Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. Visual Studio 2015 & .NET 4.6
  4. Windows XP & Framework 4.5

Windows XP & Framework 4.5

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Visual Studio 2015 & .NET 4.6
beta-testinghelp
8 Posts 5 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Clifford Nelson
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    There are rumors going around that XP will not run Framework 4.5. In the beta you could not run on Windows XP, and that apparently was anounced. There apparently has been pressure put on Microsoft to support 4.5. I know there were some earlier discussions about this issue, and did not see a followup.

    Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Clifford Nelson

      There are rumors going around that XP will not run Framework 4.5. In the beta you could not run on Windows XP, and that apparently was anounced. There apparently has been pressure put on Microsoft to support 4.5. I know there were some earlier discussions about this issue, and did not see a followup.

      Richard DeemingR Offline
      Richard DeemingR Offline
      Richard Deeming
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      That link is for Windows Installer 4.5, not .NET Framework. Microsoft have already confirmed[^] that .NET 4.5 will not run on XP, and have so far failed to comment on the suggestion[^] of providing a 4.0 service pack for XP.


      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

        That link is for Windows Installer 4.5, not .NET Framework. Microsoft have already confirmed[^] that .NET 4.5 will not run on XP, and have so far failed to comment on the suggestion[^] of providing a 4.0 service pack for XP.


        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Clifford Nelson
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Yes, Microsoft seems to be downplaying supporting XP. I discovered I had the wrong link. Have not found any link for framework 4.5 for XP.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Clifford Nelson

          Yes, Microsoft seems to be downplaying supporting XP. I discovered I had the wrong link. Have not found any link for framework 4.5 for XP.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          pip010
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          why M$ is so successful of shooting itself in any foot these days? :^)

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P pip010

            why M$ is so successful of shooting itself in any foot these days? :^)

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Clifford Nelson
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I know that I think that it is pretty crappy that XP is not supported. But you are right, seems to be the MS is shooting itself in the foot these days. Windows 8 apparently sucks as a desktop OS. Of coures MS almost always seems to get OS's wrong the first time. T

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Clifford Nelson

              I know that I think that it is pretty crappy that XP is not supported. But you are right, seems to be the MS is shooting itself in the foot these days. Windows 8 apparently sucks as a desktop OS. Of coures MS almost always seems to get OS's wrong the first time. T

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Pete OHanlon
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Microsoft no longer supports XP. They are trying to get people away from it, and newer features would be hampered by working in the limitations. A lot of people have 64 bit machines now, so it doesn't make sense to stick with XP.

              *pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington

              "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

              CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Pete OHanlon

                Microsoft no longer supports XP. They are trying to get people away from it, and newer features would be hampered by working in the limitations. A lot of people have 64 bit machines now, so it doesn't make sense to stick with XP.

                *pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington

                "Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos

                CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Clifford Nelson
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Of course, it just reduces the number of applications that will use 4.5. In my organization there are still xp machines, and there is lots of money in the organization. That does not include the number of XP personal PCs that are in use and will be in use for many years. There will be a lot of people that will resist 4.5 because of this stupidity. There is not a good reason to move up to Win7. Of course they want people to buy win8, which is not a good enough OS of desktop for people to buy (people complain about adapting to Win. Why upgrade when OS works fine. Which means that framework 4.5 will not be readily adopted by many organizations. Microsoft is just pissing people off. Not good for Microsoft. I am definately pissed at this overisght.

                E 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Clifford Nelson

                  Of course, it just reduces the number of applications that will use 4.5. In my organization there are still xp machines, and there is lots of money in the organization. That does not include the number of XP personal PCs that are in use and will be in use for many years. There will be a lot of people that will resist 4.5 because of this stupidity. There is not a good reason to move up to Win7. Of course they want people to buy win8, which is not a good enough OS of desktop for people to buy (people complain about adapting to Win. Why upgrade when OS works fine. Which means that framework 4.5 will not be readily adopted by many organizations. Microsoft is just pissing people off. Not good for Microsoft. I am definately pissed at this overisght.

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Expert Coming
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  It isn't an oversight. It is a deliberate move. Windows XP is over 10 years old. I personally feel Microsoft has done a great job of supporting Windows XP as it is now 3 OSes behind current version. Mainstream support ended in 2009 yet they have still released major updates for it. Windows XP is now in extended support which just covers hotfixes basically. With regard to orgs not adopting framework 4.5 due to it not supporting Windows XP, I've actually seen that as a pretty good pressure point on management to finally upgrade those machines to more current OSes.

                  The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups