animation in opengl
-
Not a word or construct used in the above post is not used in (free to air) tv commercials, played at any hour of the day in this country. To which are you referring? (I assume it is the aussie version of sod off)
enhzflep wrote:
To which are you referring?
Well you don't need me to spell it out, but I would also refer you to http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3117206/HOW-TO-ANSWER-A-QUESTION.aspx[^].
-
enhzflep wrote:
To which are you referring?
Well you don't need me to spell it out, but I would also refer you to http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3117206/HOW-TO-ANSWER-A-QUESTION.aspx[^].
I really can't be bothered with this rubbish. Am I to take it from you that the following are insults?
- Go away
- Nick off
- Sod off
- Bugger off
I'd agree that some may consider it insulting to be told to go away - I consider it insulting to be forced to vote in a democracy. But neither being told to go away or being required to vote is an insult. You may want to turn down the gain on your sensitivity stage.....
-
I really can't be bothered with this rubbish. Am I to take it from you that the following are insults?
- Go away
- Nick off
- Sod off
- Bugger off
I'd agree that some may consider it insulting to be told to go away - I consider it insulting to be forced to vote in a democracy. But neither being told to go away or being required to vote is an insult. You may want to turn down the gain on your sensitivity stage.....
enhzflep wrote:
You may want to turn down the gain on your sensitivity stage.....
I am not in the least bothered by such expressions. I just agree with Chris that this sort of language is not appropriate in the general forums.
-
enhzflep wrote:
You may want to turn down the gain on your sensitivity stage.....
I am not in the least bothered by such expressions. I just agree with Chris that this sort of language is not appropriate in the general forums.
I won't bother pointing out the fact that you've changed your complaint when challenged. I will point out that
- I provided information that indicated the problem I had with the offending post
- There was no insult in my reply
- There was no sarcasm in my post
- There was no slap-down handed out
- Each of the words used are entirely 10 y/old sister safe
I've resigned myself to the realization that if you're prepared to agree, the best we can do is to agree to disagree. If that still doesn't suit you, I suggest you follow point 4 of "HOW TO ANSWER A QUESTION" with regards to my post that you deem so awful. Should there be sufficient repetitions of that direction, my post will evaporate. Before that point, I will not be taking a step backwards.
-
I won't bother pointing out the fact that you've changed your complaint when challenged. I will point out that
- I provided information that indicated the problem I had with the offending post
- There was no insult in my reply
- There was no sarcasm in my post
- There was no slap-down handed out
- Each of the words used are entirely 10 y/old sister safe
I've resigned myself to the realization that if you're prepared to agree, the best we can do is to agree to disagree. If that still doesn't suit you, I suggest you follow point 4 of "HOW TO ANSWER A QUESTION" with regards to my post that you deem so awful. Should there be sufficient repetitions of that direction, my post will evaporate. Before that point, I will not be taking a step backwards.
-
enhzflep wrote:
I won't bother pointing out the fact that you've changed your complaint when challenged.
I've changed nothing; you are merely trying to justify your use of offensive language.
-
Indeed. On reflection, I did make a muck of that. I'd erroneously recalled that you first declared it an insult. Clearly, your definition of offensive and mine do not match. However, it is kid-sister safe. So, do we agree to disagree?:java:
-
enhzflep wrote:
So, do we agree to disagree?[Coffee]
Sure, although I'm drinking tea at the moment.
-
And just for the record, nothing in the foregoing exchange changes my opinion of your technical abilities (which is on the high side).
That's very kind of you to mention your favourable view. I have the same opinion of you. I eagerly anticipate the content of your responses whenever I see your username. (perhaps less so for the preceding conversation, though that's another matter :laugh: ) Gee computing is easy when people and personalities aren't involved! Upwards and onwards... Regards, Simon.
-
That's very kind of you to mention your favourable view. I have the same opinion of you. I eagerly anticipate the content of your responses whenever I see your username. (perhaps less so for the preceding conversation, though that's another matter :laugh: ) Gee computing is easy when people and personalities aren't involved! Upwards and onwards... Regards, Simon.
