Hey religionfags, defend this
-
On the other hand, those kids would probably have been tainted by their parents' insanity, so good riddance.
harold aptroot wrote:
On the other hand, those kids would probably have been tainted by their parents' insanity, so good riddance.
I suspect there are those that would suggest that a callous statement like that would prove that one was unfit to raise children because of course the children would have the same attitude when they were adults. But of course this goes back to my contention that determining what is 'best' is probably impossible.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
They died. And not even by accident. It's hard to do a worse job than that.
Many children die. And in many cases one can argue that the parents decisions/lifestyle either directly or indirectly was the cause. And there are certainly cases where people both before and after claimed that the decisions/lifestyle was dangerous. Do you need examples?
-
"good parents"[^] Protip: you can't.
In most civilized countries mentally disordered people are never guilty... that should be fairly easy to defend for any average lawyer.
Seulement, dans certains cas, n'est-ce pas, on n'entend guère que ce qu'on désire entendre et ce qui vous arrange le mieux... [^]
-
In most civilized countries mentally disordered people are never guilty... that should be fairly easy to defend for any average lawyer.
Seulement, dans certains cas, n'est-ce pas, on n'entend guère que ce qu'on désire entendre et ce qui vous arrange le mieux... [^]
-
Nope, I've got all I need. You're ok with this, so have a nice trip to hell, religionfag.
harold aptroot wrote:
You're ok with this,
I am ok with the US Constitution and how the Supreme Court has interpreted it for about the last 50 years at least.
harold aptroot wrote:
so have a nice trip to hell, religionfag.
That has nothing to do with me.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
You're ok with this,
I am ok with the US Constitution and how the Supreme Court has interpreted it for about the last 50 years at least.
harold aptroot wrote:
so have a nice trip to hell, religionfag.
That has nothing to do with me.
-
Evidently Freedom of Religion does not cover this, because a court ordered them to stop being such idiots.
harold aptroot wrote:
Evidently Freedom of Religion does not cover this, because a court ordered them to stop being such idiots.
Not the Supreme Court. And since the Supreme Court typically only rules on constitutional cases after a lower court has ruled against a citizen, one must of course wait to see how or even if such a determination is made.
-
harold aptroot wrote:
Evidently Freedom of Religion does not cover this, because a court ordered them to stop being such idiots.
Not the Supreme Court. And since the Supreme Court typically only rules on constitutional cases after a lower court has ruled against a citizen, one must of course wait to see how or even if such a determination is made.
-
"good parents"[^] Protip: you can't.
I guess it is better than being stoned to death because of religion.
-
"good parents"[^] Protip: you can't.
Quote:
religionfags
:) Is that something you came up with? You seem to be generalizing that all religious people are this dumb? If so, enough said about you.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Quote:
religionfags
:) Is that something you came up with? You seem to be generalizing that all religious people are this dumb? If so, enough said about you.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Oh so this place isn't completely dead after all :) I didn't come up with it actually, but I wish I had.
ryanb31 wrote:
You seem to be generalizing that all religious people are this dumb?
Of course, classic trolling technique. No one seemed interested in taking the bait, though.
-
Oh so this place isn't completely dead after all :) I didn't come up with it actually, but I wish I had.
ryanb31 wrote:
You seem to be generalizing that all religious people are this dumb?
Of course, classic trolling technique. No one seemed interested in taking the bait, though.
-
Don't you have freecell or solitaire? If your bored, can't you do something better than look for fights? :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Not really, fights are pretty good usually, much more interesting than bloody solitaire..
-
Freecell is better. Solitaire sucks. There's your fight. Sorry, that's all I got. I am too civilized. ;P
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Is there a link to this forum? I happened to find it looking through someone's messages but I don't see a way in the navigation to get to it. Perhaps you should report it in bugs and suggs. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Is there a link to this forum? I happened to find it looking through someone's messages but I don't see a way in the navigation to get to it. Perhaps you should report it in bugs and suggs. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.