Putting the Soapbox back to it's use
-
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
-
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
-
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
-
peterchen wrote: Who Gassed The Curds? Me. It's a digestive problem. It's not funny. :(
---
Shog9 The siren sings a lonely song - of all the wants and hungers The lust of love a brute desire - the ledge of life goes under
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could have thought of them - George Orwell
-
peterchen wrote: Who Gassed The Curds? Me. It's a digestive problem. It's not funny. :(
---
Shog9 The siren sings a lonely song - of all the wants and hungers The lust of love a brute desire - the ledge of life goes under
Nice One :-) Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.
-
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
everybody's used to explosives, bullets and WWI-era gases. people are only outraged at the new weapons - as if the old ones have stopped working. a man could walk into a crowded subway and kill as many people with a pair of Mac-10's as he could with a can of sarin. and dead is dead. -c
I'm not the droid you're looking for.
-
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
It depends on whether you prefer instant gratification, or would rather savor the lingering effects of your particular weapon. As Chris pointed out, a pair of Mac-10s is every bit as effective as a can of sarin gas, but it really appeals more to the instant gratification crowd. The sarin lets you bask in the glory of your victory over unarmed, defenseless opponents for a longer time... Personally, I prefer weapons that are more easily trained on my intended targets, as opposed to those which attack indiscriminately anyone who happens to wander into the kill zone. Collateral damage can make for some really bad press, and we all want to look our best for the CNN cameras. "How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
-
everybody's used to explosives, bullets and WWI-era gases. people are only outraged at the new weapons - as if the old ones have stopped working. a man could walk into a crowded subway and kill as many people with a pair of Mac-10's as he could with a can of sarin. and dead is dead. -c
I'm not the droid you're looking for.
Chris Losinger wrote: a man could walk into a crowded subway and kill as many people with a pair of Mac-10's as he could with a can of sarin. and dead is dead. Probably easier to sneak in a canister of Sarin gas than a pair of MAC 10s though.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa -
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
peterchen wrote: Who Gassed The Kurds[^]? Well it was the Brits who did it first in the aftermath of the 1917 invasion of Iraq. Michael You gotta roll with it You gotta take your time You gotta say what you say Don't let anybody get in your way - Oasis
-
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
VB users aren't that bad :laugh: :laugh: The tigress is here :-D
-
Noticed too, that idle talk lately took over the soapbox, and the "war on war on terrorism" fairly regulary takes place in the lounge? Restricting rants to ranting zones obviously doesn't work. So, just a thought: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? oh, and Who Gassed The Kurds[^]?
Those who not hear the music think the dancers are mad. [sighist] [Agile]
peterchen wrote: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Yes. What is so special about cluster munitions? They were primarily put into the arsenal as a substitute for napalm - just as effective but safer for the pilot, plus they can be fired from artillery when needed. I would rather get hit by a cluster bomb than either napalm or cyanide. peterchen wrote: Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Yes. Which would you rather die from? The delivery of a thermobaric bomb requires sophisticated aircraft, antrax does not, you can deliver it by mail. peterchen wrote: Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? Yes. Depleted uranium is needed only to punch through modern armor. That is its only use. It is designed exclusively to destroy tanks, not people. If there just happens to be people inside the tank, thats their problem. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle
-
Nices choices :) "You will be put to death. What do you prefer, being burning at the stake or being quartered?"
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
-
But first... Boola boola! ------- signature starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- signature ends
-
Nices choices :) "You will be put to death. What do you prefer, being burning at the stake or being quartered?"
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
To quote the Stooges...A warm stake is better than a cold chop ;P Gary Kirkham A working Program is one that has only unobserved bugs I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted paychecks
-
Chris Losinger wrote: a man could walk into a crowded subway and kill as many people with a pair of Mac-10's as he could with a can of sarin. and dead is dead. Probably easier to sneak in a canister of Sarin gas than a pair of MAC 10s though.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South AfricaAnd the publicity is better using sarin. In the same way we get news of a minor plane crash when only a couple of people die, but nothing about deaths in car accidents, because they are too common, unless, of course, it is a quiet day for news!
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants. - Isaac Newton 1676
-
Chris Losinger wrote: a man could walk into a crowded subway and kill as many people with a pair of Mac-10's as he could with a can of sarin. and dead is dead. Probably easier to sneak in a canister of Sarin gas than a pair of MAC 10s though.
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africaprobably easier to get a pair of mac10's than a can of sarin, too. it's a novelty thing. people thought the machine gun would be the end of war, since it made killing so absurdly easy. instead, armies developed the technique of not walking towards the other army in a straight line. -c
I'm not the droid you're looking for.
-
peterchen wrote: Is cyanide gas worse than a cluster bomb? Yes. What is so special about cluster munitions? They were primarily put into the arsenal as a substitute for napalm - just as effective but safer for the pilot, plus they can be fired from artillery when needed. I would rather get hit by a cluster bomb than either napalm or cyanide. peterchen wrote: Is a barrel of anthrax worse than a thermobaric bomb? Yes. Which would you rather die from? The delivery of a thermobaric bomb requires sophisticated aircraft, antrax does not, you can deliver it by mail. peterchen wrote: Is mustard gas worse than depleted uranium ammunition? Yes. Depleted uranium is needed only to punch through modern armor. That is its only use. It is designed exclusively to destroy tanks, not people. If there just happens to be people inside the tank, thats their problem. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle
Stan Shannon wrote: plus they can be fired from artillery when needed Cluster bombs are great in Worms Armageddon. Especially if you've acquired a "Double Damage" box. :) -- Only in a world this shitty could you even try to say these were innocent people and keep a straight face.
-
And the publicity is better using sarin. In the same way we get news of a minor plane crash when only a couple of people die, but nothing about deaths in car accidents, because they are too common, unless, of course, it is a quiet day for news!
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants. - Isaac Newton 1676
Good point :-) Regards, Brian Dela :-)
Run naked in the snow until you're sweating like a stuck pig and can't seem to catch your breath. When the flu becomes pneumonia, they can cure that with a shot. - Roger Wright
