QA Spammer
-
This member[^] replied to an year old question how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] and the solution doesn't make sense.
-
This member[^] replied to an year old question how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] and the solution doesn't make sense.
I see no solution - not even as a deleted solution.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
-
I see no solution - not even as a deleted solution.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
AFAIK, we cannot see the deleted stuff anymore.
Sandeep Mewara Microsoft ASP.NET MVP 2012 & 2013 [My Blog] [My Latest Post]: How to extend a WPF Textbox to Custom Picker
-
I see no solution - not even as a deleted solution.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
That's weird. When i saw that question it had 3 solutions earlier. The 4th one was entered today. Here is a Screen shot[^] i took just in case someone deletes solution 4. Edit: When i click on how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] it shows no solutions, then when i click on the question's subject it shows 2 answers. Do you think its a bug ?
-
That's weird. When i saw that question it had 3 solutions earlier. The 4th one was entered today. Here is a Screen shot[^] i took just in case someone deletes solution 4. Edit: When i click on how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] it shows no solutions, then when i click on the question's subject it shows 2 answers. Do you think its a bug ?
All gone - no answers there at all. I marking him as "Abuse" anyway.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
-
All gone - no answers there at all. I marking him as "Abuse" anyway.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
-
All gone - no answers there at all. I marking him as "Abuse" anyway.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
-
That's weird. When i saw that question it had 3 solutions earlier. The 4th one was entered today. Here is a Screen shot[^] i took just in case someone deletes solution 4. Edit: When i click on how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] it shows no solutions, then when i click on the question's subject it shows 2 answers. Do you think its a bug ?
__TR__ wrote:
Edit:
When i click on how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] it shows no solutions, then when i click on the question's subject it shows 2 answers. Do you think its a bug ?I don't think it's a bug. Your link refers to:
www.codeproject.com/Answers/544241/howplustoplusaddplustemplatepluscolumnplusinplusgr#answer4
Your link refers to an answer. But the subject refers to:
www.codeproject.com/Questions/324739/how-to-add-template-column-in-gridview-at-runtime
The subject refers to a question.
In some cases, my signature will be longer than my message...
<em style="color:red"> <b>ProgramFOX</b></em>
ProgramFOX
-
__TR__ wrote:
Edit:
When i click on how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] it shows no solutions, then when i click on the question's subject it shows 2 answers. Do you think its a bug ?I don't think it's a bug. Your link refers to:
www.codeproject.com/Answers/544241/howplustoplusaddplustemplatepluscolumnplusinplusgr#answer4
Your link refers to an answer. But the subject refers to:
www.codeproject.com/Questions/324739/how-to-add-template-column-in-gridview-at-runtime
The subject refers to a question.
In some cases, my signature will be longer than my message...
<em style="color:red"> <b>ProgramFOX</b></em>
ProgramFOX
-
This member[^] replied to an year old question how to add template column in gridview at runtime[^] and the solution doesn't make sense.
I answer old stuff on occasion because I fail to look at the date... :laugh: ...but at least my solution make sense...most of the time...I think...:~
-
I answer old stuff on occasion because I fail to look at the date... :laugh: ...but at least my solution make sense...most of the time...I think...:~
Quote:
I answer old stuff on occasion because I fail to look at the date...
You mean like this[^]? :) We can all make mistakes like that, especially if someone else had resurrected the question prior to that. I believe we look at the member's profile and/or the content of the answer before we splatter their profiles all over this forum. I get suspicious when I see a question with 1000 views or more pop to the top of the list. Quite often it is a toolkit spammer that found an old question to answer. Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
-
Quote:
I answer old stuff on occasion because I fail to look at the date...
You mean like this[^]? :) We can all make mistakes like that, especially if someone else had resurrected the question prior to that. I believe we look at the member's profile and/or the content of the answer before we splatter their profiles all over this forum. I get suspicious when I see a question with 1000 views or more pop to the top of the list. Quite often it is a toolkit spammer that found an old question to answer. Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
SoMad wrote:
I was looking through InstallShield Q&A posts because I'm having a bug with one of my scripts... answered that because it's one of the first things that comes up when you do a search. If I stumbled onto that unanswered question, so will anyone else looking for help... so I posted a solution (mostly just referencing something I had answered before). I'm getting tired of InstallShield, I'm probably going to move all of my stuff to InnoSetup. Although my version of InstallShield could probably be classified as an antique by now, so understandably, there's bugs I have to work around.
-
I answer old stuff on occasion because I fail to look at the date... :laugh: ...but at least my solution make sense...most of the time...I think...:~
Albert Holguin wrote:
I answer old stuff on occasion because I fail to look at the date
I don't think there is anything wrong with answering old posts if it has not been answered or if there is a better solution than the once given earlier. It will be helpful to anyone referring that post in the future. I usually report the solution as abuse if it looks like output of a hashing function.
-
SoMad wrote:
I was looking through InstallShield Q&A posts because I'm having a bug with one of my scripts... answered that because it's one of the first things that comes up when you do a search. If I stumbled onto that unanswered question, so will anyone else looking for help... so I posted a solution (mostly just referencing something I had answered before). I'm getting tired of InstallShield, I'm probably going to move all of my stuff to InnoSetup. Although my version of InstallShield could probably be classified as an antique by now, so understandably, there's bugs I have to work around.
-
That sounds like a perfectly valid reason and there was no other answer to the question. Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
That one I can explain... there's some I've answered that it's simply because someone updated them and they go to the top of the list... :-O
-
Albert Holguin wrote:
I answer old stuff on occasion because I fail to look at the date
I don't think there is anything wrong with answering old posts if it has not been answered or if there is a better solution than the once given earlier. It will be helpful to anyone referring that post in the future. I usually report the solution as abuse if it looks like output of a hashing function.
Yeah, nothing bothers me more than finding a post somewhere with someone that has the same exact problem I'm having and a thread with absolutely no solutions.
