Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. We should only work 25 hours a week, argues professor

We should only work 25 hours a week, argues professor

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
csscom
9 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Just imagine what you'd do with the other six days[^] (less an hour)

    -------------- TTFN - Kent

    S D W _ 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      Just imagine what you'd do with the other six days[^] (less an hour)

      -------------- TTFN - Kent

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Super Lloyd
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I support that. I'm ready to start now! ^^

      My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kent Sharkey

        Just imagine what you'd do with the other six days[^] (less an hour)

        -------------- TTFN - Kent

        D Offline
        D Offline
        devvvy
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        love the idea but going from say 5 days work to 3 days would probably mean some reduction in salary. however, work typically kills creativity, specially overtime work, that's why western world still leads Asia and China. (worker bee will never understand they can never be #1) so, reducing length of work week may help (but I doubt it, 3 days or 25 hrs a little extreme)

        dev

        W 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D devvvy

          love the idea but going from say 5 days work to 3 days would probably mean some reduction in salary. however, work typically kills creativity, specially overtime work, that's why western world still leads Asia and China. (worker bee will never understand they can never be #1) so, reducing length of work week may help (but I doubt it, 3 days or 25 hrs a little extreme)

          dev

          W Offline
          W Offline
          wout de zeeuw
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Well, if normally works from say 20-60, that's 40 years, but instead 20-80, 60 years. Then you can spread the same work over 50% more years. So you could work 33% less in your younger years. Like here in the Netherlands part of your current income goes into pension build up (about 10%), and taxes that will go into a base salary for pensioned people (not sure how much). One could scrap these institutions (and save a lot of money because these are just money eating money redirection schemes). So I think it's doable if just looking at percentages. However I don't see myself programming anymore at 80! :-D

          Wout

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K Kent Sharkey

            Just imagine what you'd do with the other six days[^] (less an hour)

            -------------- TTFN - Kent

            W Offline
            W Offline
            wout de zeeuw
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Nice article! I have to say I'm too working less than 40 hours at the moment, and enjoying it!

            Wout

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kent Sharkey

              Just imagine what you'd do with the other six days[^] (less an hour)

              -------------- TTFN - Kent

              _ Offline
              _ Offline
              _beauw_
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It's hard for me to reconcile that claim with the uncertainty most people experience with regard to things like retirement and healthcare. I don't feel much of an urge to spend an additional 15+ hours per week just goofing off until such questions are addressed for me and my family.

              K C 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • _ _beauw_

                It's hard for me to reconcile that claim with the uncertainty most people experience with regard to things like retirement and healthcare. I don't feel much of an urge to spend an additional 15+ hours per week just goofing off until such questions are addressed for me and my family.

                K Offline
                K Offline
                Kent Sharkey
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Well, I'm not sure that I'd count, "spending time with loved ones" as "goofing off". Certainly not in front of them anyway. But I see your point. It would definitely require a lot of changes to society to make this work. Retiring at 80 wouldn't leave that many people left to retire.

                -------------- TTFN - Kent

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • _ _beauw_

                  It's hard for me to reconcile that claim with the uncertainty most people experience with regard to things like retirement and healthcare. I don't feel much of an urge to spend an additional 15+ hours per week just goofing off until such questions are addressed for me and my family.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  C P User 3
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  You won't spend it goofing off. You will spend it driving your car farther and farther to the sub-sub-sub-sub-suburb which is the only place you will be able to afford a house. The 90 minute commute is already common in California, has been for decades, and is now spreading to other areas as well

                  _ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C C P User 3

                    You won't spend it goofing off. You will spend it driving your car farther and farther to the sub-sub-sub-sub-suburb which is the only place you will be able to afford a house. The 90 minute commute is already common in California, has been for decades, and is now spreading to other areas as well

                    _ Offline
                    _ Offline
                    _beauw_
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    My wife disaproves of suburbs (and I disapprove of 90-minute commutes). But I have seen some otherwise reasonable people fall into that trap...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups