Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Database & SysAdmin
  3. Database
  4. Regarding performance tunnig

Regarding performance tunnig

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Database
performance
5 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kankeyan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    WHich is more faster to compare values <> or != for performance tunning thanks in advance

    M W 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K kankeyan

      WHich is more faster to compare values <> or != for performance tunning thanks in advance

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mehdi Gholam
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      It makes no difference, both are the same.

      Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager If at first you don't succeed... get a better publicist If the final destination is death, then we should enjoy every second of the journey.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K kankeyan

        WHich is more faster to compare values <> or != for performance tunning thanks in advance

        W Offline
        W Offline
        Wendelius
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        As said, from performance point of view, they are the same. However, since you didn't mention what database you're using, from syntax point of view there may be differences since not all of the databases understand both syntaxes.

        The need to optimize rises from a bad design.My articles[^]

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W Wendelius

          As said, from performance point of view, they are the same. However, since you didn't mention what database you're using, from syntax point of view there may be differences since not all of the databases understand both syntaxes.

          The need to optimize rises from a bad design.My articles[^]

          K Offline
          K Offline
          kankeyan
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          we are using sql server 2008

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kankeyan

            we are using sql server 2008

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pradeep Shukla 0
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            SQL Server understands both the operators...no issue at all

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups