Voting
-
Is this the new Cryptic Crossword Clue?
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
:)
-
Unable to resolve situation, condition exists. Square 1
-
I read it as "nothings going to change, so we're back to square 1."
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
-
I read it as "nothings going to change, so we're back to square 1."
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
-
I read it as "nothings going to change, so we're back to square 1."
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
If the moves are legal and black's king is in checkmate, then what is the point of live with it or compromise, because black has already lost the game. If “true” as it occurs in “true for X” is just the ordinary, nonrelative truth predicate, then it is unclear what “for X” (or “as assessed by X”) adds. On the other hand, if the occurrence of “true” in “true for X” is like the “cat” in “cattle”—an orthographic, not a semantic, part—then the relativist needs to explain what “true-for-X" means and what it has to do with truth, as ordinarily conceived
-
If the moves are legal and black's king is in checkmate, then what is the point of live with it or compromise, because black has already lost the game. If “true” as it occurs in “true for X” is just the ordinary, nonrelative truth predicate, then it is unclear what “for X” (or “as assessed by X”) adds. On the other hand, if the occurrence of “true” in “true for X” is like the “cat” in “cattle”—an orthographic, not a semantic, part—then the relativist needs to explain what “true-for-X" means and what it has to do with truth, as ordinarily conceived
Mate, I would stop smoking that special weed you found outside if I were you. ;)
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
-
Mate, I would stop smoking that special weed you found outside if I were you. ;)
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
:laugh:
-
Unable to resolve situation, condition exists. Square 1
Condition exists, unable to resolve situation, square 1 therefore cease case else infinite recursion. Makes as much sense as your reply.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Mate, I would stop smoking that special weed you found outside if I were you. ;)
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier
Or copying and pasting from dodgy philosophical papers.[^] It's all an attempt to get into the knickers of impressionable female literature students anyway. Philosophy that is, not posting on the code project. Actually, come to think of it, that's pretty much what the whole of human endeavour is, at least getting a bit, so posting in the code project too.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Many miscreants are voting down without any reason. For example see the thread below, it's an accepted solution but voted down by a miscreant. [^] I suggest 1. Voting should be re-evaluated. 2. Should display the voters and their vote(1-5). Thanks, Kuthuparakkal
I voted this message up because I love the word "miscreant" ! best, Bill
"When it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry. The poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images." Niels Bohr
-
If the moves are legal and black's king is in checkmate, then what is the point of live with it or compromise, because black has already lost the game. If “true” as it occurs in “true for X” is just the ordinary, nonrelative truth predicate, then it is unclear what “for X” (or “as assessed by X”) adds. On the other hand, if the occurrence of “true” in “true for X” is like the “cat” in “cattle”—an orthographic, not a semantic, part—then the relativist needs to explain what “true-for-X" means and what it has to do with truth, as ordinarily conceived
Oh crapola: now, I read, after upvoting this, Keith Barrow has "outed" your source: I thought we had an original weird-warbler here :( Upvoted for being a fine example of glossolalia ! You could be channeling either Cantor or Godel in their episodes of lunacy as they each struggled with the problem-space of the Aleph, the ordinality of infinities. Are you reading Lacan or Derrida right now, and have you taken any herbs recently ? Vannakum, Bill
"When it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry. The poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images." Niels Bohr