Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Workspaces Forum
  4. Workspaces Terms?

Workspaces Terms?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Workspaces Forum
questionworkspace
7 Posts 3 Posters 22 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Aravol Amakiir
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Is there a specific Terms of Service with regards to Workspaces, specifically paid-for Private Workspaces? I've been trying to find such, and have seen mentioned that private projects are very private, but the existing ToS wouldn't seem to accommodate that. Regarding thus, would it also render a private Workspace public if the creator's Pro subscription expired or was canceled? Or would they just be unable to add apps to the project until renewing?

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Aravol Amakiir

      Is there a specific Terms of Service with regards to Workspaces, specifically paid-for Private Workspaces? I've been trying to find such, and have seen mentioned that private projects are very private, but the existing ToS wouldn't seem to accommodate that. Regarding thus, would it also render a private Workspace public if the creator's Pro subscription expired or was canceled? Or would they just be unable to add apps to the project until renewing?

      K Offline
      K Offline
      Kamil Burzynski
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      At this moment we do not have ::Workspaces-specific terms of service yet, general CodeProject terms do apply. However, we are working on getting document like that. Your private content will never become public without your approval. If your premium subscription expires, the private workspaces will be locked down and you will not be able to access them. If you renew the subscription, the lock will be lifted. After subscription expires nothing is deleted, just rights of access do change.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kamil Burzynski

        At this moment we do not have ::Workspaces-specific terms of service yet, general CodeProject terms do apply. However, we are working on getting document like that. Your private content will never become public without your approval. If your premium subscription expires, the private workspaces will be locked down and you will not be able to access them. If you renew the subscription, the lock will be lifted. After subscription expires nothing is deleted, just rights of access do change.

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Aravol Amakiir
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Excellent! That brings up another question, though, regarding Privatization - is there any way to mix and match privitization of apps and projects? Say I create a library I'd like to keep private, but release an API, would there be a way to publicly display the API Wiki (and thus the project itself so people can access said Wiki), but keep the Repo itself and an internal Wiki private?

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Aravol Amakiir

          Excellent! That brings up another question, though, regarding Privatization - is there any way to mix and match privitization of apps and projects? Say I create a library I'd like to keep private, but release an API, would there be a way to publicly display the API Wiki (and thus the project itself so people can access said Wiki), but keep the Repo itself and an internal Wiki private?

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Kamil Burzynski
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Currently the public/private switch is attached to each workspace. We do not plan to change it anytime soon, though I can imagine scenarios where half of workspace would be desired to be public and half private. So, there is a chance that we will implement such feature in (probably distant) future. In meantime, the suggested way to handle this would be to created 2 workspaces, one public and one private.

          A D 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • K Kamil Burzynski

            Currently the public/private switch is attached to each workspace. We do not plan to change it anytime soon, though I can imagine scenarios where half of workspace would be desired to be public and half private. So, there is a chance that we will implement such feature in (probably distant) future. In meantime, the suggested way to handle this would be to created 2 workspaces, one public and one private.

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Aravol Amakiir
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            While inelegant, sounds like a workable solution. I'll make sure to post the idea for mixed permissions to the feature requests when I get the chance. Thanks for the answers!

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Aravol Amakiir

              While inelegant, sounds like a workable solution. I'll make sure to post the idea for mixed permissions to the feature requests when I get the chance. Thanks for the answers!

              K Offline
              K Offline
              Kamil Burzynski
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Great, thanks.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Kamil Burzynski

                Currently the public/private switch is attached to each workspace. We do not plan to change it anytime soon, though I can imagine scenarios where half of workspace would be desired to be public and half private. So, there is a chance that we will implement such feature in (probably distant) future. In meantime, the suggested way to handle this would be to created 2 workspaces, one public and one private.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                David Cunningham
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I can imagine the scenario as well, but I would want to carefully weigh the ease of management that would afford with the potential for accidentally releasing private info to the public. I think it would be better to err on the side of security here and make it less likely for someone to accidentally publicize something. One more thing to debate! yay!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups