Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Clever Code
  4. Comment Switching

Comment Switching

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Clever Code
debuggingdiscussion
20 Posts 10 Posters 97 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

    Yes..?

    -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Reiss
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    You have pointed the user at the #if preprocessor (getting my 5), so I thought it might be useful to show the full listing - especially the #define and #undefine preprocessors as theses are commonly used with the #if

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M musefan

      I have a static string which I am constantly switch to a known value for debugging. But now I have come up with something that saves me 3 key strokes!!! consider...

      public static string MyString = "";//@"DEBUG VALUE";

      ...I was constantly deleting

      "";//

      and re-adding for each toggle. Now I have changed to this...

      public static string MyString = "";//*/@"DEBUG VALUE";

      ...now I just need to add/remove

      /*

      each time to toggle the value...

      public static string MyString = /*"";//*/@"DEBUG VALUE";

      result! :laugh: ...and I don't want to hear about your #DEBUG comments

      My opinions are right, and yours are wrong! (or at least that is my opinion)

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RobCroll
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      It would be even cleverer if you used string.Empty instead of "". :)

      "You get that on the big jobs."

      M G 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R RobCroll

        It would be even cleverer if you used string.Empty instead of "". :)

        "You get that on the big jobs."

        M Offline
        M Offline
        musefan
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        way too much typing

        My opinions are right, and yours are wrong! (or at least that is my opinion)

        B F P 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M musefan

          I have a static string which I am constantly switch to a known value for debugging. But now I have come up with something that saves me 3 key strokes!!! consider...

          public static string MyString = "";//@"DEBUG VALUE";

          ...I was constantly deleting

          "";//

          and re-adding for each toggle. Now I have changed to this...

          public static string MyString = "";//*/@"DEBUG VALUE";

          ...now I just need to add/remove

          /*

          each time to toggle the value...

          public static string MyString = /*"";//*/@"DEBUG VALUE";

          result! :laugh: ...and I don't want to hear about your #DEBUG comments

          My opinions are right, and yours are wrong! (or at least that is my opinion)

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Nah, you debug it with Windbg and set the variable in the module directly, while its running.

          ============================== Nothing to say.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Reiss

            You have pointed the user at the #if preprocessor (getting my 5), so I thought it might be useful to show the full listing - especially the #define and #undefine preprocessors as theses are commonly used with the #if

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jorgen Sigvardsson
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Oh, ok!

            -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M musefan

              way too much typing

              My opinions are right, and yours are wrong! (or at least that is my opinion)

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Brady Kelly
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Are you using notepad to write code? OK, two key-presses vs. four is a win, but certainly not a lot of typing.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M musefan

                way too much typing

                My opinions are right, and yours are wrong! (or at least that is my opinion)

                F Offline
                F Offline
                fjdiewornncalwe
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                The proper way is the right way. With intellisense and all the other editor enhancements that make life easier for developers, the "too much typing" excuse doesn't hold water. If you have issues typing, then you need to brush up on that because writing code incorrectly at the outset is just going to make a sustainment developer's job much more difficult.

                I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R RobCroll

                  It would be even cleverer if you used string.Empty instead of "". :)

                  "You get that on the big jobs."

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gumi_r msn com
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Actually that wouldn't compile I think.

                  string.Empty

                  is readonly so you can't initialize a static variable with it as it could theoretically change during runtime.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G gumi_r msn com

                    Actually that wouldn't compile I think.

                    string.Empty

                    is readonly so you can't initialize a static variable with it as it could theoretically change during runtime.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    RobCroll
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    You had me worried there for a second. I've done find replace on "" on large projects (millions of lines) and never had any adverse affects, let alone a compile error. public static string MyString = string.Empty; compiles for me.

                    "You get that on the big jobs."

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R RobCroll

                      You had me worried there for a second. I've done find replace on "" on large projects (millions of lines) and never had any adverse affects, let alone a compile error. public static string MyString = string.Empty; compiles for me.

                      "You get that on the big jobs."

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gumi_r msn com
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Lol sorry, I actually misread and thought it was

                      public const string MyString = string.Empty

                      Sorry about that.

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G gumi_r msn com

                        Lol sorry, I actually misread and thought it was

                        public const string MyString = string.Empty

                        Sorry about that.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        RobCroll
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Obscure but still worth noting. I guess at the end of the day who would set a const to equal ""?

                        "You get that on the big jobs."

                        L F 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • R RobCroll

                          Obscure but still worth noting. I guess at the end of the day who would set a const to equal ""?

                          "You get that on the big jobs."

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          Actually its a constant equal to string.Empty... which ahh is already what you should be using. Kinda like when you see

                          const bool TRUE = true;

                          Note: I have never actually seen this except in code horrors responding jokes.

                          Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M musefan

                            way too much typing

                            My opinions are right, and yours are wrong! (or at least that is my opinion)

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            puromtec1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            String.Empty runs faster.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R RobCroll

                              Obscure but still worth noting. I guess at the end of the day who would set a const to equal ""?

                              "You get that on the big jobs."

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fjdiewornncalwe
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              RobCroll wrote:

                              I guess at the end of the day who would set a const to equal ""?

                              Have you been in the Q&A recently? :)

                              I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                                How about

                                public static string MyString =
                                #if USE_MY_SPECIAL_DEBUG_VALUE
                                @"DEBUG VALUE"
                                #else
                                ""
                                #endif
                                ;

                                Surely, this must be a lot more maintainable than a very cryptic looking comment that's going to make your successors wonder WTF?

                                -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

                                K Offline
                                K Offline
                                Ken Booth
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                I agree - not only more readable, but the line

                                #define USE_MY_SPECIAL_DEBUG_VALUE

                                can be commented or uncommented with one mouse click - no keystrokes required!

                                -- Regards, Ken I AM

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups