Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor
  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. !#$@ those evil conservatives!

!#$@ those evil conservatives!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomtoolsquestion
22 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Losinger

    Jason Henderson wrote: Was this post about Rush? No, it was about some guys making the protesters look like idiots. errr. maybe you didn't read the page you sent me to. it was on Rush's site, full of unattributed text (which given the tone, and the fact that there's a big picture of The Grand Asshole himself right next to it, we can assume it was either written by or endorsed by Rush). Jason Henderson wrote: Probably not, since they served no real purpose other than to make Bill look good. according to the white house, the attacks were to drive Saddam back from attacking the kurds. "Our objectives are limited, but clear. To make Saddam pay a price for the latest act of brutality, and to reduce his ability to threaten his neighbors and America's interest." -clinton so, it's honorable when GWB does it, but despicable when Clinton does it (for all values of "it"). that pretty much sums up the entire dittohead philosophy, doesn't it? Jason Henderson wrote: Did Bill do anything to help in Rwanda? NO! Don't blame Rush for your idol's insensitivity here are two things you should write down and paste to your monitor: 1. opposition to GWB does not mean a love of Clinton. a five year old can find the flaw in that logic. 2. Clinton is not my idol.

    Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

    Fractals

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jason Henderson
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Chris Losinger wrote: errr. maybe you didn't read the page you sent me to. it was on Rush's site, full of unattributed text Uh, I realize that, but the main topic of the post was the anti-anti-war protesters, not Rush. And speaking of Grand A$$hole, I think you're Ranting, Raving and Retardation level is going through the roof. It appears that you hate Rush and all conservatives because they don't believe the same things you do. Isn't that retarded? Chris Losinger wrote: so, it's honorable when GWB does it, but despicable when Clinton does it Or is it the other way around Chris? Upon reflection, I don't recall being a bit upset about him throwing missles into Iraq. However, in light of his other missle attacks (aspirin factory in Sudan and Afganistan) I can see where some would be questioning his motives. Why didn't you cry foul when Clinton did it, or did you? That's what Rush is crying about, the fact that most prominent democrats were all for the missle strikes but now, when there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam, the democrats all line up behind the anti-war protesters. Its not about being against war, its about being against Bush isn't it Chris? You hate him, and you're still mad that he "stole" the election. Chris Losinger wrote: 1. opposition to GWB does not mean a love of Clinton. a five year old can find the flaw in that logic. 2. Clinton is not my idol. Yet you defend him at every opportunity. I don't like Clinton because he lied and he's not interested in helping the country, he's more interested in helping himself. His liberal ideas have nothing to do with my displeasure of him as a person. I'd like to know why you hate Rush so badly. Is it because he has a different opinion than you or is it something else?

    Jason Henderson
    "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

    articles profile

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jason Henderson

      Chris Losinger wrote: errr. maybe you didn't read the page you sent me to. it was on Rush's site, full of unattributed text Uh, I realize that, but the main topic of the post was the anti-anti-war protesters, not Rush. And speaking of Grand A$$hole, I think you're Ranting, Raving and Retardation level is going through the roof. It appears that you hate Rush and all conservatives because they don't believe the same things you do. Isn't that retarded? Chris Losinger wrote: so, it's honorable when GWB does it, but despicable when Clinton does it Or is it the other way around Chris? Upon reflection, I don't recall being a bit upset about him throwing missles into Iraq. However, in light of his other missle attacks (aspirin factory in Sudan and Afganistan) I can see where some would be questioning his motives. Why didn't you cry foul when Clinton did it, or did you? That's what Rush is crying about, the fact that most prominent democrats were all for the missle strikes but now, when there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam, the democrats all line up behind the anti-war protesters. Its not about being against war, its about being against Bush isn't it Chris? You hate him, and you're still mad that he "stole" the election. Chris Losinger wrote: 1. opposition to GWB does not mean a love of Clinton. a five year old can find the flaw in that logic. 2. Clinton is not my idol. Yet you defend him at every opportunity. I don't like Clinton because he lied and he's not interested in helping the country, he's more interested in helping himself. His liberal ideas have nothing to do with my displeasure of him as a person. I'd like to know why you hate Rush so badly. Is it because he has a different opinion than you or is it something else?

      Jason Henderson
      "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

      articles profile

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Losinger
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Jason Henderson wrote: . It appears that you hate Rush and all conservatives because they don't believe the same things you do Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. it doesn't really have anything to do with "conservatism"; in my eyes, he's no better than Al Sharpton or anyone else who polarizes every issue into Us vs Them. Black vs. White, Conservative vs. Liberal, whatever. his whole M.O. is to find a topic, find a way to polarize it, then rant about it. he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality. he isn't interested in balance, objective discussion; he's only interested in pushing the Liberal vs Conservative line - even when it has no bearing on the topic. so it's not "news", but calling it entertainment is a cop-out. Friends is entertainment; Rush speaks about current events and issues and puts a polarized policital spin on everything (everything except his commercial spots, of course). "conservatives" are a different story. but i try hard to let each one of them define themselves before i pass judgement. Jason Henderson wrote: Why didn't you cry foul when Clinton did it, or did you? i did. Jason Henderson wrote: there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam prove it. prove how Iraq is more of a danger than Saudi Arabia, NK or Pakistan. Jason Henderson wrote: fact that most prominent democrats were all for the missle strikes but now, when there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam, the democrats all line up behind the anti-war protesters more democrats voted for GWB's blank check than voted against it, incuding all of the current major democratic presidential candidates. Jason Henderson wrote: Its not about being against war, its about being against Bush isn't it Chris? i don't think there's a valid reason for war. there are many issues that need to be worked on, but i don't think a full-scale invasion, occupation and rebuilding of Iraq is the best way to do it. i can think of better ways to spend half a trillion taxpayer dollars. i dislike GWB for a hundred other things he's done, too. but, i'm not singleminded in it - he's done a couple of things that i thought were decent. overall, i give him a D+.

      J J S S 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Losinger

        Jason Henderson wrote: . It appears that you hate Rush and all conservatives because they don't believe the same things you do Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. it doesn't really have anything to do with "conservatism"; in my eyes, he's no better than Al Sharpton or anyone else who polarizes every issue into Us vs Them. Black vs. White, Conservative vs. Liberal, whatever. his whole M.O. is to find a topic, find a way to polarize it, then rant about it. he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality. he isn't interested in balance, objective discussion; he's only interested in pushing the Liberal vs Conservative line - even when it has no bearing on the topic. so it's not "news", but calling it entertainment is a cop-out. Friends is entertainment; Rush speaks about current events and issues and puts a polarized policital spin on everything (everything except his commercial spots, of course). "conservatives" are a different story. but i try hard to let each one of them define themselves before i pass judgement. Jason Henderson wrote: Why didn't you cry foul when Clinton did it, or did you? i did. Jason Henderson wrote: there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam prove it. prove how Iraq is more of a danger than Saudi Arabia, NK or Pakistan. Jason Henderson wrote: fact that most prominent democrats were all for the missle strikes but now, when there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam, the democrats all line up behind the anti-war protesters more democrats voted for GWB's blank check than voted against it, incuding all of the current major democratic presidential candidates. Jason Henderson wrote: Its not about being against war, its about being against Bush isn't it Chris? i don't think there's a valid reason for war. there are many issues that need to be worked on, but i don't think a full-scale invasion, occupation and rebuilding of Iraq is the best way to do it. i can think of better ways to spend half a trillion taxpayer dollars. i dislike GWB for a hundred other things he's done, too. but, i'm not singleminded in it - he's done a couple of things that i thought were decent. overall, i give him a D+.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        JoeSox
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Chris Losinger wrote: Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. it doesn't really have anything to do with "conservatism"; in my eyes, he's no better than Al Sharpton or anyone else who polarizes every issue into Us vs Them. Black vs. White, Conservative vs. Liberal, whatever. his whole M.O. is to find a topic, find a way to polarize it, then rant about it. Amen Brotha!! Plus, I heard he gets funded by the republican party. I should probably go find that proof one day. Later,
        JoeSox
        www.joeswammi.com
        Untitled[^]

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Losinger

          Jason Henderson wrote: . It appears that you hate Rush and all conservatives because they don't believe the same things you do Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. it doesn't really have anything to do with "conservatism"; in my eyes, he's no better than Al Sharpton or anyone else who polarizes every issue into Us vs Them. Black vs. White, Conservative vs. Liberal, whatever. his whole M.O. is to find a topic, find a way to polarize it, then rant about it. he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality. he isn't interested in balance, objective discussion; he's only interested in pushing the Liberal vs Conservative line - even when it has no bearing on the topic. so it's not "news", but calling it entertainment is a cop-out. Friends is entertainment; Rush speaks about current events and issues and puts a polarized policital spin on everything (everything except his commercial spots, of course). "conservatives" are a different story. but i try hard to let each one of them define themselves before i pass judgement. Jason Henderson wrote: Why didn't you cry foul when Clinton did it, or did you? i did. Jason Henderson wrote: there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam prove it. prove how Iraq is more of a danger than Saudi Arabia, NK or Pakistan. Jason Henderson wrote: fact that most prominent democrats were all for the missle strikes but now, when there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam, the democrats all line up behind the anti-war protesters more democrats voted for GWB's blank check than voted against it, incuding all of the current major democratic presidential candidates. Jason Henderson wrote: Its not about being against war, its about being against Bush isn't it Chris? i don't think there's a valid reason for war. there are many issues that need to be worked on, but i don't think a full-scale invasion, occupation and rebuilding of Iraq is the best way to do it. i can think of better ways to spend half a trillion taxpayer dollars. i dislike GWB for a hundred other things he's done, too. but, i'm not singleminded in it - he's done a couple of things that i thought were decent. overall, i give him a D+.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jason Henderson
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Chris Losinger wrote: Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. I guess that makes me horrible too? I parrot his "nonsense" because I agree with him. If I didn't agree, I wouldn't listen. And no, I don't agree because I'm brain washed. Chris Losinger wrote: he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality. Apparently you don't listen much. Liberal minded people call in all the time and he quite effectively puts down their arguments. I agree that Rush is very polarizing, but I have heard him give limited praise to some democrats for things they have done. Chris Losinger wrote: prove it. prove how Iraq is more of a danger than Saudi Arabia, NK or Pakistan. The people of SA and Pak may be more dangerous than most, but their governments seem to have a vested interest in being nice to the US. Saddam and NK, on the other hand, have governments that actively and vocally hate the US. Big difference there. Chris Losinger wrote: i don't think there's a valid reason for war. I'll accept that argument from you, but a large number of the protesters were communists (there was a communist table on the sidewalk in SF), anarchists and Bush haters. If Clinton or Gore were president, they would be silent as evidenced by their lack of opposition to BC's bombings of Iraq, et al. BTW, I have nothing against anti-war protesters who are actually against war for idiological reasons and who have actually thought about their opinions. These people probably would have been against WWII and that's their prerogative.

          Jason Henderson
          "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

          articles profile

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J JoeSox

            Chris Losinger wrote: Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. it doesn't really have anything to do with "conservatism"; in my eyes, he's no better than Al Sharpton or anyone else who polarizes every issue into Us vs Them. Black vs. White, Conservative vs. Liberal, whatever. his whole M.O. is to find a topic, find a way to polarize it, then rant about it. Amen Brotha!! Plus, I heard he gets funded by the republican party. I should probably go find that proof one day. Later,
            JoeSox
            www.joeswammi.com
            Untitled[^]

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jason Henderson
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            JoeSox wrote: Plus, I heard he gets funded by the republican party. You do that. He gets funded by his advertisers.

            Jason Henderson
            "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

            articles profile

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jason Henderson

              Chris Losinger wrote: Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. I guess that makes me horrible too? I parrot his "nonsense" because I agree with him. If I didn't agree, I wouldn't listen. And no, I don't agree because I'm brain washed. Chris Losinger wrote: he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality. Apparently you don't listen much. Liberal minded people call in all the time and he quite effectively puts down their arguments. I agree that Rush is very polarizing, but I have heard him give limited praise to some democrats for things they have done. Chris Losinger wrote: prove it. prove how Iraq is more of a danger than Saudi Arabia, NK or Pakistan. The people of SA and Pak may be more dangerous than most, but their governments seem to have a vested interest in being nice to the US. Saddam and NK, on the other hand, have governments that actively and vocally hate the US. Big difference there. Chris Losinger wrote: i don't think there's a valid reason for war. I'll accept that argument from you, but a large number of the protesters were communists (there was a communist table on the sidewalk in SF), anarchists and Bush haters. If Clinton or Gore were president, they would be silent as evidenced by their lack of opposition to BC's bombings of Iraq, et al. BTW, I have nothing against anti-war protesters who are actually against war for idiological reasons and who have actually thought about their opinions. These people probably would have been against WWII and that's their prerogative.

              Jason Henderson
              "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

              articles profile

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Losinger
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Jason Henderson wrote: Apparently you don't listen much i've listened enough to have an opinion. Jason Henderson wrote: I agree that Rush is very polarizing, but I have heard him give limited praise to some democrats for things they have done i'm mostly busy on the firsts of April. Jason Henderson wrote: If Clinton or Gore were president, they would be silent as evidenced by their lack of opposition to BC's bombings of Iraq, et al. can i borrow your ESP sometime? i'd like to know what my wife really wants for next X-mas, and i'd like to be able to get it now, before my savings is totally wiped out. -c

              Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

              Fractals

              J D 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Losinger

                Jason Henderson wrote: Apparently you don't listen much i've listened enough to have an opinion. Jason Henderson wrote: I agree that Rush is very polarizing, but I have heard him give limited praise to some democrats for things they have done i'm mostly busy on the firsts of April. Jason Henderson wrote: If Clinton or Gore were president, they would be silent as evidenced by their lack of opposition to BC's bombings of Iraq, et al. can i borrow your ESP sometime? i'd like to know what my wife really wants for next X-mas, and i'd like to be able to get it now, before my savings is totally wiped out. -c

                Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                Fractals

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jason Henderson
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Chris Losinger wrote: i'm mostly busy on the firsts of April. :rolleyes: :-D Chris Losinger wrote: can i borrow your ESP sometime? i'd like to know what my wife really wants for next X-mas, and i'd like to be able to get it now, before my savings is totally wiped out I base my predictions on past actions and motives. Just get your wife exactly what you got her this year. :)

                Jason Henderson
                "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                articles profile

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jason Henderson

                  Conservative infiltration[^] of the San Fransico war protests. Check out those signs. Let the flames begin!

                  Jason Henderson
                  "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                  articles profile

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  KaRl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  I don't know who's the guy top-left on the front page, with the brilling smile, but he gives me desire to send slaps :) Because the war in Iraq will be for the good of Iraqui, I would like to know the position of the conservatives on Kurdistan.

                  Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Losinger

                    Jason Henderson wrote: . It appears that you hate Rush and all conservatives because they don't believe the same things you do Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. it doesn't really have anything to do with "conservatism"; in my eyes, he's no better than Al Sharpton or anyone else who polarizes every issue into Us vs Them. Black vs. White, Conservative vs. Liberal, whatever. his whole M.O. is to find a topic, find a way to polarize it, then rant about it. he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality. he isn't interested in balance, objective discussion; he's only interested in pushing the Liberal vs Conservative line - even when it has no bearing on the topic. so it's not "news", but calling it entertainment is a cop-out. Friends is entertainment; Rush speaks about current events and issues and puts a polarized policital spin on everything (everything except his commercial spots, of course). "conservatives" are a different story. but i try hard to let each one of them define themselves before i pass judgement. Jason Henderson wrote: Why didn't you cry foul when Clinton did it, or did you? i did. Jason Henderson wrote: there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam prove it. prove how Iraq is more of a danger than Saudi Arabia, NK or Pakistan. Jason Henderson wrote: fact that most prominent democrats were all for the missle strikes but now, when there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam, the democrats all line up behind the anti-war protesters more democrats voted for GWB's blank check than voted against it, incuding all of the current major democratic presidential candidates. Jason Henderson wrote: Its not about being against war, its about being against Bush isn't it Chris? i don't think there's a valid reason for war. there are many issues that need to be worked on, but i don't think a full-scale invasion, occupation and rebuilding of Iraq is the best way to do it. i can think of better ways to spend half a trillion taxpayer dollars. i dislike GWB for a hundred other things he's done, too. but, i'm not singleminded in it - he's done a couple of things that i thought were decent. overall, i give him a D+.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Shog9 0
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Chris Losinger wrote: Friends is entertainment *cough* Now you're just being silly...

                    shog nine

                    Ever since i heard the voice i thought i had no choice...

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Shog9 0

                      Chris Losinger wrote: Friends is entertainment *cough* Now you're just being silly...

                      shog nine

                      Ever since i heard the voice i thought i had no choice...

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Chris Losinger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      well, ok. Friends is intended to be entertainment, and nothing else. :)

                      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                      Fractals

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Losinger

                        well, ok. Friends is intended to be entertainment, and nothing else. :)

                        Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                        Fractals

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Shog9 0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        :)

                        shog nine

                        Ever since i heard the voice i thought i had no choice...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris Losinger

                          Jason Henderson wrote: Apparently you don't listen much i've listened enough to have an opinion. Jason Henderson wrote: I agree that Rush is very polarizing, but I have heard him give limited praise to some democrats for things they have done i'm mostly busy on the firsts of April. Jason Henderson wrote: If Clinton or Gore were president, they would be silent as evidenced by their lack of opposition to BC's bombings of Iraq, et al. can i borrow your ESP sometime? i'd like to know what my wife really wants for next X-mas, and i'd like to be able to get it now, before my savings is totally wiped out. -c

                          Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                          Fractals

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Daniel Ferguson
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          i'm mostly busy on the firsts of April. Thanks for that, I'm still laughing. :-D

                          "Pretending to guide me, you led me astray, And I don't want to fall into your kind of ways." "Melt", Front 242

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Chris Losinger

                            Jason Henderson wrote: . It appears that you hate Rush and all conservatives because they don't believe the same things you do Rush is horrible. people who parrot his nonsense are worse. it doesn't really have anything to do with "conservatism"; in my eyes, he's no better than Al Sharpton or anyone else who polarizes every issue into Us vs Them. Black vs. White, Conservative vs. Liberal, whatever. his whole M.O. is to find a topic, find a way to polarize it, then rant about it. he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality. he isn't interested in balance, objective discussion; he's only interested in pushing the Liberal vs Conservative line - even when it has no bearing on the topic. so it's not "news", but calling it entertainment is a cop-out. Friends is entertainment; Rush speaks about current events and issues and puts a polarized policital spin on everything (everything except his commercial spots, of course). "conservatives" are a different story. but i try hard to let each one of them define themselves before i pass judgement. Jason Henderson wrote: Why didn't you cry foul when Clinton did it, or did you? i did. Jason Henderson wrote: there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam prove it. prove how Iraq is more of a danger than Saudi Arabia, NK or Pakistan. Jason Henderson wrote: fact that most prominent democrats were all for the missle strikes but now, when there is a clear and present danger from terrorists receiving aid from Saddam, the democrats all line up behind the anti-war protesters more democrats voted for GWB's blank check than voted against it, incuding all of the current major democratic presidential candidates. Jason Henderson wrote: Its not about being against war, its about being against Bush isn't it Chris? i don't think there's a valid reason for war. there are many issues that need to be worked on, but i don't think a full-scale invasion, occupation and rebuilding of Iraq is the best way to do it. i can think of better ways to spend half a trillion taxpayer dollars. i dislike GWB for a hundred other things he's done, too. but, i'm not singleminded in it - he's done a couple of things that i thought were decent. overall, i give him a D+.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stan Shannon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Chris Losinger wrote: Rush is horrible Oh, he isn't that bad. At least he is honest about who and what he is. It's not like he is trying to hide behind phoney bipartisenship. Chris Losinger wrote: he won't take opposing viewpoints on his show, nobody is allowed to speak except for people who agree with him, or people too weak to defend themselves against his personality I don't listen to him much, but every time I do, I hear as many opposing phone calls as "ditto" ones. But, his show is *about* his personality and nothing else. Chris Losinger wrote: he isn't interested in balance, objective discussion; Which he admits up front. Listen to O'Rielly if you want that. Limbaugh articulates a forceful, yet fairly mainstream conservative argument and is very good at it. That is why he is disliked by those who disagree with him. "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jason Henderson

                              JoeSox wrote: Plus, I heard he gets funded by the republican party. You do that. He gets funded by his advertisers.

                              Jason Henderson
                              "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                              articles profile

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              JoeSox
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              Jason Henderson wrote: You do that. http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=423403&forumid=2605#xx423403xx[^] :-D I found James Retter book "Anatomy of a Scandal: An Investigation.", which he links Rush to the Republican party. Later,
                              JoeSox
                              www.joeswammi.com
                              Untitled[^]

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes

                              • Login
                              • Don't have an account? Register
                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups