Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Whatever happened to the Hurd? – The story of the GNU OS

Whatever happened to the Hurd? – The story of the GNU OS

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
linuxquestion
6 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    michaelvdnest
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Linux User

    Work began on the Hurd, the true kernel of the GNU operating system, in May 1991, but it has yet to materialise as a production-ready kernel. Richard Hillesley tells the story…

    _ T 7 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M michaelvdnest

      Linux User

      Work began on the Hurd, the true kernel of the GNU operating system, in May 1991, but it has yet to materialise as a production-ready kernel. Richard Hillesley tells the story…

      _ Offline
      _ Offline
      _beauw_
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I've been avoiding the whole Linux thing in the hope that this will materialize.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • _ _beauw_

        I've been avoiding the whole Linux thing in the hope that this will materialize.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        LloydA111
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Really?

        =====
        \ | /
        \|/
        |
        |-----|
        | |
        |_ |
        _) | /
        _) __/_
        _) ____
        | /|
        | / |
        | |
        |-----|
        |

        ===

        _ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L LloydA111

          Really?

          =====
          \ | /
          \|/
          |
          |-----|
          | |
          |_ |
          _) | /
          _) __/_
          _) ____
          | /|
          | / |
          | |
          |-----|
          |

          ===

          _ Offline
          _ Offline
          _beauw_
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          No; note my use of the "joke" icon. In all seriousness, I probably use Cygwin more than any other UNIX-style environment.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M michaelvdnest

            Linux User

            Work began on the Hurd, the true kernel of the GNU operating system, in May 1991, but it has yet to materialise as a production-ready kernel. Richard Hillesley tells the story…

            T Offline
            T Offline
            Terrence Dorsey
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Interesting... particularly in the context of prominent GNU maintainers stepping down.

            Director of Content Development, The Code Project

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M michaelvdnest

              Linux User

              Work began on the Hurd, the true kernel of the GNU operating system, in May 1991, but it has yet to materialise as a production-ready kernel. Richard Hillesley tells the story…

              7 Offline
              7 Offline
              77465
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Nice review. When Linux had got dynamically pluggable modules, that is long ago, HURD had lost its single advantage. Since it was equally possible not to make modules pluggable, Linux was more flexible and had, even theoretically, better performance. No wonder nobody wanted HURD, a solution in search for a problem. The only real difference between Linux and HURD is that HURD makes it easier for everybody to be a kernel hacker - something the process of Linux kernel development have proven to be fatal. Mr. Stollman thought that loosely organized crowds can do everything and was wrong. Linux has one digit percent penetration on the desktop just because the quality bar for poorly organized crowds in not too high. Mr. Stallman thought that what looks like a better design actually is a better design and was wrong. An experimental proof is always necessary. Finally, Mr. Stallman wanted GNU/Linux revealing his zero understanding of the idea of a trade mark. Tools have no right to claim products, if he was blinded by his ideas enough not to see that, no wonder Linus provided developers with better toys.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups