Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Database & SysAdmin
  3. Database
  4. OR in a JOIN

OR in a JOIN

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Database
databasesql-serversysadminalgorithmsregex
29 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P PIEBALDconsult

    I'm having some trouble with a JOIN that involves an OR (in SQL Server). For example:

    SELECT *
    FROM TableA A
    INNER JOIN TableB B
    ON A.Field1=B.Field1
    OR A.Field2=B.Field2

    Quite correctly this produces two output rows for each row in TableA that matches TableB via both Field1 and Field2* -- but for this JOIN I want to output only one row when both match (preferably the result of the Field1 match, and only report the Field2 match if Field1 doesn't match). * Clarification -- when it matches two rows in TableB; one via Field1 and the other via Field2. I haven't done much searching for pointers because I don't think it's possible, however I'm posting here just in case someone here knows of a way or a simple (SQL only) work-around. Edit -- Here's an example:

    SELECT * FROM TableA

    ID Field1 Field2


    10 A E
    11 E D
    12 A D

    SELECT * FROM TableB

    ID Field1 Field2


    20 A B
    21 C D

    10 will match only 20 ; 11 will match only 21 ; 12 will match both 20 and 21 -- so I want 20.

    ID Field1 Field2 ID Field1 Field2
    10 A E 20 A B <-- I want this row
    11 E D 21 C D <-- I want this row
    12 A D 20 A B <-- I want this row
    12 A D 21 C D <-- I don't want this row

    Luc's and pmpdesign's suggestions yield the same output. Here's a variation of Bernhard's suggestion, which seems to work:

    WITH cte1 AS
    (
    SELECT A.ID aID
    , A.Field1 aField1
    , A.Field2 aField2
    , B.ID bID
    , B.Field1 bField1
    , B.Field2 bField2
    FROM TableA A
    INNER JOIN TableB B
    ON A.Field1=B.Field1
    )
    , cte2 AS
    (
    SELECT A.ID aID
    , A.Field1 aField1
    , A.Field2 aField2
    , B.ID bID
    , B.Field1 bField1
    , B.Field2 bField2
    FROM TableA A
    INNER JOIN TableB B
    ON A.Field2=B.Field2
    )
    SELECT *
    FROM cte1
    UNION ALL
    SELECT C2.*
    FROM cte2 C2
    LEFT OUTER JOIN cte1 C1
    ON C2.aID=C1.aID
    WHERE C1.aID IS NULL

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Paul Conrad
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Is it possible to try this through some stored procedure?

    ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Conrad

      Is it possible to try this through some stored procedure?

      ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

      P Offline
      P Offline
      PIEBALDconsult
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      I don't know whether or not such a stored procedure could be devised, but if so, it could be executed.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P PIEBALDconsult

        I'm having some trouble with a JOIN that involves an OR (in SQL Server). For example:

        SELECT *
        FROM TableA A
        INNER JOIN TableB B
        ON A.Field1=B.Field1
        OR A.Field2=B.Field2

        Quite correctly this produces two output rows for each row in TableA that matches TableB via both Field1 and Field2* -- but for this JOIN I want to output only one row when both match (preferably the result of the Field1 match, and only report the Field2 match if Field1 doesn't match). * Clarification -- when it matches two rows in TableB; one via Field1 and the other via Field2. I haven't done much searching for pointers because I don't think it's possible, however I'm posting here just in case someone here knows of a way or a simple (SQL only) work-around. Edit -- Here's an example:

        SELECT * FROM TableA

        ID Field1 Field2


        10 A E
        11 E D
        12 A D

        SELECT * FROM TableB

        ID Field1 Field2


        20 A B
        21 C D

        10 will match only 20 ; 11 will match only 21 ; 12 will match both 20 and 21 -- so I want 20.

        ID Field1 Field2 ID Field1 Field2
        10 A E 20 A B <-- I want this row
        11 E D 21 C D <-- I want this row
        12 A D 20 A B <-- I want this row
        12 A D 21 C D <-- I don't want this row

        Luc's and pmpdesign's suggestions yield the same output. Here's a variation of Bernhard's suggestion, which seems to work:

        WITH cte1 AS
        (
        SELECT A.ID aID
        , A.Field1 aField1
        , A.Field2 aField2
        , B.ID bID
        , B.Field1 bField1
        , B.Field2 bField2
        FROM TableA A
        INNER JOIN TableB B
        ON A.Field1=B.Field1
        )
        , cte2 AS
        (
        SELECT A.ID aID
        , A.Field1 aField1
        , A.Field2 aField2
        , B.ID bID
        , B.Field1 bField1
        , B.Field2 bField2
        FROM TableA A
        INNER JOIN TableB B
        ON A.Field2=B.Field2
        )
        SELECT *
        FROM cte1
        UNION ALL
        SELECT C2.*
        FROM cte2 C2
        LEFT OUTER JOIN cte1 C1
        ON C2.aID=C1.aID
        WHERE C1.aID IS NULL

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Luc Pattyn
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Ah, I didn't know logic operators were allowed in the ON clause, but as they are, why not just exploit them to the fullest:

        SELECT *
        FROM TableA A
        INNER JOIN TableB B
        ON A.Field1=B.Field1
        OR (A.Field1<>B.Field1 AND A.Field2=B.Field2)

        Maybe now is the time for a :java:?

        Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

        P P 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • L Luc Pattyn

          Ah, I didn't know logic operators were allowed in the ON clause, but as they are, why not just exploit them to the fullest:

          SELECT *
          FROM TableA A
          INNER JOIN TableB B
          ON A.Field1=B.Field1
          OR (A.Field1<>B.Field1 AND A.Field2=B.Field2)

          Maybe now is the time for a :java:?

          Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Conrad
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Checked it out, and it seems to work :-D

          ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Conrad

            Checked it out, and it seems to work :-D

            ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Luc Pattyn
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Thanks. :)

            Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Luc Pattyn

              Ah, I didn't know logic operators were allowed in the ON clause, but as they are, why not just exploit them to the fullest:

              SELECT *
              FROM TableA A
              INNER JOIN TableB B
              ON A.Field1=B.Field1
              OR (A.Field1<>B.Field1 AND A.Field2=B.Field2)

              Maybe now is the time for a :java:?

              Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              :doh: The :java: hadn't worked. Neither did the tequila. Trying it now... Edit: No, that doesn't work -- because there are two different rows.

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                :doh: The :java: hadn't worked. Neither did the tequila. Trying it now... Edit: No, that doesn't work -- because there are two different rows.

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paul Conrad
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Do you have a sample data set that you are using?

                ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  I'm having some trouble with a JOIN that involves an OR (in SQL Server). For example:

                  SELECT *
                  FROM TableA A
                  INNER JOIN TableB B
                  ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                  OR A.Field2=B.Field2

                  Quite correctly this produces two output rows for each row in TableA that matches TableB via both Field1 and Field2* -- but for this JOIN I want to output only one row when both match (preferably the result of the Field1 match, and only report the Field2 match if Field1 doesn't match). * Clarification -- when it matches two rows in TableB; one via Field1 and the other via Field2. I haven't done much searching for pointers because I don't think it's possible, however I'm posting here just in case someone here knows of a way or a simple (SQL only) work-around. Edit -- Here's an example:

                  SELECT * FROM TableA

                  ID Field1 Field2


                  10 A E
                  11 E D
                  12 A D

                  SELECT * FROM TableB

                  ID Field1 Field2


                  20 A B
                  21 C D

                  10 will match only 20 ; 11 will match only 21 ; 12 will match both 20 and 21 -- so I want 20.

                  ID Field1 Field2 ID Field1 Field2
                  10 A E 20 A B <-- I want this row
                  11 E D 21 C D <-- I want this row
                  12 A D 20 A B <-- I want this row
                  12 A D 21 C D <-- I don't want this row

                  Luc's and pmpdesign's suggestions yield the same output. Here's a variation of Bernhard's suggestion, which seems to work:

                  WITH cte1 AS
                  (
                  SELECT A.ID aID
                  , A.Field1 aField1
                  , A.Field2 aField2
                  , B.ID bID
                  , B.Field1 bField1
                  , B.Field2 bField2
                  FROM TableA A
                  INNER JOIN TableB B
                  ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                  )
                  , cte2 AS
                  (
                  SELECT A.ID aID
                  , A.Field1 aField1
                  , A.Field2 aField2
                  , B.ID bID
                  , B.Field1 bField1
                  , B.Field2 bField2
                  FROM TableA A
                  INNER JOIN TableB B
                  ON A.Field2=B.Field2
                  )
                  SELECT *
                  FROM cte1
                  UNION ALL
                  SELECT C2.*
                  FROM cte2 C2
                  LEFT OUTER JOIN cte1 C1
                  ON C2.aID=C1.aID
                  WHERE C1.aID IS NULL

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  pmpdesign
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Without a dataset I can't be sure, but have you tried

                  SELECT DISTINCT * FROM...

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                    I'm having some trouble with a JOIN that involves an OR (in SQL Server). For example:

                    SELECT *
                    FROM TableA A
                    INNER JOIN TableB B
                    ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                    OR A.Field2=B.Field2

                    Quite correctly this produces two output rows for each row in TableA that matches TableB via both Field1 and Field2* -- but for this JOIN I want to output only one row when both match (preferably the result of the Field1 match, and only report the Field2 match if Field1 doesn't match). * Clarification -- when it matches two rows in TableB; one via Field1 and the other via Field2. I haven't done much searching for pointers because I don't think it's possible, however I'm posting here just in case someone here knows of a way or a simple (SQL only) work-around. Edit -- Here's an example:

                    SELECT * FROM TableA

                    ID Field1 Field2


                    10 A E
                    11 E D
                    12 A D

                    SELECT * FROM TableB

                    ID Field1 Field2


                    20 A B
                    21 C D

                    10 will match only 20 ; 11 will match only 21 ; 12 will match both 20 and 21 -- so I want 20.

                    ID Field1 Field2 ID Field1 Field2
                    10 A E 20 A B <-- I want this row
                    11 E D 21 C D <-- I want this row
                    12 A D 20 A B <-- I want this row
                    12 A D 21 C D <-- I don't want this row

                    Luc's and pmpdesign's suggestions yield the same output. Here's a variation of Bernhard's suggestion, which seems to work:

                    WITH cte1 AS
                    (
                    SELECT A.ID aID
                    , A.Field1 aField1
                    , A.Field2 aField2
                    , B.ID bID
                    , B.Field1 bField1
                    , B.Field2 bField2
                    FROM TableA A
                    INNER JOIN TableB B
                    ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                    )
                    , cte2 AS
                    (
                    SELECT A.ID aID
                    , A.Field1 aField1
                    , A.Field2 aField2
                    , B.ID bID
                    , B.Field1 bField1
                    , B.Field2 bField2
                    FROM TableA A
                    INNER JOIN TableB B
                    ON A.Field2=B.Field2
                    )
                    SELECT *
                    FROM cte1
                    UNION ALL
                    SELECT C2.*
                    FROM cte2 C2
                    LEFT OUTER JOIN cte1 C1
                    ON C2.aID=C1.aID
                    WHERE C1.aID IS NULL

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bernhard Hiller
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    A complicated UNION:

                    SELECT *
                    FROM TableA A
                    INNER JOIN TableB B
                    ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                    UNION
                    SELECT *
                    FROM TableA A
                    INNER JOIN TableB B
                    ON A.Field2=B.Field2
                    WHERE A.ID NOT IN
                    (
                    SELECT ID
                    FROM TableA A
                    INNER JOIN TableB B
                    ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                    )

                    assuming that ID is the primary key of TableA.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P pmpdesign

                      Without a dataset I can't be sure, but have you tried

                      SELECT DISTINCT * FROM...

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      PIEBALDconsult
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      No, that won't work -- the two resultant rows are distinct.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Bernhard Hiller

                        A complicated UNION:

                        SELECT *
                        FROM TableA A
                        INNER JOIN TableB B
                        ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                        UNION
                        SELECT *
                        FROM TableA A
                        INNER JOIN TableB B
                        ON A.Field2=B.Field2
                        WHERE A.ID NOT IN
                        (
                        SELECT ID
                        FROM TableA A
                        INNER JOIN TableB B
                        ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                        )

                        assuming that ID is the primary key of TableA.

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Possibly, but no, no primary key. Tried it, and it seems to work. :thumbsup: It may take a while to run on the data though. :sigh:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Paul Conrad

                          Do you have a sample data set that you are using?

                          ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          PIEBALDconsult
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          I'll cobble something up.

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PIEBALDconsult

                            I'm having some trouble with a JOIN that involves an OR (in SQL Server). For example:

                            SELECT *
                            FROM TableA A
                            INNER JOIN TableB B
                            ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                            OR A.Field2=B.Field2

                            Quite correctly this produces two output rows for each row in TableA that matches TableB via both Field1 and Field2* -- but for this JOIN I want to output only one row when both match (preferably the result of the Field1 match, and only report the Field2 match if Field1 doesn't match). * Clarification -- when it matches two rows in TableB; one via Field1 and the other via Field2. I haven't done much searching for pointers because I don't think it's possible, however I'm posting here just in case someone here knows of a way or a simple (SQL only) work-around. Edit -- Here's an example:

                            SELECT * FROM TableA

                            ID Field1 Field2


                            10 A E
                            11 E D
                            12 A D

                            SELECT * FROM TableB

                            ID Field1 Field2


                            20 A B
                            21 C D

                            10 will match only 20 ; 11 will match only 21 ; 12 will match both 20 and 21 -- so I want 20.

                            ID Field1 Field2 ID Field1 Field2
                            10 A E 20 A B <-- I want this row
                            11 E D 21 C D <-- I want this row
                            12 A D 20 A B <-- I want this row
                            12 A D 21 C D <-- I don't want this row

                            Luc's and pmpdesign's suggestions yield the same output. Here's a variation of Bernhard's suggestion, which seems to work:

                            WITH cte1 AS
                            (
                            SELECT A.ID aID
                            , A.Field1 aField1
                            , A.Field2 aField2
                            , B.ID bID
                            , B.Field1 bField1
                            , B.Field2 bField2
                            FROM TableA A
                            INNER JOIN TableB B
                            ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                            )
                            , cte2 AS
                            (
                            SELECT A.ID aID
                            , A.Field1 aField1
                            , A.Field2 aField2
                            , B.ID bID
                            , B.Field1 bField1
                            , B.Field2 bField2
                            FROM TableA A
                            INNER JOIN TableB B
                            ON A.Field2=B.Field2
                            )
                            SELECT *
                            FROM cte1
                            UNION ALL
                            SELECT C2.*
                            FROM cte2 C2
                            LEFT OUTER JOIN cte1 C1
                            ON C2.aID=C1.aID
                            WHERE C1.aID IS NULL

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Chris Meech
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            To have the duplicates removed, I think a union would do that.

                            SELECT *
                            FROM TableA A
                            INNER JOIN TableB B
                            ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                            UNION
                            SELECT *
                            FROM TableA A
                            INNER JOIN TableB B
                            ON A.Field1<>B.Field1 AND A.Field2=B.Field2
                            ;

                            Try that. :)

                            Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

                            P 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Chris Meech

                              To have the duplicates removed, I think a union would do that.

                              SELECT *
                              FROM TableA A
                              INNER JOIN TableB B
                              ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                              UNION
                              SELECT *
                              FROM TableA A
                              INNER JOIN TableB B
                              ON A.Field1<>B.Field1 AND A.Field2=B.Field2
                              ;

                              Try that. :)

                              Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PIEBALDconsult
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              I think that's basically what Luc suggested -- and it doesn't work.

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P PIEBALDconsult

                                I think that's basically what Luc suggested -- and it doesn't work.

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Chris Meech
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                It's similar to what other's have suggested except that it's a union of the two result sets, which should eliminate any duplicates.

                                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P PIEBALDconsult

                                  I'll cobble something up.

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  Paul Conrad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  If it is possible, that would be cool so there can be a data set to test against and see what the expected results are :)

                                  ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Chris Meech

                                    It's similar to what other's have suggested except that it's a union of the two result sets, which should eliminate any duplicates.

                                    Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    PIEBALDconsult
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Chris Meech wrote:

                                    should eliminate any duplicates.

                                    Except it doesn't. I have added some clarification and sample data to my post.

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Paul Conrad

                                      If it is possible, that would be cool so there can be a data set to test against and see what the expected results are :)

                                      ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                                      P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      PIEBALDconsult
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      I added it to the post with some clarification.

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P PIEBALDconsult

                                        I added it to the post with some clarification.

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Paul Conrad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Coolness! I will check it out soon and see if there's anything I can add to this thread in terms of a solution :)

                                        ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                                          I'm having some trouble with a JOIN that involves an OR (in SQL Server). For example:

                                          SELECT *
                                          FROM TableA A
                                          INNER JOIN TableB B
                                          ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                                          OR A.Field2=B.Field2

                                          Quite correctly this produces two output rows for each row in TableA that matches TableB via both Field1 and Field2* -- but for this JOIN I want to output only one row when both match (preferably the result of the Field1 match, and only report the Field2 match if Field1 doesn't match). * Clarification -- when it matches two rows in TableB; one via Field1 and the other via Field2. I haven't done much searching for pointers because I don't think it's possible, however I'm posting here just in case someone here knows of a way or a simple (SQL only) work-around. Edit -- Here's an example:

                                          SELECT * FROM TableA

                                          ID Field1 Field2


                                          10 A E
                                          11 E D
                                          12 A D

                                          SELECT * FROM TableB

                                          ID Field1 Field2


                                          20 A B
                                          21 C D

                                          10 will match only 20 ; 11 will match only 21 ; 12 will match both 20 and 21 -- so I want 20.

                                          ID Field1 Field2 ID Field1 Field2
                                          10 A E 20 A B <-- I want this row
                                          11 E D 21 C D <-- I want this row
                                          12 A D 20 A B <-- I want this row
                                          12 A D 21 C D <-- I don't want this row

                                          Luc's and pmpdesign's suggestions yield the same output. Here's a variation of Bernhard's suggestion, which seems to work:

                                          WITH cte1 AS
                                          (
                                          SELECT A.ID aID
                                          , A.Field1 aField1
                                          , A.Field2 aField2
                                          , B.ID bID
                                          , B.Field1 bField1
                                          , B.Field2 bField2
                                          FROM TableA A
                                          INNER JOIN TableB B
                                          ON A.Field1=B.Field1
                                          )
                                          , cte2 AS
                                          (
                                          SELECT A.ID aID
                                          , A.Field1 aField1
                                          , A.Field2 aField2
                                          , B.ID bID
                                          , B.Field1 bField1
                                          , B.Field2 bField2
                                          FROM TableA A
                                          INNER JOIN TableB B
                                          ON A.Field2=B.Field2
                                          )
                                          SELECT *
                                          FROM cte1
                                          UNION ALL
                                          SELECT C2.*
                                          FROM cte2 C2
                                          LEFT OUTER JOIN cte1 C1
                                          ON C2.aID=C1.aID
                                          WHERE C1.aID IS NULL

                                          P Offline
                                          P Offline
                                          Paul Conrad
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                                          so I want 20

                                          Do you want 20 in both rows with the Id from Table A being 10, and 12?

                                          ""Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups