What a gem.

[edmurphy99]

Maybe they got paid by the line

[BGArts]

Should be an philosopher, not a programmer. This is pure, unadulterated logic.

[Tomz_KV]

I am wondering if the statement continues to reach 0%. To return a result, the program will have to add a power source somewhere.

TOMZ_KV

[Lilith C]

Could have made a better case for switch/case statements. And if the device needed display "NA" it probably wouldn't have been running anyway.

I'm not a programmer but I play one at the office

[Lilith C]

Julien Villers wrote:

BTW, shouldn't that be 'N/A'?

Not when you have to scrape for every byte you can get.

I'm not a programmer but I play one at the office

[Paulo_JCG]

I like the ToString...

If SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent = 1.00f then ...

is such a PITA

Paulo Gomes Over and Out :D

[James Treworgy]

What a shortcut! A qualified programmer would have accounted for the fact that BatteryLifePercent is floating point, and may not be in increments of 1/100th. What if it's 0.975? Obviously this should have been written as:

If SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent <= 1 And
SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent > 0.99 then Return "99%"
ElseIf SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent <= 0.99 And
SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent > 0.98 then Return "98%"
...

:)

[Jasmine2501]

They are clearly just coding around a bad framework. There's a field called BatteryLifePercent, but it's not actually a percentage number. Obviously the framework is incorrect.

[Sander Rossel]

Option Strict is off or the Property would have an As clause! Correct would've been:

Public ReadOnly Property BatteryPercent As Percent
Get
If SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString = "1" Then
' No implicit conversions with Strict On!
Return Convert.ToPercentage("100%")
' Etc...

Now that just made a world of difference :)

It's an OO world.

public class Naerling : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}

[YSLGuru]

Could be wrong but it looks like a case of lack of knowledge, not knwoing/understanding that there is a better/more effecoent way to achieve teh same goal. I work in RDBMS (sepcifcally SQL Server) and I routinely see this same kind of bad design choice and usually its due to a lack of knowledge/eductaion on the product/system. For example when the develoepr needs to store a bolean value ( 0 and <>0 ) they use a NUMERIC data type which [by default) uses 9 bytes instead of using the smaller BIT data type.

[AspDotNetDev]

This is why degrees are useful. You may not be the best programmer in the world after graduating, but at least you should learn enough to avoid code like this. Having a get-r-done attitude is fine and all, but a get-r-done intelligently attitude is much better.

Somebody in an online forum wrote:

INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.

[weberrich]

Although, I know doesn't look all that good. There may be come consideration to optimization. Does the huge case statement cost less than a few function calls? Just a thought, and like to play devils advocate.

[Jorgen Andersson]

That's horrible. Everyone knows that you should use a varchar and store it as 'True' or 'False'.

Light moves faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak. List of common misconceptions

[firegryphon]

That is a joke right? Does this joke include enough to go all the way to 0%?

[Julien Villers]

You were joking right? I saw graduates that couldn't tell a variable from an array from a class from an object (etc...). Oh, and they weren't like barely getting their grades, in fact, they were top of the class (due to compensating programming with communication or economics, plus getting their projects done by others).

'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Why do you think I've got this outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail

[Mark AJA]

Don't know what language this is, but I'm sure you could use the following to reduce the code length:

' ...
Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString *100) & "%"
' . End of function.

[AspDotNetDev]

Nope, not joking. Not everybody who goes through college is a better programmer than a non-college programmer. Though I'd say more college grads have better sense. Of course, that's from my anecdotal experience*, so YMMV. *For example, I wrote my 558 Lines of QuickBasic Glory before I went to college. Relying on file IO, "unnecessary" optimizations, and third party libraries seemed like too much work at the time.

Somebody in an online forum wrote:

INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.

[smcnulty2000]

There you go, thinking like a programmer again. Where's that going to get ya? :)

_____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

[Julien Villers]

I guess if you take a statistical sample of graduates vs non-graduates, the average is better, and the deviation lower. I was worried that you'd equate degree with competence ;)

'As programmers go, I'm fairly social. Which still means I'm a borderline sociopath by normal standards.' Jeff Atwood 'I'm French! Why do you think I've got this outrrrrageous accent?' Monty Python and the Holy Grail

[Paladin2000]

Actually, it's:

Return (SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent * 100).ToString() + "%"

You did the ToString before the multiplication. Note that this:

SystemInformation.PowerStatus.BatteryLifePercent.ToString("p")

...does create a percentage conversion, but since it has decimals and a space it is not equivalent.