Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. Algorithms
  4. Complexity and Routing Problems

Complexity and Routing Problems

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Algorithms
algorithmshelpquestion
3 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    brkonja
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello, I know that the Traveling Salesman Problem has a solution space of (n-1)! / 2 for n = nodes, when the symetrick TSP is considered. But, is there any mathematical way to show how big a solution space a Arc Routing Problem, like the Capacitated Arc Routing Problem have? Or any other way to show (describe) why ít is a complex problem? In all the literature it is only described as NP-hard, and thats it. Thanks

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B brkonja

      Hello, I know that the Traveling Salesman Problem has a solution space of (n-1)! / 2 for n = nodes, when the symetrick TSP is considered. But, is there any mathematical way to show how big a solution space a Arc Routing Problem, like the Capacitated Arc Routing Problem have? Or any other way to show (describe) why ít is a complex problem? In all the literature it is only described as NP-hard, and thats it. Thanks

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Alan Balkany
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      The standard way to show a problem is NP is to show that it reduces to a known NP problem. In other words, you show transformations (which must run in P (polynomial) time) that transform any instance of the problem to an instance of a known NP problem.

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Alan Balkany

        The standard way to show a problem is NP is to show that it reduces to a known NP problem. In other words, you show transformations (which must run in P (polynomial) time) that transform any instance of the problem to an instance of a known NP problem.

        B Offline
        B Offline
        BupeChombaDerrick
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        If you are interested in image processing, you might want to take a look at this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euHMcUfqpVo[^] :)

        “Everything is simple when you take your time to analyze it.”

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups