about the US now that I am here Wow! :omg: Where have I been? Well, welcome aboard! So, which part of the states are you staying in? I mean, did you opt for the hillbilly, redneck, or yankee route? :) Jeremy Falcon Imputek Excrement escapes everyone - even elders.

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Nish Nishant
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Jeremy Falcon wrote: So, which part of the states are you staying in? Mountain View, California Nish


                    Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Austin

                      Chris Losinger wrote: Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? How about the whole of scienctific knowledge. Every field of science started out as just an idea or science fiction. Having been forced to History of Science courses in collage, I can say It seems every siginificat inovation or derived application was seen as voodoo by some. It is just the course of scientific development. To be fair most experiments fail. But what is important, is the experminatl lesson learned. Without expermintation we'd still be chucking stones. Chris Losinger wrote: Was $17.5B spent on it? Have no idea. Does anybody know how much the space program has cost over the years in todays money? I've got to look that up now :) Later Fill me with your knowledge, your wisdom, your coffee.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Chris Losinger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Chris Austin wrote: How about the whole of scienctific knowledge yeah. i was thinking of something a little more recent (and maybe named for a japanese city). :) -c


                      Please stand by

                      ThumbNailer

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Nish Nishant

                        But you must realize that it's because of that 17.5B that the US is the world's most powerful country and why it can dictate terms and overall this helps to improve it's economy. Correct me if I am wrong but that's the idea I have about my new country of residence. :-) I am open to learnbing new stuff about the US now that I am here :-) Nish


                        Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        peterchen
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Nishant S wrote: and overall this helps to improve it's economy Common mistake: It's the same as saying "kicking foosballs through windows is good for the economy because it creates jobs for window-makers" $17.5B in missile defense is economically better than $17.5B in a treasure chest in the white house. But $17.5B invested in an low-interest program for people that want to start their own business would be 42x more effective. $17.5B in missile defense is nothing more than welfare program for some politics and steel tycoons. [sarcasm]Happily, the german economy will benefit, too - no doubt.[/sarcasm] Nishant S wrote: and why it can dictate terms Oh, I'm afraid we will have clashes about this attitude Nish... :((


                        If I could find a souvenir / just to prove the world was here   [sighist]

                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P peterchen

                          Nishant S wrote: and overall this helps to improve it's economy Common mistake: It's the same as saying "kicking foosballs through windows is good for the economy because it creates jobs for window-makers" $17.5B in missile defense is economically better than $17.5B in a treasure chest in the white house. But $17.5B invested in an low-interest program for people that want to start their own business would be 42x more effective. $17.5B in missile defense is nothing more than welfare program for some politics and steel tycoons. [sarcasm]Happily, the german economy will benefit, too - no doubt.[/sarcasm] Nishant S wrote: and why it can dictate terms Oh, I'm afraid we will have clashes about this attitude Nish... :((


                          If I could find a souvenir / just to prove the world was here   [sighist]

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Nish Nishant
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          peterchen wrote: Oh, I'm afraid we will have clashes about this attitude Nish... Oh! Well I am neither for not against it. In fact, I really am not very thorough about such stuff and have only a vague idea of world politics. But I am trying to learn more stuff :-) Nish


                          Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Chris Losinger

                            "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


                            Please stand by

                            ThumbNailer

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Roger Wright
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            The "New Deal," and the "War on Poverty" come to mind... But seriously, it's ridiculous to commit this level of funding for what is essentially a proof-of-concept technology. We've had some important successes in this field - the HOES project for one - but the technology isn't yet there. A limited development would be far more appropriate, with a much smaller price tag. "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jeremy Falcon

                              Nishant S wrote: I am open to learnbing new stuff about the US now that I am here Wow! :omg: Where have I been? Well, welcome aboard! So, which part of the states are you staying in? I mean, did you opt for the hillbilly, redneck, or yankee route? :) Jeremy Falcon Imputek Excrement escapes everyone - even elders.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Roger Wright
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Jeremy Falcon wrote: did you opt for the hillbilly, redneck, or yankee route? He picked the land of fruits and nuts.:-D "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Nish Nishant

                                But you must realize that it's because of that 17.5B that the US is the world's most powerful country and why it can dictate terms and overall this helps to improve it's economy. Correct me if I am wrong but that's the idea I have about my new country of residence. :-) I am open to learnbing new stuff about the US now that I am here :-) Nish


                                Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                I think you will ultimately become a true American, Nish. But you still suffer from a misunderstanding of capitalism. Our economy is not powerful because we "dictate terms" to anyone. It is the other way around. We can dictate terms because we have a powerful economy. Our economy is powerful because it remains largely (although sadly decreasingly) commited to the principles of free market enterprise. The military is a drain on our economy. If you build a truck to transport produce, that truck generates revenue for the economy by improving the efficiency with which produce is transported, hence the truck improves the economy. On the other hand, an Army Tank produces no net gain for the economy at all. The military is a cost made necessary for the simple reason that the free market system has so many enemies and our system would be destroyed without the military. BTW, welcome to the U.S. (although many of us no longer consider California to actually be part of the U.S.) "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                N 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stan Shannon

                                  I think you will ultimately become a true American, Nish. But you still suffer from a misunderstanding of capitalism. Our economy is not powerful because we "dictate terms" to anyone. It is the other way around. We can dictate terms because we have a powerful economy. Our economy is powerful because it remains largely (although sadly decreasingly) commited to the principles of free market enterprise. The military is a drain on our economy. If you build a truck to transport produce, that truck generates revenue for the economy by improving the efficiency with which produce is transported, hence the truck improves the economy. On the other hand, an Army Tank produces no net gain for the economy at all. The military is a cost made necessary for the simple reason that the free market system has so many enemies and our system would be destroyed without the military. BTW, welcome to the U.S. (although many of us no longer consider California to actually be part of the U.S.) "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                  N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Nish Nishant
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  Stan Shannon wrote: BTW, welcome to the U.S. Thanks Stan :-) I am still merging in. It's taking me a lot longer to settle in that I had ever expected :-) Nish


                                  Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Chris Losinger

                                    "The reason I think it's important to start is because you have to put something in place and get knowledge about it and experience with it." That's Rumsfeld's rationalization as to why the US should spend over $17.5 billion dollars on missile defense. Can anyone think of anything else that was deemed "unproven science"? Was $17.5B spent on it? (not counting trickle-down economics and Reagan's astrologer) -c


                                    Please stand by

                                    ThumbNailer

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stan Shannon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    It is not about science it is about strategic military planning. I'm not strongly in favor of a missle defense system, but considering how much money we waste on social welfare crap, 17.5 billion seems like a modest investment. It would be better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it. Chris Losinger wrote: not counting trickle-down economics trickle-down == capitalism - proven beyond any scientific/economic doubt. Only the Marxists of the world fail to understand that. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                    C 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Stan Shannon

                                      It is not about science it is about strategic military planning. I'm not strongly in favor of a missle defense system, but considering how much money we waste on social welfare crap, 17.5 billion seems like a modest investment. It would be better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it. Chris Losinger wrote: not counting trickle-down economics trickle-down == capitalism - proven beyond any scientific/economic doubt. Only the Marxists of the world fail to understand that. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      Chris Losinger
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      Stan Shannon wrote: waste on social welfare crap yeah. to hell with living in a nice country. let's get to killing!


                                      Please stand by

                                      ThumbNailer

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Chris Losinger

                                        Stan Shannon wrote: waste on social welfare crap yeah. to hell with living in a nice country. let's get to killing!


                                        Please stand by

                                        ThumbNailer

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Stan Shannon
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        Any one that wants to live in a nice country can always move to Canada. But you had better hurry before their economy collapses. In the long run nice is a lot more expensive than mean. The U.S. is mean, always has been, and, I hope, always will be. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Stan Shannon

                                          Any one that wants to live in a nice country can always move to Canada. But you had better hurry before their economy collapses. In the long run nice is a lot more expensive than mean. The U.S. is mean, always has been, and, I hope, always will be. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Chris Losinger
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          Stan Shannon wrote: nice is a lot more expensive than mean prove it -c


                                          Please stand by

                                          ThumbNailer

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups